Antimatter and annihilation

(Image I)

Antimatter and annihilation

The researchers are found antimatter in protons. That thing makes the question, how this is possible? The antimatter is an incredible thing, and there is only one use in that material, and the thing is an energy source. The antimatter reacts with its mirror particle causing the thing called "annihilation", where both particles are turning to energy. The antimatter doesn't only contain antiprotons, antineutrons, and antielectrons (positrons), which have positive polarity.

By connecting the electrons with positrons by putting those particles in the rotation is possible to make positronium. In positronium, the rotation movement keeps those particles away from each other. It is researched the possibility to make "stable positronium" by anchoring the electron and positron in a certain position is possible to store antiprotons in the bottle without outcoming electricity.

(Image II)

(Image II) "An electron and positron orbiting around their common center of mass. (An s state has zero angular momentum; so orbiting around each other would mean going straight at each other until scattered or until annihilation, whichever comes first). This is a bound quantum state known as positronium "(Wikipedia, positronium)

In normal scenarios, the antimatter or anti-ions are stored in a magnetic bottle where the magnetic field keeps the particles hovering without touching the wall. But positrons can be stored between two layers where the protons are positioned in the middle of the structure. That thing can use in antimatter batteries. The idea is that way the antimatter can store without magnetic bottles. But that thing seems very unstable.

Most of all other particles have anti-particle pairs. The quarks have also anti-quark pairs, and possibly even the Higgs boson has the pair called "anti-Higgs boson". The photon has not observed the "anti-photon" pair. But maybe that thing exists. The antiparticles have the opposite polarity with normal particles and that thing causes those particles will pull each other together, and if the particles are impacting, that causes an explosion.

(Image III) (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00430-3)

The reason why antimatter in protons doesn't seem to react is that antimatter is hovering in some kind of electric- or quantum field, and that thing keeps the antimatter away from its mirror particles. The proton is the network of the quark-antiquark pairs, which are making complicated structures, as you see in image III (Image III).

So that complicated structure and interactions between particle-antiparticle pairs inside proton cause question: are it possible that there could happen internal and spontaneous annihilation between those particles inside a proton?

Neutrino is an interesting version of antimatter because it interacts only with the antineutrino. And that could theoretically offer the possibility to make a safe antimatter fuel or antimatter storage.

When we are observing one of the most interesting pairs of material and antimatter particles neutrino and antineutrino, there is a small difference between those masses. If the mass of antineutrino is smaller than neutrino, that means it loses it somewhere. And if the mass of antineutrino is bigger, that means it would get energy from somewhere. The fact is that there "seems" to be a difference in the masses between neutrino and antineutrino. And measuring that mass is an extremely tricky thing.

A neutrino can travel through the planet without any kind of interaction. It seems not to participate in the strong interaction, so that means that theoretically, the antimatter can store in the neutrino bottle without the need to afraid the annihilation. But we ever can get enough neutrinos, that the bottle is possible to make, but that hypothesis is nice to think.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00430-3

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/110825172501.htm

https://www.techexplorist.com/proton-complicated-expected-think-scientists/38011/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiparticle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronium

Image I: https://astronomy.com/magazine/ask-astro/2012/01/collisions-happen

Image II: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronium

Image III: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00430-3

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low. The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away. When the box is filled with quantum gas and som

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper? The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown. But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull. The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting armor has

Thoughts about the future, world, and technology

Search This Blog