Why we are afraid to introduce the visions of the future?
We can take effect on the future, but we can just give punishments because things, what are happened in the past. This is the thing, which is interesting. When people are writing fiction about the past, that thing is a good film or good book, which portraits things at least realistic. These kinds of movies and books are happening in some very well known environments or cases, but the main characters are fully fiction, but those stories are ever childish, they are meant for an adult audience.
But when somebody would write the book or makes a movie about the future, that thing is somehow childish. This is a really good thing to think about, and one really good question is why a person, who imagines the future is using imagination, but the person, who makes fiction about the past is making novels or movies. Why the writing and thinking about the future is not so respected than writing about the past?
If we are thinking about a fictional book about the Mars-base or colonies in somewhere else in the space, we are facing the thing, that nobody would punish because of those writings. But if we are writing fictional writing about some WWII officer, and somebody takes those things as the real thing, that can cause punishment for an innocent person, or otherwise saying, war criminals can be released because of those writings.
And here we are coming to the future and writing about it. We can take effect things, what are happening in the future, as I have written before. But the effect of every decision cannot be predicted if we would not have the ability to see to the future, and that means that the result of every decision has some effect, but we cannot know, what the final effect would be, and how long that effect would stand. If we would know those things, we would make very wise decisions.
So what means futurology. Some of my friends that thing is some kind of science fiction. And that thing is true from some point of view, but futurology is the science, what mission would be predicted, what some technical advantages would cause to mankind, and when we are thinking the role of technology, that thing alone is not dangerous. But if the technology is connected to some other science that thing turns dangerous.
And the question is why we are developing new tools? The answer is that we need new tools for two things. If we like to sell merchandise to markets, we must create new things for maintaining people's interest in buying new tools and new things, and that keeps markets growing. But another thing is that if we are thinking about the violence of mankind, we must develop more and more effective weapons and tools for soldiers.
And the thing, what those people are giving as an argument about the development of nuclear weapons and combat robots is that somebody would make those tools anyway sooner or later. The second argument is that those robots can be destroyed or their actions can deny by using weapons, which have not to effect to humans.
Those weapons are computer viruses and electromagnetic radiation, which would deny the communication of those drones. But there is a possibility that high power radio transmission would affect the human nervous system, and that thing makes those things terrifying.
There is a possibility, that the high power radio transmission could reboot the brains, and adjust the EEG to the new form. And that means that the computer viruses, which contains the synthetic EEG would be the next-generation weapons, which can infect the human brains, and turn the henchmen against their leaders. That is one thing, what we must realize when we are talking about the future.
We can take effect on the future, but we can just give punishments because things, what are happened in the past. This is the thing, which is interesting. When people are writing fiction about the past, that thing is a good film or good book, which portraits things at least realistic. These kinds of movies and books are happening in some very well known environments or cases, but the main characters are fully fiction, but those stories are ever childish, they are meant for an adult audience.
But when somebody would write the book or makes a movie about the future, that thing is somehow childish. This is a really good thing to think about, and one really good question is why a person, who imagines the future is using imagination, but the person, who makes fiction about the past is making novels or movies. Why the writing and thinking about the future is not so respected than writing about the past?
If we are thinking about a fictional book about the Mars-base or colonies in somewhere else in the space, we are facing the thing, that nobody would punish because of those writings. But if we are writing fictional writing about some WWII officer, and somebody takes those things as the real thing, that can cause punishment for an innocent person, or otherwise saying, war criminals can be released because of those writings.
And here we are coming to the future and writing about it. We can take effect things, what are happening in the future, as I have written before. But the effect of every decision cannot be predicted if we would not have the ability to see to the future, and that means that the result of every decision has some effect, but we cannot know, what the final effect would be, and how long that effect would stand. If we would know those things, we would make very wise decisions.
So what means futurology. Some of my friends that thing is some kind of science fiction. And that thing is true from some point of view, but futurology is the science, what mission would be predicted, what some technical advantages would cause to mankind, and when we are thinking the role of technology, that thing alone is not dangerous. But if the technology is connected to some other science that thing turns dangerous.
And the question is why we are developing new tools? The answer is that we need new tools for two things. If we like to sell merchandise to markets, we must create new things for maintaining people's interest in buying new tools and new things, and that keeps markets growing. But another thing is that if we are thinking about the violence of mankind, we must develop more and more effective weapons and tools for soldiers.
And the thing, what those people are giving as an argument about the development of nuclear weapons and combat robots is that somebody would make those tools anyway sooner or later. The second argument is that those robots can be destroyed or their actions can deny by using weapons, which have not to effect to humans.
Those weapons are computer viruses and electromagnetic radiation, which would deny the communication of those drones. But there is a possibility that high power radio transmission would affect the human nervous system, and that thing makes those things terrifying.
There is a possibility, that the high power radio transmission could reboot the brains, and adjust the EEG to the new form. And that means that the computer viruses, which contains the synthetic EEG would be the next-generation weapons, which can infect the human brains, and turn the henchmen against their leaders. That is one thing, what we must realize when we are talking about the future.
Comments
Post a Comment