Skip to main content

This is what people don't want you to know about ultra-fast aircraft




This is what people don't want you to know about ultra-fast aircraft

When we are thinking about the aircraft like MiG-25 (1) and MiG-31(2), which are the extreme fast interceptors, we might think that those aircraft are somehow harmless. The thing is that the ultimate fast speed would allow them to fly to the outer atmosphere, and they are capable to destroy the low-orbiting satellites. But there are also rumors, that in some of those aircraft robot versions would be installed the nuclear bombs, and they would be used as the cruise missiles, what can return to the base if they are no need to use. 

And sometimes we might wonder, why they are mentioned in the list of the gunships?

Many people believe that effective attack aircraft would need a sophisticated weapon system for being dangerous, but this is not true if we would want to sweep away the entire enemy army. So have you ever heard the term "sonic boom"? The term means the conical pressure wall, which is forming if the aircraft is moving faster than sound. This means that when the aircraft would cross the sound barrier the air would not have time to go away from the front of the plane. That causes effect, where the air molecules are pushed away from the surface of the aircraft with the speed, which increases Mach 1. 

The thing is that the pressure wall would travel faster than the speed of sound, and that turns the air to the wall, which is called "shock wave". This term is taken from the explosives. The pressure impact of explosives causes the pressure wall, which travels in the air by the burning speed of the explosive. A nuclear weapon creates a pressure effect by increasing the temperature very fast at the point, where the explosion happens, and the expanding gas is the thing, that is called a shock wave. 

The thing is that if the aircraft, what travels by speed Mach 3, would fly very low, the pressure wall would be hard as steel, and that thing would cause terrible damages in the area, where that thing affects. But what if we would install loudspeakers to the nose of MIG-31 or MiG-25, which are the Mach 3 interceptors? That thing would cause the movement of the air molecules would get the speed of aircraft behind them, and this means that the pressure wall would travel 4000 kilometers per hour to the target. This is the reason, why the aircraft cannon is effective. 

 If the speed of the ammunition of the cannon in a stable position is 1000 kilometers per hour, would the aircraft cannon, what uses the same ammunition would be installed in the aircraft, what is flying 1500 km/h, the speed of ammunition will be 2500 km/h. This makes the aircraft cannons more effective than the similar cannons, which is installed on a stable platform. And if the aircraft is flying speed of Mach 3 it can make the ballistic jump, which makes it capable to destroy low orbiting satellites. 

(1)

(2)

Image:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som...

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t...

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting ...