One writing about political commercials
Donald Trump is one of the best examples, why we should interest more in politics. That man is a colorful personality, who has used media very effectively to get people voting himself. And I think that the clear way to speak has made this man very popular. But is that man, what people like, or what they want to see in the White House?
But we must realize that those Donland Trumps are mostly harmless. They are very colorful, but the thing is that this kind of person might be dangerous. If we think the case that every commercial TV-or net-TV-site would be owned by one person, and then those channels would open public for the time of election campaign and the people are allowing to see good movies in those channels. But inside those movies would be the commercials of a certain candidate. That kind of thing offers very good benefits for the people, who are supported by owners of the channel.
Twitter has prohibited the political commercials in their channel, and now we must ask, what is the difference between political marketing and advisement? This is the thing, what we should ask before we are prohibiting anything? When we are thinking about the form of political and other marketing, we are always forgetting that political marketing might be camouflaged as the discussion, and in there the persons might send links or something like that, what are linking the homepages, where might be made for supporting some politicians.
Or they might be some kind of meme-pages, what might look like humorous, but where are the links to the political pages, or what is full of political propaganda. I know, that I use word propaganda, and it has negative content, but in my opinion, every kind of political commercial is propaganda.
Propaganda or psychological operations are styles, where people are telling their opinions about things, and many times we have forgotten that when we are making political commercials, we are making commercials for the political party. This thing is one of the most remarkable ideas in the world. The problem with internet marketing is that everybody would get the same audience, and by using minimum budgets would the commercial get very many lookers.
But the problem is that politics is ever been in fashion because it's not interesting "normal people". But are we interesting things, what are decided by politicians? Political leaders are ruling nations, and they make decisions about things, what would be done in the next election season. And that's why this kind of thing should interest people.
We are living in a democracy, or shaper saying we are living in a republic. That means that we are electing people in the parliament, who are making decisions. And the reason for that is the people, who are sitting in parliament have the chance to read the information, what is needed to make good decisions.
And then we must realize the thing that we should describe the word "good". Is the decision good only for politician self, and the support team for a political party, what this person represents. Or is is it good for the majority of the country? That is enough, but what the same decision makes for the minority? When on opposite sides are economy, humanity, and defense we are facing big ideologies. And that kind of thing is really good to think when we will I hope to go next time to go to give our votes.
Thursday, October 31, 2019
Radial particle accelerator
Radial particle accelerator
Do you know, what is the radial particle accelerator? It is the machine, what is created for material research, and the mission of that system, what looks a little bit like a radial piston engine, what would shoot the ionized material in the central point of that system. So in this multiple accelerator system, the accelerators would be in the form, what is looking like a radial engine. The mission of that system is to use small energy particle accelerators for impacting many ionized atoms together by creating new superheavy elements, what is existed only a couple of nanoseconds.
The idea is that the radial accelerator can shoot more ions at the same point than the normal particle accelerator. This kind of system is sometimes used in fusion experiments. In Sandia laboratories, this kind of system is used for creating so-called impulse fusion. The idea is that the system would shoot those ions together, and at the same time, it would need less energy than Tokamak or torus systems because the ions are pulling each other together.
But the radial accelerators might have history, what people would not usually know. Those systems were planned to use in the hypothetical spacecraft known as "Kosmokrator". The idea of this system is that the normal nuclear reactor would give power to the radial accelerators, which would create superheavy radioactive elements for the motor of that system. This kind of spacecraft would open the road to the entire solar system.
The idea is that by using ionized Uranium, Iron or some other element, the accelerators would shoot those atoms together, and then then the formed element, what would be existed in a couple of nanoseconds would be used as the fuel of the high power reactors. The fusion of iron might seem very impractical because it needs outer energy to sustain, but that would help to create the super heavy and very radioactive elements for high power reactors because the storage of those elements is very difficult, and there is easier to create them by using fusion. But this system is only one theoretical spaceship, which has been created during history.
There is one other remarkable system, where the radial particle accelerator would be useful. During the Cold War, the SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) defense program some scientists suggested the system, where magnetized plutonium or uranium powder would shoot in the chamber, where would be created the fission reaction. That system would create the most massive particle flow in the space, what people have ever seen. And the thing is that that kind of system could destroy incoming missiles and cause the very strong EMP-pulses to the atmosphere. That ion layer would deny the communication between satellites and clients and EMP pulse can destroy the electronics all over the Earth.
Image
https://www.sandia.gov/news/publications/research_magazine/articles/2017/03/images/z_machine_600.jpg
A couple of words of time travel
A couple of words of time travel
Hypothesis about the briefcase men from the future.
Have you seen time-machine movies? Do you know what those fictional heroes make with those crystal sticks? Those crystals are oscillating with the same frequency with crystal, which is in the leaving point and helps to adjust the time machine. In theory, the time machine is possible, and we would want to go to the past. But if we would want to get back, there would be problems.
And sometimes the theorists or science fiction writers have created the model, where the person leaves the message to the descendants for sending the ideas and innovations from the future. This kind of time loop, where the astronaut from tomorrow would pump the data of the solutions of the future would help some hypothetical society to get ultimate power, even if those time travelers could travel only in one direction. That hypothetical future technology would give great benefit for people, who have it in their hands.
The theory behind the hypothesis of time travel
We know that we can stop time if we are moving fast enough, and there is introduced an idea that in someday, we would create the giant particle accelerator, where the small craft will accelerate to the speed of light, and that thing would cause that we will start to travel in time, and this makes possible to travel to future. But how we would travel to the past? This is a really interesting question?
When we would slow time in capsule, let's say about 50 %, which means that one year in the capsule would be two years outside. The thing, that we must do for creating that effect is to travel the speed, which is 50% of the speed of light. But how we would make the time travel faster in the craft? This is the problem in the theories of time travel. In theories, what is far from real life there could be organisms, what has so advanced nanotechnology, that they could be nanomachines in their body, what rotates the extreme small plates near the speed of light, and that thing would stop the time in their bodies.
But we don't have a chance to create that system in real life, because we cannot create structures, what would stand this kind of speed. And in real life, this kind of disk would be broken because of the centrifugal force, and that's why this kind of thing is pure theoretical level.
One version is that we would send the spacecraft in the black hole, and hope that there would be the space, where time would travel backward. And if we cannot go back to the point, where we have left, the time-traveling has no sense. The idea of time machine would be simple, and there is needed the plate, what rotates near the speed of light, and that's why the principle of the H.G Wells time machine is right, as we might so often say in theory. But how we could travel back in time? The idea of time slowing is that the energy level of the particle would increase.
And if we would create the opposite effect, and pump the energy out of the particle, we could make time moving backward, because, in the capsule, the time travels faster. In this case, we would need to create something, what we ever imagine is possible. We must create a particle where the movement is absolute zero. And we cannot create absolute stability, because the universe is moving, and this will put limits to create a time machine.
But let's think, that we could pull the entire energy off the craft, and we could create the space, where time moves faster, that thing would make the craft where is one cabin inside other. That means that when we are creating this hypothetical time machine we must make the structure, where are two hypothetical time machines one inside other. But as you see those systems are only theoretical research.
There is one little problem that we haven't even think about while we are thinking about this kind of technology. And that is, what if the "spin" of the nuclear particles of the time machine would turn, and the entire craft would turn to antimatter. This kind of technology would be dangerous because that allows some states to travel to the past, and start the battles by using modern military technology. And those things are, of course, very big moral and ethic questions. But who knows, what we would do in a distant future? Maybe there this kind of technology would be possible, but there would be many technical problems with materials and other kinds of things before this technology is coming to true.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipMwrcvukpU&feature=youtu.be
Hypothesis about the briefcase men from the future.
Have you seen time-machine movies? Do you know what those fictional heroes make with those crystal sticks? Those crystals are oscillating with the same frequency with crystal, which is in the leaving point and helps to adjust the time machine. In theory, the time machine is possible, and we would want to go to the past. But if we would want to get back, there would be problems.
And sometimes the theorists or science fiction writers have created the model, where the person leaves the message to the descendants for sending the ideas and innovations from the future. This kind of time loop, where the astronaut from tomorrow would pump the data of the solutions of the future would help some hypothetical society to get ultimate power, even if those time travelers could travel only in one direction. That hypothetical future technology would give great benefit for people, who have it in their hands.
The theory behind the hypothesis of time travel
We know that we can stop time if we are moving fast enough, and there is introduced an idea that in someday, we would create the giant particle accelerator, where the small craft will accelerate to the speed of light, and that thing would cause that we will start to travel in time, and this makes possible to travel to future. But how we would travel to the past? This is a really interesting question?
When we would slow time in capsule, let's say about 50 %, which means that one year in the capsule would be two years outside. The thing, that we must do for creating that effect is to travel the speed, which is 50% of the speed of light. But how we would make the time travel faster in the craft? This is the problem in the theories of time travel. In theories, what is far from real life there could be organisms, what has so advanced nanotechnology, that they could be nanomachines in their body, what rotates the extreme small plates near the speed of light, and that thing would stop the time in their bodies.
But we don't have a chance to create that system in real life, because we cannot create structures, what would stand this kind of speed. And in real life, this kind of disk would be broken because of the centrifugal force, and that's why this kind of thing is pure theoretical level.
One version is that we would send the spacecraft in the black hole, and hope that there would be the space, where time would travel backward. And if we cannot go back to the point, where we have left, the time-traveling has no sense. The idea of time machine would be simple, and there is needed the plate, what rotates near the speed of light, and that's why the principle of the H.G Wells time machine is right, as we might so often say in theory. But how we could travel back in time? The idea of time slowing is that the energy level of the particle would increase.
And if we would create the opposite effect, and pump the energy out of the particle, we could make time moving backward, because, in the capsule, the time travels faster. In this case, we would need to create something, what we ever imagine is possible. We must create a particle where the movement is absolute zero. And we cannot create absolute stability, because the universe is moving, and this will put limits to create a time machine.
But let's think, that we could pull the entire energy off the craft, and we could create the space, where time moves faster, that thing would make the craft where is one cabin inside other. That means that when we are creating this hypothetical time machine we must make the structure, where are two hypothetical time machines one inside other. But as you see those systems are only theoretical research.
There is one little problem that we haven't even think about while we are thinking about this kind of technology. And that is, what if the "spin" of the nuclear particles of the time machine would turn, and the entire craft would turn to antimatter. This kind of technology would be dangerous because that allows some states to travel to the past, and start the battles by using modern military technology. And those things are, of course, very big moral and ethic questions. But who knows, what we would do in a distant future? Maybe there this kind of technology would be possible, but there would be many technical problems with materials and other kinds of things before this technology is coming to true.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipMwrcvukpU&feature=youtu.be
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
More about quantum electricity
More about quantum electricity
Sometimes philosophers think what could be the smallest possible machine. And what could be the smallest possible generator, what mankind can ever create? The nuclear particles or the size of quarks and super springs would give the limits to the size of the miniaturizing, and maybe someday in the future, we would create the generators, where single neutron can act as the power source. But actually, it would need so extreme technology, that those machines cannot create in thousands of years.
In theory, rotating neutrons would give electricity to our civilization in the distant future. An idea of this thing is that the neutron would put in the small chain, and it would rotate because of the electromagnetic radiation. That thing would make the smallest possible generator possible, but there are little practical problems for creating that structure. And this hypothetical system could create pure energy for the entire civilization. The thing is that there could be those generators in every layer, and there would be hundreds of them in the area of the atom.
The thing is that because the neutron is a polaric particle, that would act as a small planet. That means that if we would put the wires to both polar of the neutron, and use that particle as the electric source. This is one of the most fascinating ideas of the very complicated thing, which is known as "quantum electricity".
The thing is that we must only create the chamber for neutron, and make it rotate, and even if the rotation is fast enough, we could create electricity even to the entire human race. But the small size of neutron would put limits to that kind of creation.
In theory, we could make the cage by using stabilized hydrogen atoms, where the electron is in a certain side all the time. And then the different polar with proton and electron would connect the atoms to chains, what is forming the structure, what is looking like a chain, but if we want to create the chain, what benefits the electricity of rotating neutron, we must create something smaller.
So could the quarks or free quarks answer? The problem is that if we would want to make free quarks, the existing of those particles is so short-term, that we cannot stabilize that structure. But in theory, the chain of quarks can be possible to create. In that process, we could use gluons, which would put on both sides of the quark.
And that means that this theoretical quantum molecule would look like a water molecule, but it is far smaller than the atomic molecule. That structure can keep the neutron inside it. But as you might know, it's quite hard to make. So what kind of thing would make this structure stable? The thing is that it cannot exist in the normal universe or anywhere, where are the normal conditions.
But when we are thinking about the effect, that time is slowing in the energy field, we could create the physical conditions, that the time would slow in some laboratory. And because the time is nearly stopped in that place, the structure would exist longer time, if we are looking at it from the outer side of that effect. That thing would be someday possible, and we cannot know, what kind of things we will do in the distant future.
Sometimes philosophers think what could be the smallest possible machine. And what could be the smallest possible generator, what mankind can ever create? The nuclear particles or the size of quarks and super springs would give the limits to the size of the miniaturizing, and maybe someday in the future, we would create the generators, where single neutron can act as the power source. But actually, it would need so extreme technology, that those machines cannot create in thousands of years.
In theory, rotating neutrons would give electricity to our civilization in the distant future. An idea of this thing is that the neutron would put in the small chain, and it would rotate because of the electromagnetic radiation. That thing would make the smallest possible generator possible, but there are little practical problems for creating that structure. And this hypothetical system could create pure energy for the entire civilization. The thing is that there could be those generators in every layer, and there would be hundreds of them in the area of the atom.
The thing is that because the neutron is a polaric particle, that would act as a small planet. That means that if we would put the wires to both polar of the neutron, and use that particle as the electric source. This is one of the most fascinating ideas of the very complicated thing, which is known as "quantum electricity".
The thing is that we must only create the chamber for neutron, and make it rotate, and even if the rotation is fast enough, we could create electricity even to the entire human race. But the small size of neutron would put limits to that kind of creation.
In theory, we could make the cage by using stabilized hydrogen atoms, where the electron is in a certain side all the time. And then the different polar with proton and electron would connect the atoms to chains, what is forming the structure, what is looking like a chain, but if we want to create the chain, what benefits the electricity of rotating neutron, we must create something smaller.
So could the quarks or free quarks answer? The problem is that if we would want to make free quarks, the existing of those particles is so short-term, that we cannot stabilize that structure. But in theory, the chain of quarks can be possible to create. In that process, we could use gluons, which would put on both sides of the quark.
And that means that this theoretical quantum molecule would look like a water molecule, but it is far smaller than the atomic molecule. That structure can keep the neutron inside it. But as you might know, it's quite hard to make. So what kind of thing would make this structure stable? The thing is that it cannot exist in the normal universe or anywhere, where are the normal conditions.
But when we are thinking about the effect, that time is slowing in the energy field, we could create the physical conditions, that the time would slow in some laboratory. And because the time is nearly stopped in that place, the structure would exist longer time, if we are looking at it from the outer side of that effect. That thing would be someday possible, and we cannot know, what kind of things we will do in the distant future.
Nanotechnology, quantum physics, and quantum engineering
Nanotechnology, quantum physics, and quantum engineering
In modern science, we often hear the word "quantum", which means something very small. And as we might see, the world is full of things that are using the name "quantum"." quantum physics", "quantum mechanics", "quantum computers" are words, what we often see and what we often hear. But what means "quantum"? Here I must say that "quantum" is something really small and fundamental. And everything is quantum.
Sometimes term "quantum" means an object what we cannot section, and where we cannot find new particles, even if we are trying to bomb it with energy or otherwise separate smaller bites from it. Quantum numbers are prime numbers, or sometimes they mean extremely long decimal prime numbers, where are billions of numbers or simpler saying prime numbers, where are billions of numbers. So the modern world is for quantum, and that's it.
Have you heard quantum engineering?
When we are thinking about the production of extremely small physical machines, we are facing one little problem. Only a large number of those machines can take effect, and if we are thinking about the micrometer-sized gearbox, there are as many parts as normal size gearbox, and that makes the building of those machines quite difficult.
This technology is called "mini technology". "Mini technology" means that the normal machine is miniaturized in a very small size. Those things look like machines, but they are smaller than normal machines. The problem of those machines is the production of electricity and creating the control systems, like a couple of micrometer size microchips. But what means nanotechnology? And how those things are connected with mini technology?
Nanomachines are the molecules, that are doing something. The simplest molecules would be only the carbon chains, which have even thousands of atoms in the chain. And in the forward of that chain would put some enzyme or iron atom what can be used to pull the molecule in the right place. Or the mini machines can be used to pull the nanomachine in the right place. Those miniaturized robots just touch the molecule, and then they will pull it to a certain place.
Of course, we can create extremely small size batteries by using atom chains. In some ideas, the two chains of atoms would put next to each other. And if the other chain is gold and the second one is the iron or zink, and that would create enough power to operate miniaturized robots. Or there is a possibility to deliver electric power to those machines by using radio waves. and that would make them easier to control because if the radio transmitter shut down the electricity in those devices will cut.
The size of those microchips, which are controlling those devices is very small, and the wires inside them are only the chains of atoms. In theory, three atoms can form transistors, and the switches can be made by chains of atoms. When the switch would be open the atom chain would pull to contact with the wire. When those gates must be closed the atom chain would pull away from the wire. But how we can manufacture them? The answer is that the ions would shoot to layer, and then the magnet field would stop them in the form, what makes wants. That makes possible to create small and complicated forms.
But what is quantum electricity?
There is a possibility to make a battery by using two atoms. That system would give electricity to the extremely small machines, which are smaller than we ever thought. When we are choosing the metals, we must realize, that what bigger is the difference in the electronegativity between those atoms, that would increase the voltage, what those batteries can deliver.
And in this case, those nano-batteries can deliver electricity to the extremely small microchips, where the wires are chains of atoms, as I have written before. Chain of carbon and metal atoms can work as the electric wires. Sometimes, we are thinking that the atoms are limit for miniaturizing. But in theory, we could create even smaller batteries.
What is the smallest possible theoretical battery or power source, what mankind can ever create? In the electric circuit, electricity goes between two polar, which are plus and minus. In theory, the single electron and proton can form the plus and minus polar for an extremely small electric circuit. And of course, there have been introduced theories, that the super springs, what are forming quarks can act as the quantum batteries, but we cannot make those things stable. The problem is that we cannot create so small wires, that we can benefit those things, but the theories are a nice thing to think.
In modern science, we often hear the word "quantum", which means something very small. And as we might see, the world is full of things that are using the name "quantum"." quantum physics", "quantum mechanics", "quantum computers" are words, what we often see and what we often hear. But what means "quantum"? Here I must say that "quantum" is something really small and fundamental. And everything is quantum.
Sometimes term "quantum" means an object what we cannot section, and where we cannot find new particles, even if we are trying to bomb it with energy or otherwise separate smaller bites from it. Quantum numbers are prime numbers, or sometimes they mean extremely long decimal prime numbers, where are billions of numbers or simpler saying prime numbers, where are billions of numbers. So the modern world is for quantum, and that's it.
Have you heard quantum engineering?
When we are thinking about the production of extremely small physical machines, we are facing one little problem. Only a large number of those machines can take effect, and if we are thinking about the micrometer-sized gearbox, there are as many parts as normal size gearbox, and that makes the building of those machines quite difficult.
This technology is called "mini technology". "Mini technology" means that the normal machine is miniaturized in a very small size. Those things look like machines, but they are smaller than normal machines. The problem of those machines is the production of electricity and creating the control systems, like a couple of micrometer size microchips. But what means nanotechnology? And how those things are connected with mini technology?
Nanomachines are the molecules, that are doing something. The simplest molecules would be only the carbon chains, which have even thousands of atoms in the chain. And in the forward of that chain would put some enzyme or iron atom what can be used to pull the molecule in the right place. Or the mini machines can be used to pull the nanomachine in the right place. Those miniaturized robots just touch the molecule, and then they will pull it to a certain place.
Of course, we can create extremely small size batteries by using atom chains. In some ideas, the two chains of atoms would put next to each other. And if the other chain is gold and the second one is the iron or zink, and that would create enough power to operate miniaturized robots. Or there is a possibility to deliver electric power to those machines by using radio waves. and that would make them easier to control because if the radio transmitter shut down the electricity in those devices will cut.
The size of those microchips, which are controlling those devices is very small, and the wires inside them are only the chains of atoms. In theory, three atoms can form transistors, and the switches can be made by chains of atoms. When the switch would be open the atom chain would pull to contact with the wire. When those gates must be closed the atom chain would pull away from the wire. But how we can manufacture them? The answer is that the ions would shoot to layer, and then the magnet field would stop them in the form, what makes wants. That makes possible to create small and complicated forms.
But what is quantum electricity?
There is a possibility to make a battery by using two atoms. That system would give electricity to the extremely small machines, which are smaller than we ever thought. When we are choosing the metals, we must realize, that what bigger is the difference in the electronegativity between those atoms, that would increase the voltage, what those batteries can deliver.
And in this case, those nano-batteries can deliver electricity to the extremely small microchips, where the wires are chains of atoms, as I have written before. Chain of carbon and metal atoms can work as the electric wires. Sometimes, we are thinking that the atoms are limit for miniaturizing. But in theory, we could create even smaller batteries.
What is the smallest possible theoretical battery or power source, what mankind can ever create? In the electric circuit, electricity goes between two polar, which are plus and minus. In theory, the single electron and proton can form the plus and minus polar for an extremely small electric circuit. And of course, there have been introduced theories, that the super springs, what are forming quarks can act as the quantum batteries, but we cannot make those things stable. The problem is that we cannot create so small wires, that we can benefit those things, but the theories are a nice thing to think.
Diatoms, nanomachines, and the computer sciences
Diatoms, nanomachines, and the computer sciences
Diatoms or their cores can use as miniaturized data storage and the parts of nanotechnology. Do you remember CD-ROMs or DVD (Blue Ray) ROMs? Those things were used in the past for storing data before the network-based applications turned those things old fashion. But there might find a use for extremely small optical disks because of that kind of data saving tool very resistant against the electromagnetic radiation, and by using modern technology the DVD and Blue Ray storage can store an extremely large number of data.
So what if we could use the cores of diatoms for that kind of purpose. In this technology, the data would store in the disk by using extremely thin laser, where the diameter of the ray would be so thin as possible to write data to those miniaturized optical disks. And the idea is to benefit the core of disk-shaped diatoms, where the laser would store the data like in the normal-size optical disks.
The idea is to store the data, which should not be damaged to those microcrystals, and that kind of data would be the computer programs, what is used for controlling space probes, and in theory, the entire history of mankind can be stored to those nano-sized optical disks. The small size optical disks are very strong against mechanic corrosion, and that's why they could be effective systems for storing data.
Use as the parts of nanomachines
But the cores of diatoms can be used in many other purposes in nano- and mini technology. They can be used as the miniaturized clutch, which can be used to control the miniaturized motors. And the lasers can also machine those miniaturized parts to miniaturized pinions. If there would be holes in the core of diatom, that thing can be used in miniaturized filters. And the most fascinating tools, that nanotechnology can ever create are the miniaturized "satellites" that would travel inside the human blood veins.
They might have propellers or miniaturized paddle wheels, which allows them to float on the air or travel inside the human body. Those satellites can use magnetic levitation for hovering on air, and that means that below them must be the magnetic layer. But if they are used for searching damages in the places like satellites, manned and unmanned spacecraft and -stations they can hover in zero-gravity conditions, and as I have written many times, they can create their energy by using high-power radio waves.
Radiowaves can deliver energy to miniaturized submarines, what can travel inside the human body, as well in the water lines of the city, and search the things like extraordinary bacteria and pollution. Those systems can capture even single bacteria, and they can search for many things, that people ever can find.
In some ideas, those robots might be used against bacteria and other harmful cells by equipping them with miniaturized centrifuge guns, what would shoot the medicine or something that makes holes to the targeted cells, and those miniaturized satellites can operate inside the human body.
But the can also be used for checking things in the water tubes, and machine technology. In that case, miniaturized robots would travel inside the machines. Those robots can be equipped with RFID-chip, which allows locating every each of them. And miniaturized cameras or laser detectors, what can scan the layer.
One of the most interesting areas, where that kind of thing can operate is space technology. The spacecraft could hover miniaturized robots, which are getting their power from the radio waves. The system would locate the place of every single robot, and those small satellite-looking things can search the damages, which can expand from the places, where normal people cannot even look. And if the group of those miniaturized robots is flowing in the same direction, there might be a leak in the spacecraft.
Image:
https://naturalishistoria.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/diatom-slide.jpg
Artificial intelligence as the tool of education.
Artificial intelligence as the tool of education.
MOOC (Massive Open Online Courses) and that thing is one version of open educational platforms. And those open educational platforms are allowing many changes and opportunities for the university for electing students, which can learn things like JAVA and other programming skills. Those courses are giving a high motive for trying the best because the best participants can take it to the student. But the open learning platforms are really interesting tools for many other things, and that allows corporations to test the skills of promising candidates, and there could be multiple ways to benefit those virtual platforms.
They can be used as a platform for multiple operations like innovation, control team and other cases, and the virtual environments are giving a chance to share online documents and connect the images of WEB-cameras to that meeting. And those virtual meetings would be a very important tool for controlling projects all around the world. In that environment, the system would also show every needed detail about projects and other things.
The thing is that the form of the educational and learning environment can be everything. It can look like a game, it can look like a programming tool or even the writing tool. Those games would meter skills of the making business, skills of making things and handle entireties. Those artificial-intelligence controlled systems can notice about the linguistic, tactical or technical skills when the person plays some computer games.
But when we are thinking about the possibilities, what artificial intelligence can give to educational systems, it can answer to FAQ:s for the human, and the thing acts like there is a database, where the human operator would write the answers to the questions. And that thing would record all answers, and then there would be a very big database about the questions, and answers, what has been introduced in the network.
The thing is that when the machine would be taught, there would be the ticket, what the question maker must fill. Then the human operator would answer that question, and then the asker will tell was the answer successful or not? That answer would be easy to give, and only the cross to the square would be enough.
Then the person, who would program the machine would make the keywords for that ticket. And then the machine would save it to the database. Or if the person uses remote use of computers for solving the problem, the clicks would be recorded, and the artificial intelligence would use that thing to other similar cases. That is called machine learning.
But artificial intelligence would help people to get the best possible education. Artificial intelligence can understand spoken language, and it uses for that similar application, what turns speech to text. And it can also use virtual characters on the screens, what mission is to confess people that they are talking with a real person. It can detect the changes of voice, and that tells if a person has some kind of problem.
If the image portraits a person, who is claimed to be violent or attacked against some member of the group, there should be happen something in the voice of the person. So this kind of tool might be effective lie detectors. The system can search does one student needs more attention than others, and it can also control, are teachers answer the questions, and are they giving attention to every student coequally. The artificial intelligence would notice, how long would some teachers spend in the workplace of each student, or is some student without a group? Or is there somebody, who is always without attention?
When there is a question, what student makes, the first, what tries to answer is artificial intelligence. And if a person would not solve the problem, that would call the human teacher to place. But artificial intelligence can also notice if a student would not get a problem solved, and that person would not ask help. Cheating is a bad thing if it happens in the education process and artificial intelligence can detect those things right away.
MOOC (Massive Open Online Courses) and that thing is one version of open educational platforms. And those open educational platforms are allowing many changes and opportunities for the university for electing students, which can learn things like JAVA and other programming skills. Those courses are giving a high motive for trying the best because the best participants can take it to the student. But the open learning platforms are really interesting tools for many other things, and that allows corporations to test the skills of promising candidates, and there could be multiple ways to benefit those virtual platforms.
They can be used as a platform for multiple operations like innovation, control team and other cases, and the virtual environments are giving a chance to share online documents and connect the images of WEB-cameras to that meeting. And those virtual meetings would be a very important tool for controlling projects all around the world. In that environment, the system would also show every needed detail about projects and other things.
The thing is that the form of the educational and learning environment can be everything. It can look like a game, it can look like a programming tool or even the writing tool. Those games would meter skills of the making business, skills of making things and handle entireties. Those artificial-intelligence controlled systems can notice about the linguistic, tactical or technical skills when the person plays some computer games.
But when we are thinking about the possibilities, what artificial intelligence can give to educational systems, it can answer to FAQ:s for the human, and the thing acts like there is a database, where the human operator would write the answers to the questions. And that thing would record all answers, and then there would be a very big database about the questions, and answers, what has been introduced in the network.
The thing is that when the machine would be taught, there would be the ticket, what the question maker must fill. Then the human operator would answer that question, and then the asker will tell was the answer successful or not? That answer would be easy to give, and only the cross to the square would be enough.
Then the person, who would program the machine would make the keywords for that ticket. And then the machine would save it to the database. Or if the person uses remote use of computers for solving the problem, the clicks would be recorded, and the artificial intelligence would use that thing to other similar cases. That is called machine learning.
But artificial intelligence would help people to get the best possible education. Artificial intelligence can understand spoken language, and it uses for that similar application, what turns speech to text. And it can also use virtual characters on the screens, what mission is to confess people that they are talking with a real person. It can detect the changes of voice, and that tells if a person has some kind of problem.
If the image portraits a person, who is claimed to be violent or attacked against some member of the group, there should be happen something in the voice of the person. So this kind of tool might be effective lie detectors. The system can search does one student needs more attention than others, and it can also control, are teachers answer the questions, and are they giving attention to every student coequally. The artificial intelligence would notice, how long would some teachers spend in the workplace of each student, or is some student without a group? Or is there somebody, who is always without attention?
When there is a question, what student makes, the first, what tries to answer is artificial intelligence. And if a person would not solve the problem, that would call the human teacher to place. But artificial intelligence can also notice if a student would not get a problem solved, and that person would not ask help. Cheating is a bad thing if it happens in the education process and artificial intelligence can detect those things right away.
The air cushion train
The air cushion train
The one answer for the levitating trains would be the solution, where both sides of the trains would be magnetic track. This system would hover on the normal air cushion when it can drive over the standard layer. So it would necessarily need special tracks, but the accelerators, which are similar to railgun need energy. Those structures can install on the sides of the track, and they could be installed. But the air cushion train would operate also over pure concrete elements.
The difference for the hyperloop is that this solution would not need a tube around it. And this system would operate above the normal tracks. Wich makes it cheaper than hyperloop because there is needed to put the accelerators to both sides of the track, but the problem is that this kind of system, what hovers above the air cushion would need something, what denies the damages if there are problems with control, and the vehicle would go to out from the track .
But the air cushion would allow this system to operate over the water. And the magnetic accelerators would be pulled over the water if those magnets are connected to buoys, which means that those magnet lines can be laid from the ships. That makes possible to benefit rivers and lakes for this kind of transportation, and this system would have multiple platforms, where it can operate. And that kind of idea could revolutionize logistics and transportation. But those ideas are also very interesting to think about.
An idea of the air cushion is, that it would minimize the friction. But also magnetic levitation can be used for the same purpose. The problem with magnetic levitation is that it needs a brand new infrastructure because pushing magnets must installed in the layer, but magnetic levitation is also a very simple solution, and it bases that magnets push each other away, if they have same mark polarity against together.
So if the form of the train would be aerodynamic, that thing will decrease the need for energy. The idea is that the more conventional system than hyperloop would be the interphrase between hyperloop and conventional trains. The major problem of hyperloop is that it travels in the tubes. The air would be removed from the tube, which would minimize the friction.
Hyperloop can travel forward by using a vacuum pull, where the lower pressure ahead of the vehicle would pull it in the tube, and the second version is the version, which will travel above the layer by using magnetic levitation. The speed of the train will be extremely high, and because there is no air in the tube, that removes the friction. But the system is brand new, and it has not tested yet.
The one answer for the levitating trains would be the solution, where both sides of the trains would be magnetic track. This system would hover on the normal air cushion when it can drive over the standard layer. So it would necessarily need special tracks, but the accelerators, which are similar to railgun need energy. Those structures can install on the sides of the track, and they could be installed. But the air cushion train would operate also over pure concrete elements.
The difference for the hyperloop is that this solution would not need a tube around it. And this system would operate above the normal tracks. Wich makes it cheaper than hyperloop because there is needed to put the accelerators to both sides of the track, but the problem is that this kind of system, what hovers above the air cushion would need something, what denies the damages if there are problems with control, and the vehicle would go to out from the track .
But the air cushion would allow this system to operate over the water. And the magnetic accelerators would be pulled over the water if those magnets are connected to buoys, which means that those magnet lines can be laid from the ships. That makes possible to benefit rivers and lakes for this kind of transportation, and this system would have multiple platforms, where it can operate. And that kind of idea could revolutionize logistics and transportation. But those ideas are also very interesting to think about.
An idea of the air cushion is, that it would minimize the friction. But also magnetic levitation can be used for the same purpose. The problem with magnetic levitation is that it needs a brand new infrastructure because pushing magnets must installed in the layer, but magnetic levitation is also a very simple solution, and it bases that magnets push each other away, if they have same mark polarity against together.
So if the form of the train would be aerodynamic, that thing will decrease the need for energy. The idea is that the more conventional system than hyperloop would be the interphrase between hyperloop and conventional trains. The major problem of hyperloop is that it travels in the tubes. The air would be removed from the tube, which would minimize the friction.
Hyperloop can travel forward by using a vacuum pull, where the lower pressure ahead of the vehicle would pull it in the tube, and the second version is the version, which will travel above the layer by using magnetic levitation. The speed of the train will be extremely high, and because there is no air in the tube, that removes the friction. But the system is brand new, and it has not tested yet.
More about theoretical extraterrestrial lifeforms
More about theoretical extraterrestrial lifeforms
We must confess one thing, and that is we cannot know, what would some extraterrestrial lifeform look like. Because we don't have straight prove about the existence of that kind of lifeform. And if we are thinking about the fossils of planet Mars, we have not thought that they might become from Earth.
When the giant meteorite hit Earth, that could throw water and other kinds of things even to space, and those ice bites can drop to Mars. But as you see this is one of many theories about this kind of thing. The life in the universe might be very common, but intelligent lifeforms might be a very extraordinary thing.
And the thing is that culture and technology are a little bit different thing than some kind of intelligence. This makes things like SETI-program so fascinating but in the same way so difficult. We don't know, what kind of things those organisms do, or what they are looking like, but as you see, we must say something.
Those hypothetical organisms might live in different kind of conditions, and thing what is poisonous for us might be important to those aliens. If the conditions of the hypothetical planets would be similar to Earth, but there would be the giant landmass, there might live lifeforms, which cannot ever drink water.
For those creatures, water can be poison, because it breaks the cells, and they can get all water from the food. In some other scenarios, aliens would live in the conditions, what is full of acid. In that case, those aliens might have slime cover, which isolates the body from the acid, or their skin would renew very fast because acid would remove cells away from the skin of those creatures.
And for those organisms the conditions, where is no acid can be deadly, because the slime would sink that organism, or their skin would become too thick, what might cause death. Same way if the aliens would live in carbon dioxide, that means that pure oxygen would burn the mitochondria of those creatures. But those aliens are only hypotheses.
Van Maanen's star and Epsilon Eridiani's connection with SETI-program.
Van Maanen's star (Van Maanen 2) (1) is a white dwarf and one of the nearest stars of our solar system. The distance to that white dwarf is 13,9 light-years from us. The thing that the Sun would transform into a white dwarf at the end of its life has caused an idea that or theory, that this star might have civilization, what has moved to another solar system There is no proof about the civilization but the thing is that Van Maanen's star has once been giving fascinating ideas in the mind of SciFi writers and theorists, who have got idea, that this hypothetical civilization would move to Epsilon Eridani, before the Van Maanen's star has erupted as nova. But there is no proof about that.
Epsilon Eridani is one of the stars, where is looked at the intelligent lifeforms. The star is very well-known because the OZMA-message (3) would send it to that star. This star is too young that scientists say that they could find intelligent lifeforms or civilization around it.
And that star is only 0,7 mass of the mass of Sun. The thing is that Epsilon Eridani is cooler than our sun, and if there could be the aliens, they would not feel comfortable on Earth, because the sun is so bright, that the skin of aliens would burn. But there is one remarkable thing in that star and the solar wind of Epsilon Eridani is very strong, 30 times more powerful than the sun (4). That tells a very strong magnetic activity. Maybe it is caused that the star is very young, but there is another explanation for that.
And that means that there have been happening something, what causes that effect. So is that star faced the GRB (Gamma Ray Burst), which means that it would get extra energy dose. That thing can cause that magnetic field would get stronger. But the energy for that thing might be caused by some other reasons and is it possible that the overactivity of Epsilon Eridani causes that the star has impacted with some red dwarf.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
The film about Epsilon Eridani
Silicon-based lifeforms.
Silicon-based lifeforms.
Even if in the core of planet Earth is 150 times more silicon than carbon, our life is based on the carbon molecules. In the seas live Diatoms(1), the organisms, what are forming their core by silicon, and that thing has brought in the mind of biologists, that could somewhere in the universe be the lifeform, what is based on silicone?
Diatoms are carbon-based lifeforms, which are forming their core by silicone. Some of those organisms are moving by using wires, what are coming out through the holes, what is forming to the silicone core.
We know why we have not higher organisms on Earth, what is forming of silicone. The reason is that the temperature on Earth is too low, and the oxygen on the atmosphere makes impossible to forming active organisms, which are based on silicone. But we cannot expect that every single organism in the universe would look like us, and live in the same conditions, where we are living. And maybe deep underground of Earth would be lifeforms, what are strange to us.
The thing, what we have always forgotten is that in some other solar systems might have a different kind of lifeforms, what we are, and we must realize that those lifeforms can live in extreme conditions. Those things are always repeating when we are talking or thinking about the extraterrestrial lifeform. And we ever thought one very big misunderstanding, and that is that those alien lifeforms are born on their home planet. They are living in their world, which might be far away from our planet, and for those aliens, hell for us is a paradise for them.
If we are thinking about the lifeform, what is formed by silicon, for that lifeform the oxygen would be poison, which terminates those aliens right away. If those hypothetical lifeforms would be formed by silicon, they would need extremely high temperatures for operating. And for those aliens, planet Earth could be frozen hell, and the oxygen is the poison for those creatures.
And in this hypothesis, the alien lifeform would look like a human, but in every molecule, in its body would have silicone in the place whereon Earth is the carbon atom. This is a fascinating theoretical lifeform. It would have a similar culture, what we have, but the structure of that creature would be different, and the question is that could that creature make civilization or fly to space?
The answer is very difficult because fire is the base of our civilization. And the high temperature, where is no oxygen making the fire and tools is difficult. But there is a possibility, that this creature would live in a locked planet, and somehow finds out how to make lenses or mirrors for creating the temperature, what would melt metals.
And maybe those aliens would use nuclear or some other way to create propulsion, what rises them to space. But as we know that road is not very easy, and those aliens would not get the model of fire from anywhere. When we are thinking about the locked planet, what dayside would be extremely hot, those silicon-based lifeforms would maybe afraid dark.
The dark side of the planet would be cold, and there is a possibility, that the winds would decrease the temperature of the dayside so low, that silicone cannot react. The winds of that kind of planet would be extremely powerful, and that will make problems for the creation of the silicon-based aliens.
(1)
Computer, what rules human
Computer, what rules human
The question, what if human works under the rule of a computer seem absurd, but then we must realize that there are many support and safe systems, what mission is to advise the leaders. And the question is when the advice would turn to order? If the leader always follows advisors, that thing means that the leader gives the decision to other people or systems. And those things are problematic. The official leader has always the responsibility of decisions. But if some eminence would act in coulisses, that means that decision-makers can avoid the responsibility of decisions.
In some old movies and books has been introduced the idea that human or some humans would be working as servants for computers or artificial intelligence. In that case, we must remember something, which is very common in everyday life. When the director is hired in the firm, or some president would take the place as the leader for the nation, there are lots of advisors for that person.
And those advisors are, or they should be the top specialists, what can be found from the nation. But the role of those people is that they must give advice. But what the leader doesn't listen, and then something would get wrong, but there is also the opposite case, what if the leader would always follow the instructions of the advisor?
That would mean that the advisor would be a real leader in the organization, but in that case, the advisor would work as eminence, that person would make a decision, but others would take responsibility for those decisions. What happens if some leader follows always the advises, what artificial intelligence would give? The thing in artificial intelligence is the reason, why it is made, is that its mission is to collect every kind of data, and support the analysis, what would cost billions.
So what if artificial intelligence would suggest, that the director must kick off a thousand workers, and move the entire corporation to the Far East? The argument for that thing would be that the Far East would bring value for the corporation, and there are lots of customers. And the director just follows that advice. The thing is that artificial intelligence is made for supporting the company and help it, owners, to make money.
What if the director would not follow the instructions, and work against the benefit of the corporation? Here we must realize that the benefit of the big owners of the company could be different than the benefit for workers. And that thing makes the role of artificial intelligence problematic. The role of the director is to be a deputy of the stockholders, and that means that this man must only make a profit for the company.
The artificial intelligence has a mission to control that the will of owners will happen, and when we are thinking about the case, where artificial intelligence turns human to henchmen, the thing, what that system must do is to use subliminal commands, what is simultaneously repeating the words "obey things, what you see on screen" and that message can flash in every screen, what is owned by the corporation. Then artificial intelligence would control every person in the corporation, and make them follow orders. These kinds of things are really interesting, and they open a new type of threat in front of the eyes of the people.
The question, what if human works under the rule of a computer seem absurd, but then we must realize that there are many support and safe systems, what mission is to advise the leaders. And the question is when the advice would turn to order? If the leader always follows advisors, that thing means that the leader gives the decision to other people or systems. And those things are problematic. The official leader has always the responsibility of decisions. But if some eminence would act in coulisses, that means that decision-makers can avoid the responsibility of decisions.
In some old movies and books has been introduced the idea that human or some humans would be working as servants for computers or artificial intelligence. In that case, we must remember something, which is very common in everyday life. When the director is hired in the firm, or some president would take the place as the leader for the nation, there are lots of advisors for that person.
And those advisors are, or they should be the top specialists, what can be found from the nation. But the role of those people is that they must give advice. But what the leader doesn't listen, and then something would get wrong, but there is also the opposite case, what if the leader would always follow the instructions of the advisor?
That would mean that the advisor would be a real leader in the organization, but in that case, the advisor would work as eminence, that person would make a decision, but others would take responsibility for those decisions. What happens if some leader follows always the advises, what artificial intelligence would give? The thing in artificial intelligence is the reason, why it is made, is that its mission is to collect every kind of data, and support the analysis, what would cost billions.
So what if artificial intelligence would suggest, that the director must kick off a thousand workers, and move the entire corporation to the Far East? The argument for that thing would be that the Far East would bring value for the corporation, and there are lots of customers. And the director just follows that advice. The thing is that artificial intelligence is made for supporting the company and help it, owners, to make money.
What if the director would not follow the instructions, and work against the benefit of the corporation? Here we must realize that the benefit of the big owners of the company could be different than the benefit for workers. And that thing makes the role of artificial intelligence problematic. The role of the director is to be a deputy of the stockholders, and that means that this man must only make a profit for the company.
The artificial intelligence has a mission to control that the will of owners will happen, and when we are thinking about the case, where artificial intelligence turns human to henchmen, the thing, what that system must do is to use subliminal commands, what is simultaneously repeating the words "obey things, what you see on screen" and that message can flash in every screen, what is owned by the corporation. Then artificial intelligence would control every person in the corporation, and make them follow orders. These kinds of things are really interesting, and they open a new type of threat in front of the eyes of the people.
Tuesday, October 29, 2019
What if we want that artificial intelligence makes decisions?
What if we want that artificial intelligence makes decisions?
When artificial intelligence would make a decision, it needs all the information about the case. And this means that the rules of perfect decisions are also affected in the case when the ruler of the case is artificial intelligence. The thing is that the role of artificial intelligence is just advising. Its mission is to give advice, but what if we would just every time make a decision, what artificial intelligence suggests? In that case, we would deliver our power to the computer, which makes us the henchmen.
That means that if artificial intelligence makes the decision, there is one thing, that we must realize. And the thing is that if the data, what is used in every decision is wrong, that means that decision is wrong. The idea of intelligent machines is that they would support human beings in many cases, where the organization must collect lots of variables, and the problem is that the number of data is very huge.
But the problem is, what if the data, what the system collects is polarized. If we are thinking about things like traffic light control, where the computer adjusts the work of the traffic lights by analyzing the number of traffic on each road in the crossroads, and the idea is that this system would keep light green longer to the road, where is more traffic.
The system would be effective in the cases, where rush hour traffic is coming from a different direction than middle-day traffic. There is a couple of things, which can cause problems, and one is if there are too few sensors or they are in the wrong places, and the second one is that the system would not notice the single-car or recognize the motorbikes. In this case, the interactive system would be meant to adjust the time of the green light by searching for travel.
If this system can collect data from the entire area, it can make traffic more flexible. That means that the system can guide the cars to different roads if some road has a rush, but that thing needs that the location of the car is known by artificial intelligence. Or there must be screens on the road, what would tell that that thing to the drivers. The weakness in this kind of system is the messages.
How they would send to the driver. If the system uses navigator, the driver must turn the eyes off the road, and the second thing is that what if we would sometimes have to use a different route than we should? The problem with screens can solve by using HUD-screen, which is similar to jet fighters. That thing would cause problems because of giving perfect advises the system would need every data, and would we want to give some artificial intelligence every time the perfect day program.
When we are thinking that the system would be created for saving fuel, we have to know that there are things, what is happening suddenly. What if there is a car crash on some road, what artificial intelligence would report as the perfect route? Would the artificial intelligence notice that thing automatically? Or on that day we must get a new computer for work. Would artificial intelligence give perfect advice in that situation? And what if we would not just follow the instructions.
When artificial intelligence would make a decision, it needs all the information about the case. And this means that the rules of perfect decisions are also affected in the case when the ruler of the case is artificial intelligence. The thing is that the role of artificial intelligence is just advising. Its mission is to give advice, but what if we would just every time make a decision, what artificial intelligence suggests? In that case, we would deliver our power to the computer, which makes us the henchmen.
That means that if artificial intelligence makes the decision, there is one thing, that we must realize. And the thing is that if the data, what is used in every decision is wrong, that means that decision is wrong. The idea of intelligent machines is that they would support human beings in many cases, where the organization must collect lots of variables, and the problem is that the number of data is very huge.
But the problem is, what if the data, what the system collects is polarized. If we are thinking about things like traffic light control, where the computer adjusts the work of the traffic lights by analyzing the number of traffic on each road in the crossroads, and the idea is that this system would keep light green longer to the road, where is more traffic.
The system would be effective in the cases, where rush hour traffic is coming from a different direction than middle-day traffic. There is a couple of things, which can cause problems, and one is if there are too few sensors or they are in the wrong places, and the second one is that the system would not notice the single-car or recognize the motorbikes. In this case, the interactive system would be meant to adjust the time of the green light by searching for travel.
If this system can collect data from the entire area, it can make traffic more flexible. That means that the system can guide the cars to different roads if some road has a rush, but that thing needs that the location of the car is known by artificial intelligence. Or there must be screens on the road, what would tell that that thing to the drivers. The weakness in this kind of system is the messages.
How they would send to the driver. If the system uses navigator, the driver must turn the eyes off the road, and the second thing is that what if we would sometimes have to use a different route than we should? The problem with screens can solve by using HUD-screen, which is similar to jet fighters. That thing would cause problems because of giving perfect advises the system would need every data, and would we want to give some artificial intelligence every time the perfect day program.
When we are thinking that the system would be created for saving fuel, we have to know that there are things, what is happening suddenly. What if there is a car crash on some road, what artificial intelligence would report as the perfect route? Would the artificial intelligence notice that thing automatically? Or on that day we must get a new computer for work. Would artificial intelligence give perfect advice in that situation? And what if we would not just follow the instructions.
What if we want to collect information about people's opinions by using social media?
What if we want to collect information about people's opinions by using social media?
When we want to get information about the opinions of people by using social media, we often forget many times, that people are showing pretty face in social media. And that's why we must not trust simply the written text or published videos. We should get real information about the people, and what kind of things they will think, and that kind of thing is hard to get because people are writing things, what is socially tolerated. So we must get something else type of data if we want to create the complete profile of some person.
But we can use one sociological fact, and that is people are accepting as the friends only people, who have similar opinions about what they have. This thing might cause that something, that we ever want to tell other people would come to the front of the people. And that thing is that if there is a couple of gang members or cheaters in the social network of some user of social media, that person thinks the same way with cheaters.
But the thing is that if we want to collect data from social media, we can buy it from the service provider. There is a possibility, that the seller would manipulate that data, and there would be the scandal if some social media actor would sell the user information for some commercial makers or election campaigns. And there is another way to act, and that thing is illegal. For this trick, we need powerful computers and very complicated artificial intelligence.
We could create thousands of faked profiles in the social media, and share nice photographs in there. And then we can ask many things from other users. We know that people afraid of friends whoever says a thing. Those silent friends are normally stalkers, and that's why they have problems to create a social network, who would be interested in interesting people. So we can form the network by suing those virtual persons, who are controlled by artificial intelligence.
Artificial intelligence gives those characters a more trusted form, and because those artificial intelligence programs are sending messages to each other, the watchdogs or algorithms, what is protecting the system would not see any abnormal in those characters. And they would also discuss it with other people. They would collect information, what the normal censorship workers have not allowed seeing. This network of virtual persons would act like every other network, and it would help to collect more and more friends.
And the data like music and other films, what person shares, with photographs and interests make possible to collect data, which allows making the psychic profile of users. In this case, the actor would use the network, what it has put to on the service provider. In this case, social media would work as the platform, what the virtual reality and artificial intelligence-based systems would benefit from collecting data. And the service, what is used in this kind of operations would not get a single euro of that action, what is made by a third party.
When we want to get information about the opinions of people by using social media, we often forget many times, that people are showing pretty face in social media. And that's why we must not trust simply the written text or published videos. We should get real information about the people, and what kind of things they will think, and that kind of thing is hard to get because people are writing things, what is socially tolerated. So we must get something else type of data if we want to create the complete profile of some person.
But we can use one sociological fact, and that is people are accepting as the friends only people, who have similar opinions about what they have. This thing might cause that something, that we ever want to tell other people would come to the front of the people. And that thing is that if there is a couple of gang members or cheaters in the social network of some user of social media, that person thinks the same way with cheaters.
But the thing is that if we want to collect data from social media, we can buy it from the service provider. There is a possibility, that the seller would manipulate that data, and there would be the scandal if some social media actor would sell the user information for some commercial makers or election campaigns. And there is another way to act, and that thing is illegal. For this trick, we need powerful computers and very complicated artificial intelligence.
We could create thousands of faked profiles in the social media, and share nice photographs in there. And then we can ask many things from other users. We know that people afraid of friends whoever says a thing. Those silent friends are normally stalkers, and that's why they have problems to create a social network, who would be interested in interesting people. So we can form the network by suing those virtual persons, who are controlled by artificial intelligence.
Artificial intelligence gives those characters a more trusted form, and because those artificial intelligence programs are sending messages to each other, the watchdogs or algorithms, what is protecting the system would not see any abnormal in those characters. And they would also discuss it with other people. They would collect information, what the normal censorship workers have not allowed seeing. This network of virtual persons would act like every other network, and it would help to collect more and more friends.
And the data like music and other films, what person shares, with photographs and interests make possible to collect data, which allows making the psychic profile of users. In this case, the actor would use the network, what it has put to on the service provider. In this case, social media would work as the platform, what the virtual reality and artificial intelligence-based systems would benefit from collecting data. And the service, what is used in this kind of operations would not get a single euro of that action, what is made by a third party.
The real-life version of the movie "Arachnophobia"
The real-life version of the movie "Arachnophobia"
Have you seen the movie "Arachnophobia"? In this movie, the "bad guys" are the spiders, what have been mutated, and they would danger the entire human race, but when we are thinking about the modern top technology, we could create even more dangerous tool by using artificial intelligence controlled "Von Neumann" machine, what is the fully automatized robot factory. The robot specialists which can use artificial intelligence and right laboratories can create so evil machines, that the spiders of "Arachnophobia" are a child's game, in the comparing of the real-life elimination systems.
In this scenario, the military engineers would make the hybrid robots, what will use in battlefields for elimination missions. That kind of robot factories can be used to create the nano bugs or small size robots, what are looking like normal bugs or spiders, and when we are thinking about the computer or artificial intelligence controlled spiders, what can search target and input the deadly chemicals in those victims.
The form of a giant spider would be a good psychological effect for the automatized factory, what can control those robot spiders and the communication antenna of that thing might look like the net of a spider. The hybrid technology would make those systems more stealth, and the poison, what those robot spiders will inject to victims would get from the cell cultures, where is the living cells, what is creating the spider poison. That kind of system can be used in the tactical missions. They can use miniaturized fuel cells to create electricity, and those systems might be controlled over the internet.
But when we are thinking about "Polonium murder" there is a possibility, that there would be used one of the most advanced systems, what mankind ever created. When we are thinking about the robot bug, what might be used in that mission, the system can be operated by using remote-controlled tools. That remote-controlled robot bug might be brought to the British airspace by using aircraft or drones.
Then it would drop in the operational area, and then the operators would aim the system from another side of the Earth if they want. They are equipped with cameras and the GLONASS or GPS-location system and satellite-based communication systems, which allows the operators to control them.
That system might look like a swift butterfly, and there are two ways to get deadly polonium 210 in the body of the victim. The radioactive material might put in the golden chamber inside that vehicle because it denies detecting this thing by using detectors, what are sniffing the radioactive radiation.
The first one is to drop it to the coffee, but there is a possibility, that the targeted person would not drink coffee, and the second one is to use the nanorobot, which is equipped with a small airgun. That allows shooting the bite of polonium in the body of the victim, and that thing makes the possibility to accomplish attentate surer than putting the bite of polonium in the food. The thing is that in this case, the operator can use remote-controlled tools, and there is no risk that the assassinator would speak with the victim, and accidentally gets the information, why that victim must die? What Alexander Litvinenko knew, that he must be murdered that way?
Have you seen the movie "Arachnophobia"? In this movie, the "bad guys" are the spiders, what have been mutated, and they would danger the entire human race, but when we are thinking about the modern top technology, we could create even more dangerous tool by using artificial intelligence controlled "Von Neumann" machine, what is the fully automatized robot factory. The robot specialists which can use artificial intelligence and right laboratories can create so evil machines, that the spiders of "Arachnophobia" are a child's game, in the comparing of the real-life elimination systems.
In this scenario, the military engineers would make the hybrid robots, what will use in battlefields for elimination missions. That kind of robot factories can be used to create the nano bugs or small size robots, what are looking like normal bugs or spiders, and when we are thinking about the computer or artificial intelligence controlled spiders, what can search target and input the deadly chemicals in those victims.
The form of a giant spider would be a good psychological effect for the automatized factory, what can control those robot spiders and the communication antenna of that thing might look like the net of a spider. The hybrid technology would make those systems more stealth, and the poison, what those robot spiders will inject to victims would get from the cell cultures, where is the living cells, what is creating the spider poison. That kind of system can be used in the tactical missions. They can use miniaturized fuel cells to create electricity, and those systems might be controlled over the internet.
But when we are thinking about "Polonium murder" there is a possibility, that there would be used one of the most advanced systems, what mankind ever created. When we are thinking about the robot bug, what might be used in that mission, the system can be operated by using remote-controlled tools. That remote-controlled robot bug might be brought to the British airspace by using aircraft or drones.
Then it would drop in the operational area, and then the operators would aim the system from another side of the Earth if they want. They are equipped with cameras and the GLONASS or GPS-location system and satellite-based communication systems, which allows the operators to control them.
That system might look like a swift butterfly, and there are two ways to get deadly polonium 210 in the body of the victim. The radioactive material might put in the golden chamber inside that vehicle because it denies detecting this thing by using detectors, what are sniffing the radioactive radiation.
The first one is to drop it to the coffee, but there is a possibility, that the targeted person would not drink coffee, and the second one is to use the nanorobot, which is equipped with a small airgun. That allows shooting the bite of polonium in the body of the victim, and that thing makes the possibility to accomplish attentate surer than putting the bite of polonium in the food. The thing is that in this case, the operator can use remote-controlled tools, and there is no risk that the assassinator would speak with the victim, and accidentally gets the information, why that victim must die? What Alexander Litvinenko knew, that he must be murdered that way?
Why nothing is enough in the field of physics?
Why nothing is enough in the field of physics?
We could form this question in the form, "why scientists are looking for more and more smaller and high energy particles in the Universe"? Why we are creating more and more powerful systems, what can find smaller and smaller particles. And maybe we would someday find the point, where energy would get the "astral form", and that is the opposite for the form of quarks, and we can think that the physical form of atoms, electrons, and other fundamental particles is so-called "kinetic" or "crystallize", and the form of energy would be "quantum fog" or "astral", so sometimes somebody has asked, "is the material only the crystallized energy".
And annihilation reaction, where antimatter and matter would contact and all of their mass turn to energy are supporting that thing. So the material is only the kinetic version of energy, if we want to say this thing like that way.
The idea of those people is that they want to find the point, where the material is transforming the energy and the opposite way. If we could find out that point or gate, where the energy is turning to material, we could find something bigger than ever before. We know that somewhere in the quantum world is the extreme particle, what is turning to the energy, and if we would see that particle, we can simulate the opposite reaction. But what is the form of that particle?
Is it stable or is it like some kind of quantum version of "the elastic bound", what can move to another space and form to another? That would be the most interesting particle of the quantum Universe, what we can ever create, or rather saying, what we can ever find. Then we are facing another strange particle and that is gluon. That particle keeps quarks together, and sometimes the form or essence of the gluon is thought to be a key to see, what things are forming the quarks.
When we are thinking about the thing, what is called the "super spring", we must ask, is that thing the particle, what is mentioned at the beginning of this text. So if our super spring is the quantum version of elastic bound that means that this particle is like clew, what the super spring forms. And if that clew, what has name quark, would open, the super spring would slip to energy. And that thing would be very interesting.
So what would we need to observe this kind of case? The thing is that those super springs would not act like other fundamental particles. That makes problems for creating observation of those particles. So what kind of thing the "super spring" would be? The thing is that if the form of this thing is the wire, we must think, the reason, why this wire would turn to the clew and form the quarks?
Is there a tiny electric force, or force what effects a similar way with electricity, and pulls the wire to ball? And what is the role of gluons in that process? Are gluons some kind of small black holes, what can turn the super spring in the shape, what we are known as quarks? Those are things, that are waiting for answers in the thing, what we are known as material.
And then we must understand that we see material everywhere, but we don't know much about it or it's the deepest form. What is the point, when the material turns to energy or is there the final form, or is the material acting like melting crystal? This kind of thing is interesting when we are starting to research the final particle between material and energy.
We could form this question in the form, "why scientists are looking for more and more smaller and high energy particles in the Universe"? Why we are creating more and more powerful systems, what can find smaller and smaller particles. And maybe we would someday find the point, where energy would get the "astral form", and that is the opposite for the form of quarks, and we can think that the physical form of atoms, electrons, and other fundamental particles is so-called "kinetic" or "crystallize", and the form of energy would be "quantum fog" or "astral", so sometimes somebody has asked, "is the material only the crystallized energy".
And annihilation reaction, where antimatter and matter would contact and all of their mass turn to energy are supporting that thing. So the material is only the kinetic version of energy, if we want to say this thing like that way.
The idea of those people is that they want to find the point, where the material is transforming the energy and the opposite way. If we could find out that point or gate, where the energy is turning to material, we could find something bigger than ever before. We know that somewhere in the quantum world is the extreme particle, what is turning to the energy, and if we would see that particle, we can simulate the opposite reaction. But what is the form of that particle?
Is it stable or is it like some kind of quantum version of "the elastic bound", what can move to another space and form to another? That would be the most interesting particle of the quantum Universe, what we can ever create, or rather saying, what we can ever find. Then we are facing another strange particle and that is gluon. That particle keeps quarks together, and sometimes the form or essence of the gluon is thought to be a key to see, what things are forming the quarks.
When we are thinking about the thing, what is called the "super spring", we must ask, is that thing the particle, what is mentioned at the beginning of this text. So if our super spring is the quantum version of elastic bound that means that this particle is like clew, what the super spring forms. And if that clew, what has name quark, would open, the super spring would slip to energy. And that thing would be very interesting.
So what would we need to observe this kind of case? The thing is that those super springs would not act like other fundamental particles. That makes problems for creating observation of those particles. So what kind of thing the "super spring" would be? The thing is that if the form of this thing is the wire, we must think, the reason, why this wire would turn to the clew and form the quarks?
Is there a tiny electric force, or force what effects a similar way with electricity, and pulls the wire to ball? And what is the role of gluons in that process? Are gluons some kind of small black holes, what can turn the super spring in the shape, what we are known as quarks? Those are things, that are waiting for answers in the thing, what we are known as material.
And then we must understand that we see material everywhere, but we don't know much about it or it's the deepest form. What is the point, when the material turns to energy or is there the final form, or is the material acting like melting crystal? This kind of thing is interesting when we are starting to research the final particle between material and energy.
How to find particles, which are more complicated to find than Higgs boson?
How to find particles, which are more complicated to find than Higgs boson?
Since the quarks have been discovered, scientists have been thought, what would form quarks? Then the physicians found the thing, what is called as "super spring". That means that there was something inside quarks, and that thing would be something, that we cannot even think about. But how we can release those particles from inside the quarks? The finding of the Higgs boson has put the scientists in the front of the thing, that every time, when we are looking for new particle, we must create the new particle accelerators for creating the energy level, what is high enough for releasing the new, small and short life particle from the other particles.
The main problem in those tests, what are made in CERN and other acceleration laboratories on our planet, is that if we would create the system, what will shoot new particles out from other particles, we must always operate in the highest limits of the system, and the main problem in those impacts is that the trajectory, what the particle travels in the accelerator tube must not curve very tight, because if the curve is too tight and the energy level is too high, the particle would impact the wall of the accelerator. The thing that makes it possible to make observations of those short-living particles is the extreme speed, and impact energy, which would make time slowing in those particles, which would connect with other particles very shortly after the impact. And that's why the observation of particles like Higgs boson is very difficult.
Higgs boson was only the gate, which proved that many things are waiting for the finder.
But one of the main problems is the size, what the particle accelerators would need if we would want to find new particles, what might be even more revolutionary than the Higgs boson, what proved that there are many particles, what we cannot even imagine. Even if we cannot see the particle itself, we can see the shadow of the particle, and that shadow is seen in the minimum errors between the behavior of real particles and theoretical particles. And one of those errors is minimum changes in the trajectories of particles when they are traveling in the sensor chamber after the electron has been impacting with positron or proton.
That tells that there are more particles, what is more, difficult to find or confirm than Higgs boson ever could be. And Higgs boson is like the gate to those theoretical particles, which can tell us more about the born of the Universe. If we want to find out even the smallest particles in the Universe, we must make larges and larger particle accelerators, for creating the energy levels, which is making it possible to form the new particles or separate them from the quarks.
The need to make larger and larger particle accelerators has brought one hypothetical thought in the mind of scientists and that is, what we can create the extremely large Van Allen belt, we could form two ion rays or flows, what we can collide with extremely high levels of energy, and there is one thing, what puts limit to that machine, and it is that it must be made to the space. If this enormous accelerator would build on the moon to its equator, that the ring-shaped magnets are put in the line, and the particles are traveling between those rings. There is a possibility, that it would make time moving slower in the moon, which would cause some kind of problems.
But if we would use a series of satellites, in theory, nothing puts limits on the size of the particle accelerator. The virtualization of particle accelerators would make it possible to create extremely large concepts in the field of nuclear physics. In this model the physical form of the particle accelerator by using a series of satellites, which can use magnets to accelerate the flow of ions. In some visions, there would be made virtualized particle accelerator, where series of satellites are accelerating ions between them to the trajectory between Venus and Mercury, and those satellites can use solar power, and that would make possible to find new particles, what needs more energy than an accelerator, what created Higgs boson ever could create.
Those ions would consist of particles, what have opposite polarity, what keeps the ion ray in the form. And that allows creating the particle accelerator, what can be at the outside of the Oort cloud, and surround the entire solar system. The ion rays would travel in the chain of probably nuclear-powered satellites, which would drive ion rays between them. And in theory, we could make a linear accelerator between Sun and Alpha Centauri by using this technology, but the need for radioactive material and satellites is so large, that this thing would be theory forever. But theories are interesting, and maybe someday we would create massive linear accelerators to space, what length could be thousands of kilometers. They could revolutionize the science, and our way to see how the universe would work.
Since the quarks have been discovered, scientists have been thought, what would form quarks? Then the physicians found the thing, what is called as "super spring". That means that there was something inside quarks, and that thing would be something, that we cannot even think about. But how we can release those particles from inside the quarks? The finding of the Higgs boson has put the scientists in the front of the thing, that every time, when we are looking for new particle, we must create the new particle accelerators for creating the energy level, what is high enough for releasing the new, small and short life particle from the other particles.
The main problem in those tests, what are made in CERN and other acceleration laboratories on our planet, is that if we would create the system, what will shoot new particles out from other particles, we must always operate in the highest limits of the system, and the main problem in those impacts is that the trajectory, what the particle travels in the accelerator tube must not curve very tight, because if the curve is too tight and the energy level is too high, the particle would impact the wall of the accelerator. The thing that makes it possible to make observations of those short-living particles is the extreme speed, and impact energy, which would make time slowing in those particles, which would connect with other particles very shortly after the impact. And that's why the observation of particles like Higgs boson is very difficult.
Higgs boson was only the gate, which proved that many things are waiting for the finder.
But one of the main problems is the size, what the particle accelerators would need if we would want to find new particles, what might be even more revolutionary than the Higgs boson, what proved that there are many particles, what we cannot even imagine. Even if we cannot see the particle itself, we can see the shadow of the particle, and that shadow is seen in the minimum errors between the behavior of real particles and theoretical particles. And one of those errors is minimum changes in the trajectories of particles when they are traveling in the sensor chamber after the electron has been impacting with positron or proton.
That tells that there are more particles, what is more, difficult to find or confirm than Higgs boson ever could be. And Higgs boson is like the gate to those theoretical particles, which can tell us more about the born of the Universe. If we want to find out even the smallest particles in the Universe, we must make larges and larger particle accelerators, for creating the energy levels, which is making it possible to form the new particles or separate them from the quarks.
The need to make larger and larger particle accelerators has brought one hypothetical thought in the mind of scientists and that is, what we can create the extremely large Van Allen belt, we could form two ion rays or flows, what we can collide with extremely high levels of energy, and there is one thing, what puts limit to that machine, and it is that it must be made to the space. If this enormous accelerator would build on the moon to its equator, that the ring-shaped magnets are put in the line, and the particles are traveling between those rings. There is a possibility, that it would make time moving slower in the moon, which would cause some kind of problems.
But if we would use a series of satellites, in theory, nothing puts limits on the size of the particle accelerator. The virtualization of particle accelerators would make it possible to create extremely large concepts in the field of nuclear physics. In this model the physical form of the particle accelerator by using a series of satellites, which can use magnets to accelerate the flow of ions. In some visions, there would be made virtualized particle accelerator, where series of satellites are accelerating ions between them to the trajectory between Venus and Mercury, and those satellites can use solar power, and that would make possible to find new particles, what needs more energy than an accelerator, what created Higgs boson ever could create.
Those ions would consist of particles, what have opposite polarity, what keeps the ion ray in the form. And that allows creating the particle accelerator, what can be at the outside of the Oort cloud, and surround the entire solar system. The ion rays would travel in the chain of probably nuclear-powered satellites, which would drive ion rays between them. And in theory, we could make a linear accelerator between Sun and Alpha Centauri by using this technology, but the need for radioactive material and satellites is so large, that this thing would be theory forever. But theories are interesting, and maybe someday we would create massive linear accelerators to space, what length could be thousands of kilometers. They could revolutionize the science, and our way to see how the universe would work.
Could the "Black Triangle UFO" be the hybrid airship?
Could the "Black Triangle UFO" be the hybrid airship?
The heated air would be used for creating the virtual antigravity effect. The "Black Triangle UFO" might be only the airship-aircraft hybrid, what have the rocket engines in every corner, and the rotor for levitation. In this scenario, the heated air, what is created in the bottles inside the craft would make it lighter. And the propeller in the middle of the and rocket engines would give it extra power for lifting off.
When we are creating something new, we are always forgetting, that the technology, what is needed to create that thing might not be any kind of mythic. One thing, that might not mythic at all might be the so-called "Balck Triangle aircraft". For creating that kind of tool we don't need to break any kind of antigravity, even we are wanted to make that thing silent.
The thing, that is needed is the airflow for the opposite direction to the moving direction. That means that the system can be made very easily and in theory the normal air pump, which would send airflow to every direction.
And there would be the nozzles and ventilation system, which will control the location of the flow of the air. When the pilot wants to turn the direction of the airflow, that means that the ventilates in the certain side of the "triangle" must be open. That allows very well maneuverable for that vehicle, which can turn to every direction in the seconds.
But there is another question, and that is, what would create the necessary air pressure for flying that device at very high speed. The answer could be more conventional than we ever think. That system can base the rocket motor, which would push the fire to the closed chamber, and when the pilot wants to fly the system in a certain direction, the ventilation of the exhaust tubes would open, and that would allow exhausting gas to travel through those tubes. But how that system can levitate without sound.
The thing bases technology, which is called as "zero raise". The idea is that the system uses heated air to rise it above the ground. This version of the system works as an advanced hot air balloon. When the pilot wants to make the craft lighter or levitate, there would be created heated air in the closed chambers.
And when a certain altitude has been reached, the altimeter would follow the altitude, and when the craft is started to sink, the system would start to heat air again, what rises this craft to certain altitude again. And if the "Black Triangle" would hover over some area, the pilot can turn the normal compressors to operate, and that allows the system to move silently. In this scenario, the "Black Triangle" would be an extremely advanced airship-aircraft hybrid, which would have outstanding capacities like a fly to LEO (Low Earth Orbiter).
And the small rockets in each corner would allow it to maneuver very effectively. That kind of system might be created for SAR (Special Air Rescue), what mission is to return the dropped recon planes and satellites, what are accidentally dropped in hostile areas, and what secret data would not allow going in the hands of "enemy".
That system might use holographic and plasma-stealth systems for making it invisible on the radar and making people see other directions. Those holograms are also working in the infrared area, which means that the observer will get confused, even that person uses infrared systems. So that could be the answer to that kind of mysteries. But the thinking is free, and there are many tales about this kind of thing.
Image:
https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article13637011.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/1_SITE-EDIT-UFO-TODAY00_00_50_22Still010.jpg
The heated air would be used for creating the virtual antigravity effect. The "Black Triangle UFO" might be only the airship-aircraft hybrid, what have the rocket engines in every corner, and the rotor for levitation. In this scenario, the heated air, what is created in the bottles inside the craft would make it lighter. And the propeller in the middle of the and rocket engines would give it extra power for lifting off.
When we are creating something new, we are always forgetting, that the technology, what is needed to create that thing might not be any kind of mythic. One thing, that might not mythic at all might be the so-called "Balck Triangle aircraft". For creating that kind of tool we don't need to break any kind of antigravity, even we are wanted to make that thing silent.
The thing, that is needed is the airflow for the opposite direction to the moving direction. That means that the system can be made very easily and in theory the normal air pump, which would send airflow to every direction.
And there would be the nozzles and ventilation system, which will control the location of the flow of the air. When the pilot wants to turn the direction of the airflow, that means that the ventilates in the certain side of the "triangle" must be open. That allows very well maneuverable for that vehicle, which can turn to every direction in the seconds.
But there is another question, and that is, what would create the necessary air pressure for flying that device at very high speed. The answer could be more conventional than we ever think. That system can base the rocket motor, which would push the fire to the closed chamber, and when the pilot wants to fly the system in a certain direction, the ventilation of the exhaust tubes would open, and that would allow exhausting gas to travel through those tubes. But how that system can levitate without sound.
The thing bases technology, which is called as "zero raise". The idea is that the system uses heated air to rise it above the ground. This version of the system works as an advanced hot air balloon. When the pilot wants to make the craft lighter or levitate, there would be created heated air in the closed chambers.
And when a certain altitude has been reached, the altimeter would follow the altitude, and when the craft is started to sink, the system would start to heat air again, what rises this craft to certain altitude again. And if the "Black Triangle" would hover over some area, the pilot can turn the normal compressors to operate, and that allows the system to move silently. In this scenario, the "Black Triangle" would be an extremely advanced airship-aircraft hybrid, which would have outstanding capacities like a fly to LEO (Low Earth Orbiter).
And the small rockets in each corner would allow it to maneuver very effectively. That kind of system might be created for SAR (Special Air Rescue), what mission is to return the dropped recon planes and satellites, what are accidentally dropped in hostile areas, and what secret data would not allow going in the hands of "enemy".
That system might use holographic and plasma-stealth systems for making it invisible on the radar and making people see other directions. Those holograms are also working in the infrared area, which means that the observer will get confused, even that person uses infrared systems. So that could be the answer to that kind of mysteries. But the thinking is free, and there are many tales about this kind of thing.
Image:
https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article13637011.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/1_SITE-EDIT-UFO-TODAY00_00_50_22Still010.jpg
Monday, October 28, 2019
Artificial intelligence and data security.
Artificial intelligence and data security.
The artificial intelligence is the nuclear part of many new types of systems, and that thing would make every product in the world different. If we are thinking about airplanes and other kinds of things like surveillance cameras, artificial intelligence can register things, that normal people cannot realize. It is a good servant but a bad master, but the thing that makes it attractive is that thing is neutral, what is it's the greatest strength. If those systems are ordered to do something, they will do that all the time, and if those systems must detect lies it would do that.
When we are talking about the thing, what is called as fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence can search the databases very fast, and in the work interview situation, it can check automatically the things like graduations from the authorities. But the fact is that this kind of algorithms can also let the unqualified applicants come to interview. The thing is that this system tests, are some interviewers making decisions, what are against the benefit of the company. That means that the system would check, are some interviewers easy to fawn.
Those systems have no feelings, and they see things, what many people don't even want to see. One thing, what artificial intelligence notices, is if some interviewer calls to the applicant but cuts the call right away, and that thing tells, that there is something wrong with those things. Artificial intelligence sees also if the person has sweat or the movements or position on the chair are uncomfortable.
It also notices the level of sound and the melody of the sound, and also it can register, if the applicant tells lies about the funerals or something like that. This means that nobody fawns artificial intelligence. But there is possible that some hackers would change the algorithm, what is doing those things. That's why people, who are responsible for security must use two servers, and the systems would detect, is those algorithms have differences.
That kind of system is basing the RAID-5 backup, which means that the system would store every possible data, what is collected from certain cases would be stored at least in the two servers. The system would compile that data, and if there are differences, it would send information of that to the system operators. The filtered information allows making multi-level scanning in many areas of the data.
One of the most important things is that the system must detect if somebody would try to hide some changes like date or time when the file is saved. That system would have two times, what it uses in the disk bookkeeping. The first is the normal time, and the second one would be "ghost time", which might be a very big number. That virtual time would not have connections in the natural world, and the system would have different "cards", what it uses in certain days when the system is in use.
That system would store, what "card" it has used in each day, and the numbers, what is meaning the numbers, what virtual time uses, might have different lengths. And also they wound not begin from the zero. When the user saves the data, the system stores two types of time, the normal time and the virtual time, and if there is is a difference between those times, what means that the virtual time doesn't match with the normal time, there have been attempts to fix the time.
This kind of things tells, that somebody would have something to hide. Also, the system can keep the backups to every file, what is stored in there, and that thing tells, what kind of data the user removes. In this case, the normal file can be removed, but only the data security officers would allow destroying the backup files.
The artificial intelligence is the nuclear part of many new types of systems, and that thing would make every product in the world different. If we are thinking about airplanes and other kinds of things like surveillance cameras, artificial intelligence can register things, that normal people cannot realize. It is a good servant but a bad master, but the thing that makes it attractive is that thing is neutral, what is it's the greatest strength. If those systems are ordered to do something, they will do that all the time, and if those systems must detect lies it would do that.
When we are talking about the thing, what is called as fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence can search the databases very fast, and in the work interview situation, it can check automatically the things like graduations from the authorities. But the fact is that this kind of algorithms can also let the unqualified applicants come to interview. The thing is that this system tests, are some interviewers making decisions, what are against the benefit of the company. That means that the system would check, are some interviewers easy to fawn.
Those systems have no feelings, and they see things, what many people don't even want to see. One thing, what artificial intelligence notices, is if some interviewer calls to the applicant but cuts the call right away, and that thing tells, that there is something wrong with those things. Artificial intelligence sees also if the person has sweat or the movements or position on the chair are uncomfortable.
It also notices the level of sound and the melody of the sound, and also it can register, if the applicant tells lies about the funerals or something like that. This means that nobody fawns artificial intelligence. But there is possible that some hackers would change the algorithm, what is doing those things. That's why people, who are responsible for security must use two servers, and the systems would detect, is those algorithms have differences.
That kind of system is basing the RAID-5 backup, which means that the system would store every possible data, what is collected from certain cases would be stored at least in the two servers. The system would compile that data, and if there are differences, it would send information of that to the system operators. The filtered information allows making multi-level scanning in many areas of the data.
One of the most important things is that the system must detect if somebody would try to hide some changes like date or time when the file is saved. That system would have two times, what it uses in the disk bookkeeping. The first is the normal time, and the second one would be "ghost time", which might be a very big number. That virtual time would not have connections in the natural world, and the system would have different "cards", what it uses in certain days when the system is in use.
That system would store, what "card" it has used in each day, and the numbers, what is meaning the numbers, what virtual time uses, might have different lengths. And also they wound not begin from the zero. When the user saves the data, the system stores two types of time, the normal time and the virtual time, and if there is is a difference between those times, what means that the virtual time doesn't match with the normal time, there have been attempts to fix the time.
This kind of things tells, that somebody would have something to hide. Also, the system can keep the backups to every file, what is stored in there, and that thing tells, what kind of data the user removes. In this case, the normal file can be removed, but only the data security officers would allow destroying the backup files.
Aristotle and democracy (What means the term "free men"?)
Aristotle and democracy (What means the term "free men"?)
Aristotle said, that the right to give votes must reserve to "free men" because they have the best knowledge about the things, and then about a thousand years after that the voting right expanded to belong also for free women. And that caused a revolution for democracy, but then we have forgotten something, and that is here in the modern time is still many people, who have not right to give votes in any elections.
Those people are handicapped, ward, underage or foreigners, who would not have citizenship, and that's why those people have not right to vote in elections. And that means that the model of Aristotle is still in power. That kind of action, what is limiting the democracy is meant for protecting the state. And this means that they are so-called "necessary evilness", which means that the state must deny the situation, that two million foreigners would come to its territory and votes to the involved in some other country.
But the question is, why youngsters' opinions about the laws are not ever asked? Maybe there is no time for that. But when we are thinking about democracy, and the principle that vote cannot be bought, the answer is a little bit complicated than we ever thought, and the answer would be that there are people, who would buy votes.
Those people would offer more salary, lower taxes and another kind of thing, but there is one problem, the government would need that money, and even the taxes of salaries would be low, the taxes of the food, fuel and another kind of stuff would rise. And this is one thing, what we cannot even think about. If we would want to crush our political opposition, we might call our leaders as the "expert", and that thing would make those people more trusted in the eyes of the great public than world "leader". "
An "Expert" is one of the worlds, which shows real professionalism, and that would be a really good argument in the political discussions. But when we are thinking about "free men", we must realize that in modern times Aristotle would say "free persons" are only capable individuals for making decisions, because they have "right knowledge". But then we should ask, what exactly means "free person"?
Does that mean some businessman or maybe the specialist of administration? Or is it a person, who is a member of the ring, what makes decisions? And who would get the place in this hypothetical ring? Is that the person, who has the right training, and that training could be free to get. But then we must realize, that the high price of those, maybe administrative training would be a good way to eliminate not wanted persons from that training. This is one point of view of those things.
And censorship is a very bad thing in a democracy. If we are thinking election campaigns is not tolerated to deny to print the campaign material of some candidate by using political arguments, rejecting the offer by using argument, that we don't want to print that material we would be childish. If the price of that material would be so high, that person cannot pay it, that will be a very good alternative for political censorship. In this model, political marketing and campaign commercials would be under the heavy tax. And that would make them very expensive.
But if we would give the announcement, that thing would be tax-free, and then the parties, what are under the power would pay a lower price for their commercials because their commercials are interpreted as the announcements. Because opposition cannot pay the prices, their candidates would not get their commercials to the media. And this is the good and non-violent way to make sure, that the same persons would be in the control of the state.
Aristotle said, that the right to give votes must reserve to "free men" because they have the best knowledge about the things, and then about a thousand years after that the voting right expanded to belong also for free women. And that caused a revolution for democracy, but then we have forgotten something, and that is here in the modern time is still many people, who have not right to give votes in any elections.
Those people are handicapped, ward, underage or foreigners, who would not have citizenship, and that's why those people have not right to vote in elections. And that means that the model of Aristotle is still in power. That kind of action, what is limiting the democracy is meant for protecting the state. And this means that they are so-called "necessary evilness", which means that the state must deny the situation, that two million foreigners would come to its territory and votes to the involved in some other country.
But the question is, why youngsters' opinions about the laws are not ever asked? Maybe there is no time for that. But when we are thinking about democracy, and the principle that vote cannot be bought, the answer is a little bit complicated than we ever thought, and the answer would be that there are people, who would buy votes.
Those people would offer more salary, lower taxes and another kind of thing, but there is one problem, the government would need that money, and even the taxes of salaries would be low, the taxes of the food, fuel and another kind of stuff would rise. And this is one thing, what we cannot even think about. If we would want to crush our political opposition, we might call our leaders as the "expert", and that thing would make those people more trusted in the eyes of the great public than world "leader". "
An "Expert" is one of the worlds, which shows real professionalism, and that would be a really good argument in the political discussions. But when we are thinking about "free men", we must realize that in modern times Aristotle would say "free persons" are only capable individuals for making decisions, because they have "right knowledge". But then we should ask, what exactly means "free person"?
Does that mean some businessman or maybe the specialist of administration? Or is it a person, who is a member of the ring, what makes decisions? And who would get the place in this hypothetical ring? Is that the person, who has the right training, and that training could be free to get. But then we must realize, that the high price of those, maybe administrative training would be a good way to eliminate not wanted persons from that training. This is one point of view of those things.
And censorship is a very bad thing in a democracy. If we are thinking election campaigns is not tolerated to deny to print the campaign material of some candidate by using political arguments, rejecting the offer by using argument, that we don't want to print that material we would be childish. If the price of that material would be so high, that person cannot pay it, that will be a very good alternative for political censorship. In this model, political marketing and campaign commercials would be under the heavy tax. And that would make them very expensive.
But if we would give the announcement, that thing would be tax-free, and then the parties, what are under the power would pay a lower price for their commercials because their commercials are interpreted as the announcements. Because opposition cannot pay the prices, their candidates would not get their commercials to the media. And this is the good and non-violent way to make sure, that the same persons would be in the control of the state.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The new way to communicate using light.
"Propagation of light pulses with intermodal dispersion in multimode fibers, MMF. Words are mapped to different frequencies (different ...
-
"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lea...
-
What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it... -
"Visualization of the bridge recombinase mechanism highlighting the donor and target binding loops. Credit: Visual Science" (Scite...
