Skip to main content

Where can we benefit antimatter?

Where can we benefit antimatter?

In theory, the production of antimatter is quite easy. We must just launch the bucket to the orbiter, and then cover the open side by using en layer. After that, we must just turn that thing to the sun, and then the electrons would go through that layer. Then the spin of a couple of electronics would turn opposite. Of course, the same thing can happen to the protons, and that would release more energy. Then the bucket must be equipped with a magnetic field, which denies the antimatter touch with the material.

When we are thinking about the power of antimatter, the energy load of that thing is enormous. Three antielectrons are giving enough energy for boiling a cup of coffee, and that's why the production of those things must happen fully controlled and the number of the positrons, what is the name of an antielectron is very low in each test. So what happens if we would create too many positrons?

The result of that kind of thing is devastating, and that's why the production of positrons is normally done by shooting electrons through the gold layer, and the spin of those electrons turns to the opposite way.  And the thing, what makes that thing possible is that when electron would go through the thick layer it would touch the other electrons, and that touch would turn it to the antielectron.

Mostly used antimaterial particles, which are used in the tests is the positron, what is driven through the particle accelerator against an electron, and that kind of tests have uncovered many particles like Higgs boson. But the problem is that when antimatter touches matter it causes very huge energy releasing, what is called annihilation. So the antimatter bomb is quite an interesting tool in the hands of the military.

The theory of that bomb has been introduced man named Edward Teller, the chief of the United States hydrogen bomb project. And that's why an antimatter bomb is called "Teller's bomb".  But use antimatter as the rocket fuel is a very interesting choice, and the energy of that thing is so high that the gram of antimatter would transport space ship to Alpha Centauri. And the cigarette-size antimatter bomb would destroy the entire continent.

Antimatter can be stored in the very small magnetic bottles and some theories, some weapon researchers have created an idea to make bullets, where would be antielectrons inside them. Making that kind of thing is possible, and I certainly hope that this kind of thing has ever done. Those bullets where is antimatter inside can destroy the entire city, and that thing is really scary to think.

The antimatter engine

The principle of antimatter rocket is similar to a normal rocket. Antimatter would conduct to the combustion chamber and it will react with the material. That would cause a huge explosion, which would push the rocket to the forward. Another way is to make the "Orion-type" spacecraft, where the atom bombs would replace with annihilation engine. That means in the back of the rocket would shoot the bites like nuts. Then those bites would target the antielectrons, which will cause a huge explosion, and then the system would give a very huge punch to that craft. 

It is possible to form antimatter by using cosmic radiation for that process. In the most conventional model, the electrons would shoot through the gold layer, and then the system would transform them into a particle accelerator. The iron bite might be loaded with the opposite polarity of electrons, and that would pull the positrons to that bite. That would allow making the antimatter rocket very easily.

How to produce antimatter by benefitting cosmic radiation?

The production of antimatter can be done by using the funnel, where is the gold layer in it. This system must only shoot to the orbiter of the Earth, where it touches the cosmic radiation.

That gold layer can turn the electrons and even protons to rotate another side, and then those particles would be captured in the magnetic bottle. Separation of antimatter can be done by using a magnet, which pulls the positive and negative particles in different ways. The idea is that the annihilation reaction happens only between the mirror particles.

The safest way would be to target those antielectrons straight to some particle, which denies the possibility of errors and devastating mistakes. This thing can benefit natural cosmic radiation, and it can use in peaceful nuclear engines. 

But if we want to be more effective, we can use active pulling to pull ions and electrons through the gold layer. That system can use positive polarity, which pulls electrons through that layer and pushes protons away. And those antielectrons can be stored in the magnetic bottle, which denies their contact with the wall and other electrons. But the same system can be used to turn also protons to antiprotons, and in that case, the releasing energy layer is extremely high. Then they can put in the extremely small magnetic bottles, and used as the most devastating bullets, what history has ever seen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Plasmonic waves can make new waves in quantum technology.

"LSU researchers have made a significant discovery related to the fundamental properties and behavior of plasmonic waves, which can lead ot the development of more sensitive and robust quantum technologies. Credit: LSU" (ScitechDaily, Plasmonics Breakthrough Unleashes New Era of Quantum Technologies) Plasmonic waves in the quantum gas are the next-generation tools. The plasmonic wave is quite similar to radio waves. Or, rather say it, a combination of acoustic waves and electromagnetic waves. Quantum gas is an atom group. In those atom groups, temperature and pressure are extremely low.  The distance of atoms is long. And when an electromagnetic system can pump energy to those atoms. But the thing in quantum gas is that the atoms also make physical movements like soundwaves. It's possible. To create quantum gas using monoatomic ions like ionized noble gas. In those systems, positive (or negative) atoms push each other away.  When the box is filled with quantum gas and som

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real?

What is the difference between TR-3A and TR-3B? And are those planes real? Is TR-3B (0) "Black Triangle UFO" or is it only the piece of paper?  The study project, what is used to create advanced ideas for use of the nuclear-powered aircraft. Or is it the study project or black budget aircraft, where lost 2,3 trillion dollars (1)of the stealth bomber were gone. In this text is things, that might seem very difficult to accept, and when we are thinking about things like doubling the object or making it smaller by using huge layers of energy, nothing denies to test those things. But were those tests successful, there is no data about that in public Internet, so we must say that things like doubling the human or aircraft can be tested, but the results can be unknown.  But in the source two is the tale, what seems like impossible, those men, who got Noble Prize put at first time one atom to the box, and hit it with photon one photon in the box and hit it with t

The interesting coincidence between USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862)

Image I The interesting coincidence between  USS Sea Shadow (1982) and CSS Virginia (1862) Far away from its time is the thing, that you might notice when you see those two images. The upper one (Image I) is portraying the modern naval USS Sea Shadow (IX-529)(1) experimental Stealth ship, which was created by Lockheed-Martin, and the image below (Image II) is portraying the CSS Virginia (2), the ironclad from the Civil War Era. The thing why the hull of the CSS Virginia, what is ironclad from 1862 is that the ammunition of the cannons would not transfer their impact energy to the hull of the ship. And the reason why Sea Shadows hull has this form is that it should point the radar echo away from the hull.  The thing that I must say that CSS Virginia is far ahead its time because that structure is effective against the explosive ammunition, and the slanting armor of tanks like T-34 and Sherman have made them effective. But for some reason, the use of slanting armor has