An ultimate challenge to Big Bang theory has been thrown

 The Big Bang theory still lives, but it also advances

.

An ultimate challenge to Big Bang theory has been thrown

There are two things about the Big Bang theory

1) Where the material that formed the space, what released it to Universe came from?

2) And what caused that Big Bang?

Was the dark matter released before Big Bang? And was dark matter formed the black hole, what released the matter what is forming the Universe? When we are talking about the Big Bang, we are too often think that the entire material released from that point. We are forgetting that there is the possibility that dark matter is released in time and space at different times than visible material. 

Where that material came from what formed the point, where it released during the Big Bang? Was it came from some other universe or dimension? Or was it some kind of solid- or frozen wave movement? Or maybe it was superstrings? But where those superstrings came from? 

The indestructibility of matter in the law defines that matter cannot arise from anything and cannot disappear into emptiness. It can only turn into wave motion and back. 

But where did that wave motion come from that formed the matter that formed the universe? There must be some kind of source of that wave movement because either wave movement cannot start from anything or rather saying emptiness. There must be a source like energy eruption for wave movement. So there must be disturbing in the universe. 

Did that disturbing cause that part of dark matter turned to visible material? And then we must ask, where that dark matter came from? If the wave movement from somewhere caused that point, where the Big Bang happened, that thing makes it possible that the dark matter existed before the Big Bang. Then for some reason, the dark matter turned into the black hole, which explodes. That caused the question of where the dark matter came from?

What caused the Big Bang? Why the material released? If the antigravity caused that explosion, we might want to know, what made that antigravity wave in the proto universe? 

Sometimes people ask, should we rather call the Big Bang the Big Burst,  and that is one theory that requires updating.  When the original Big Bang theory was created that thing offers a good and simple explanation for begin of the Universe. 

The beginning of the Universe was at the point, where the entire material that formed Universe was packed in a small space, what size was less than centimeters. When the Big Bang theory introduced in the year 1965 there was a weakness in that theory because it was not explained where the material that formed the point, where the material released to time and space? 

In the year 1965, people look for simple answers and the Big Bang theory offered them. The theory is simple to understand and it's very simple until we face the question "where the material, what formed the Universe came to the point, where it released? In the year 1965 was no idea about things like the Multiverse theory. So can the multiverse theory explain the origin of material? I think that it raises the question: where was the first universe? And where the material came to the first universe?

Those theories would explain things like the Big Bang as the material that was released from wormholes, what opened from some other universe. The multiverse theory means that there could be other universes, but those universes can be in the same dimension or some other dimension, like in the fifth universe. The Big Bang theory was the product of the time. It offered a simple solution for the beginning of everything without other universes and aliens. 

 When we are thinking about the Big Bang theory, that theory can be suitable for the partial answer for the origin of the material and universe. Theories are advancing, and there are multiple variations of many theories.  But the fact is that before Big Bang was a giant black hole, that somehow explodes or erupts. The advantage of the international network allows finding the ideas and data about the Universe. Also, the attitudes about science are changing. 

When the exoplanets are found and now we know that the planetary systems are more common than we ever imagined, that thing opened the road to more advanced, open, and accurate way to make research. The multiverse theory is a very good thing, and the problem is that we do not know, what is outside of our Universe. If there is nothing, we can say that dimension itself continues. If we want to uncover the existence of other universes, we should collect data from outside of our Universe. 

And in that case, the light pollution, what comes from stars and galaxies are uncovering the weak light, what might come out from the other galaxies. When the level of knowledge is increasing, we are saying that the writings and calculations of the Big Bang would also get longer, and there would be the sub-theories like the material would come from the other dimension or another universe. 

https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2021/mar/06/four-indian-scientistschallenge-big-bang-theory-2272915.html

https://phys.org/news/2015-12-big-theory.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse