Wednesday, January 27, 2021

Writing about speed

   

.

Atlas-sensor of LHC

Writing about speed

Can some object cross the speed of the light? The answer is "yes", but people are not normally thinking about how that thing happens. The easiest way to cross the speed of the light is to make it virtually. That virtual crossing of the speed of light means the researchers just put the proton and electron travel to the opposite directions in the particle accelerator. If the speed of both of those particles is 90% of the lightspeed when they are impacting. The impact speed is 1,8 times the speed of the light. (Speed of proton+speed of the electron). The proton has a positive electric load and the electron has negative electricity, which means that impacting those particles is an easy thing. 

The idea is that the particle that is traveling with the speed is near the speed of light in a vacuum. And then it hits gas or other material where the speed of the light is lower than the speed of the particle in a short moment it would travel with the speed what is higher than the speed of light. The idea in this kind of crossing is that the speed of the light is not stable. 

It depends on the medium, and in the vacuum, the lightspeed is 299792458 m/s. But when the particle hits the glass it's speed is slowing to 200000000 m/s. The Large Hadron collider accelerates electrified (ionized) atoms to the speed of 299 762 478,75 m/s. That is 99,99 percent of the speed of the light(1). If the Large Hadron collider shoots electrons or atoms into the glass with the speed of 99,99 percent of the speed of light to glass that particle will break the glass because during slowing that particle must deliver energy to that particle. 

And because of the slowing of the particle that has mass cannot be limitless during the slowing that particle travels with speed what is higher than the speed of light. The question is can the multi-atomic object stay in one piece during that process? When the particle has mass and it hits the medium, it starts slowing and during the slowing process, the particle must transfer its energy in the medium.

This is calling the "borderline crossing", and things like neutrino detectors are benefitting that thing. When the neutrino is impacting the water in the neutrino detector, it sends the blue-light shock wave during the slowing. 


(1) https://www.livescience.com/63211-lhc-atoms-with-electrons-light-speed.html

https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-how-particle-accelerators-like-the-large-hadron-collider-actually-work

https://www.space.com/15830-light-speed.html

Quantum Tunnels Show How Particles Can Break the Speed of Light:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-tunnel-shows-particles-can-break-the-speed-of-light-20201020/

Image: https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/205043-cern-researchers-tuning-large-hadron-collider-ahead-of-13-tev-collisions

A little bit about the speed of gas

The description for the term "sound" is it's only a wall of the moving gas.  So can the soundwave what is the fast-moving gas travel faster than the sound? The question can turn to model "can molecular gas travel faster than the speed of sound? The answer is "yes"!. The speed of sound is not very high. If we are comparing it to the speed of light. The speed of sound is 343 meters per second. 

And the speed of light is 299 792 458 m/s. So the sound is the movement of molecular gas. When the aircraft travels with supersonic speed people on the ground are hearing the "sonic boom". The sonic boom means that the molecules that the aircraft turns away are traveling by the impact speed between air molecules and the supersonic aircraft. When aircraft hits the air molecule it pushes it like a tennis racket when it hits the ball. The speed of the ball depends on the speed of the tennis racket. 

The speed of gas molecules can cross the speed of sound very easy, and molecules make that almost every day. During explosions, the molecules are traveling outside the explosion with the speed of the firefront. And that means the shockwaves of the nuclear explosions can travel at an extremely high speed. That is multiple of the speed of the sound. 

The speed of ionized gas that comes out from the Sun is many times higher than the speed of sound. The fact is that if we think that the sound is the movement of the molecular gas or ions. That means that the sound can travel at a speed almost the speed of the light. In this case, the "sound" is the term that means the pressure barrier, which travels in the Universe. 



Tuesday, January 26, 2021

Quantum entanglement and its possibilities

   

 

.


F-22 (Wikipedia)

Quantum entanglement and its possibilities

Quantum entanglement and quantum stealth

Atoms or subatomic particles can use as quantum-size rolls or balls, which can kick other particles and electromagnetic radiation in the wanted direction. One of the most fascinating ideas for aviation is to make the quantum layer for the aircraft where the atoms are rotating in the same direction. That can cause that the radio waves are traveling backward. Or the direction where those atoms are pushing them. So the idea of this kind of quantum stealth is the quantum rolls are pushing the electromagnetic radiation in the wanted direction. 

This kind of system where the atoms are rotating in the same direction would make it possible to make the aircraft, where are no visible engines. So if that kind of craft is saucer-shaped it can turn its direction very fast. The needed thing is just to turn those quantum rolls or balls in the wanted direction, and then the ion flow can aim in every possible direction. 

Superpositioning atoms and time dilation

By using atoms as the quantum rolls are possible to make the layer, where those quantum rolls are rotating with the speed of the light. So that kind of thing can cause the time dilation in the craft what is in it. So the quantum technology will make it possible to slow the time in the structure. 

So what if we would cover the entire layer of the aircraft or ship by using the two layers of atoms that are put in the superposition? Then the upper and downed layer of atoms are put to rotate in the opposite directions what makes the quantum entanglement around the object? 

That thing denies the information cannot cross the line or layer of the entangled atoms or ions. The fact is that no information cannot pass the line of the superpositioned atoms or ions. And this thing gives the new type of ideas for stealth technology. This kind of layer can make by using two layers of graphene, where the atoms are rotating in different ways by making it possible to make the lightweight layer, which should deny the electromagnetic radiation to reach the core of the craft. 



Quantum entanglement in data protection

Quantum entanglement is the thing that protects the data inside the quantum tube. The key element of the quantum entanglement in the quantum state the particles are in superposition they are rotating to the opposite side, and that thing denies that the information cannot move from another particle to another. 

This is the idea of quantum cryptography. The information channel is cover with the opposite rotating quantum particles. And that thing causes that the information is not visible from the outside. The quantum channel that protects the information in the quantum computers might be two nanotubes that are one on one. 

The atoms will put to rotate to opposite sides, which should deny that the information cannot pass the nanotube, where it travels in the form of laser or electron ray. Because of the quantum entanglement of opposite rotating atoms of the nanotubes. The data cannot pass the wall of the nanotube. That means that the magnetic fields cannot affect the data transportation particles. And that thing causes that the data would travel in a more stable form. So the quantum entanglement can benefit extremely small electric insulators. 

Image : Wikipedia

Should we stop talking about "multiverse" as a term?

   


.



Should we stop talking about "multiverse" as a term? 

Should we stop talking about "multiverse" as a term? I mean if we think that also there are other universes in the same dimension as us. That means that we can start to call the 3-dimensional universe the "hyper-entirety" or "hyper-universe" that collects the most gigantic entirety together. The dimension continues beyond the edge of the universe. And that means that the edge of the universe is not the limit of the entirety. Or the edge of the universe is not either the limit of 3-Dimensional space where we live. 


Could the new name for the universe the super-hyper group of galaxies?

Should we call our universe rather the "super-hyper" groups of galaxies or galaxy groups? When we are talking about the size of the universe. We should ask what point we use in the description? Do we describe the size of the universe as the edge of the expanding gas? Or should we use the first two photons released in the Big Bang as the limit or distance of edges of the bubble that we call the universe?

But the dimension continues beyond that edge. If there are some other universes, we cannot see them because the shine of galaxies is too bright that we cannot observe the light that comes outside the bubble. 

The origin of multiverse-theory is the idea that the dimension continues beyond the edge of the bubble named "Universe".  The idea in the universe is that it's the bubble that formed in the big bang. And that means that. There is the possibility that somewhere in the distance and our three-dimensional entirety is another bubble or bubbles. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-study-how-our-universe-might-have-bubbled-up-in-the-multiverse-20210125/

Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

There are three theories of the other universes: Multiverse, Parallel universe, and Déja-Vu (Phoenix-theory) universe.

The difference between Multiverse and Pareller universe theories:

1) Multiverse theory: Universes are in the same dimension where we are living

In the Multiverse-theory: Other universes are existing in the same three-dimensional space. The interaction between those universes is conventional. But that interaction is so weak. That's why we cannot observe that interaction. 

The internal gravitational interaction between particles in our universe covers the gravity effect of other hypothetical universes that are locating outside that certain universe. The reason for that is that internal gravity sources from the universe cover the effect of gravity. If that comes outside of the entirety. 

2) Parallel-universe theory: Other universes are existing but they are not in the same dimension as us. 

In Parallel-universe theory: Other universes are existing in different dimensions, which means they can interact only by the most highly-energetic reactions. The high-energetic reaction causes that the energy will transmit through the wall between the dimensions. 

The same way as if the person would jump in the flat hard enough. The observer cannot see the jump itself. But that jump can hear downstairs. So if there is some kind of other universes in other dimensions, the high energetic reaction causes that energy can be tunneling through the border of dimensions if the energy load is high enough. 

3) Déja-Vu or Phoenix-universe requires that the universe is closed

The Déja-Vu- or Phoenix-Theory goes like this: The universe is like Phoenix-bird. It will be born in the "Big Bang" starts to expand until gravity wins. Then the expansion of the universe ends, and the entirety is ending its existence in "Big Crash". 

All of the material is turning into a black hole. That black hole will someday explode as the new Big Bang. And that new Big Bang forms the new universe. So the universe is existing between the Big Bangs and Big Crash and that continuum of the endless chain continues forever. But that series that continues forever requires that the entire material will drop back to the black hole that will someday explode and starts the new universe. 

But if some material would travel out from the gravitational range of the black hole forms in the Big Crash. That means that the continuum is losing the material. And sooner or later that phoenix universe would turn to open. Then the entirety will turn to the wave movement that continues its expanding forever. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

.

Image II: The timeline of the Universe

If there are other universes in our three-dimensional space. Those other hypothetical universes could be very different from what our universe is. 

If there are other universes in somewhere. That doesn't mean that there are also stars and planets in all of those bubbles. The entire universe can form by black holes or gas or even dark matter. Or the other universes can be formed by antimaterial There is an endless number of hypotheses about the form of those other hypothetical universes. 

So the multiverse theory goes that there are many bubbles in the same three-dimensional space and those other bubbles are also the universes. The thing how we could try to find the other universes is simple. We have to calculate the simulated movements of the gas of the cosmic web. 

And then try to compare the real movements of the entirety of the gas to the model that is calculated by some supercomputer. If the theoretical models are different than the real movement, that can tell the interaction between the giant gas formations and some distant object. 

The thing is that how we are calling the three-dimensional space, where we are living? Should we call that space, what continues beyond the edge of our bubble as space, or should we turn to describe our bubble as the hyper- or super-hyper group of galaxies? 

There is one galaxy, were seems not to have a supermassive black hole in it. The reason for that could be that the jet from the galaxy is pulling in some other black hole. And that thing means that the material and radiation are simply vanishing in the black hole. 

When we are observing the form of galaxies. We are seeing the disk of ice and gas that is dropping in the supermassive black hole, which is found in the nucleus of the galaxies. There is only one galaxy. Where is not seem the supermassive black hole in the center of it, and where that black hole is gone is a mystery. 

The material disk is only a small part of the galaxy, and there are many stars outside that material disk. The reason why supermassive black holes are the necessary thing for forming the material disks of galaxies is that they are offering the material center for the gas and other stuff. 

So the galaxies are forming the local galaxy group. The local galaxy groups are forming the supergroups of galaxies. And the supergroups of galaxies are forming the "cosmic network" or "cosmic neural structure". What is forming the universe? 

Can there be a continuum in the expanding of the size of objects? Can the universe interact with other universes through three-dimensional space? So if there are other universes or bubbles in our dimension, there is the possibility that those bubbles are forming even larger networks that "cosmic neural structure" ever can be". 

https://scitechdaily.com/deepening-astronomical-mystery-on-the-hunt-for-a-missing-giant-black-hole/

Image II: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

Probably the BLC-1 signal is from Proxima Centauri, probably not.

   


Probably the BLC-1 signal is from Proxima Centauri, probably not.

Some people believe that the BLC-1 (Breakthrough Listen Candidate 1) signal is not coming from Proxima Centauri(1). And the reason for that is that its origin uses synthetic radiofrequency. The thing is that can tell something about the signal itself. And that means the signal was not mean for us. So it is not probably an attempt to make contact with the human race. And that means that the BLC-1 radio signal is interesting anyway.

In some wildest visions, it's the alien civilization's internal communication. But we know that there is probably no civilizations on the planet of Proxima Centauri. So one of the most interesting possibilities is that the signal is coming from some interstellar probe. But that kind of thing is only speculations.

*******************************************************************************************


Extraterrestrial signals might not mean the attempt to make contact with us or any other civilizations.

Even if BLC-1 is coming from Proxima Centauri. The use of synthetic frequency might mean that it's for the internal messaging of the senders. So the extraterrestrial message is not mean that it's an attempt to contact us.

It might mean for control- or aiming signal for interstellar probes. In some visions, extraterrestrial civilizations can send two types of signals what are using different frequencies.

1) Use of the Hydrogen emission frequency use to attempt to make contact with other civilizations.

2) Synthetic radio frequencies are for civilization's internal messages.

Use of those synthetic frequencies could be reserved for sending orders for space probes and another message together. The synthetic frequency protects the data from disturbing and that's why we are using synthetic frequencies for communication.

*******************************************************************************************


The idea when people are talking about the signal what comes from the direction of Proxima Centauri or some other star is that we are talking about a thing, what might come from another star. The thing is that if the signal is using synthetic radiofrequency makes that signal interesting. The use of synthetic frequency means the high possibility that a sender is an artificial machine. And another thing is interesting.

.

Image II: https://www.damninteresting.com/the-daedalus-starship/

About the possibility of that BLC-1 signal send by the interstellar probe.

Could the sender of the message the interstellar probe? There is a tale that the thing that was capture in the Roswell incident was an unmanned probe. But there are so many tales about that case that nobody knows what is true and what is fake.

When we are thinking about the possibility that an interstellar probe that thing causes fascinating thoughts. Humans are making the models of the interstellar spacecraft(2). And even if they would be robot spacecraft that are using artificial intelligence to control their operations. Those futuristic spacecraft are the enormous systems that mankind ever imagined. Even unmanned versions of the interstellar spacecraft models would have a length of kilometers, but before we make them we need some promising star where to send those spacecraft.

So in some models, the interstellar probes have sub-probes, which they can send to solar systems when they are traveling near them. That means that there is a possibility that an interstellar probe can be in our solar system. So what kind of possibilities that kind of probe could give us, if we are finding this kind of spacecraft on our planet.

So when we are searching the extraterrestrial civilizations we might not find them very close. There is one sun-type star in 1800 light-years away from Earth(3). That means that this civilization if it exists might not visit here very soon. Sending the message to that star takes 1800 years, and their answer will take 1800 years. So that means that the communication between that civilization and us would take 3600 years. And that is a very long time.

(1)https://astronomy.com/news/2021/01/why-the-recent-signal-that-appeared-to-come-from-proxima-centauri-almost-certainly-didnt

(2)https://www.damninteresting.com/the-daedalus-starship/

(3) https://earthsky.org/space/source-of-wow-signal-in-1977-sunlike-star-2mass-19281982-2640123

Image I: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLC1.


Image II: https://www.damninteresting.com/the-daedalus-starship/

http://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2021/01/26/probably-the-blc-1-signal-is-from-proxima-centauri-probably-not/

Monday, January 25, 2021

The signal from the direction of Proxima Centauri remains a mystery.

  

.

Parkes radio telescope at Australia, what detected BLC-1 signal in December 2020(Image I)

The signal from the direction of Proxima Centauri remains a mystery.

The signal from the direction of Proxima Centauri has been in the news. The BLC-1 (Breakthrough Listen Candidate 1) signal is not happening again(1). And that means there is not knowing where that signal came from. The BLC-1 signal is a mystery, and if there are no other signals, the only way to find out is coming from some man-made satellite or is it coming from the Proxima Centauri is trying to break the possible code of that message. And there is always the possibility that there is no code in that message, what came and then turned silent. The only way to get information about this signal is to analyze itself. 

So the thing that everybody is hoping is that it's not the alien signal. But there is always the possibility that the probe, sent by another civilization has sent that message. Or that thing can be the targeting signal what helps somebody to aim the antenna in the right place. The only thing that shares the information of that signal is scientific magazines. 

BLC-1 is a very fascinating signal. And maybe it is the first of signals along with Wow!-signal(2) that will analyze by using quantum computers. There is the possibility that the most powerful computers in the world are finding the algorithms from those signals. And there is the possibility that those algorithms can break by using the most modern calculators the quantum computers. 

But there is the possibility that the mystery of those two signals remains forever. That means that the code-breakers would not find any kind of codes or reasonable sequences from both messages or radio signals. That means that the origin of those signals can remain a mystery. 

The Big Ear telescope, what detects the Wow! signal August 15, 1977 (Image II)

The origin of the Wow!-signal has been calculated by determining the origin of that signal both Big Ear-telescopes antennas and that eliminated the error in a computer program, which denied that the system didn't store data which of antennas captured that signal. So the calculation brought two points where that signal could come. 

The interesting thing about the Wow!-signal's origin is that the other of those points are in the same direction as one yellow star. That star is similar to the Sun. But it's 1800 light-years away from us. (3)

And that thing can be a coincidence. But it is the fascinating detail in the alien-hunting. The fact is that the origin of the Wow!-signal might ever solve statistically. And the same fate might face the BLC-1. Unless the supercomputers are not finding secret codes from those messages. 

https://www.space.com/proxima-centauri-signal-breakthrough-listen-pete-worden-interview

(1)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLC1

(2)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal

(3)https://earthsky.org/space/source-of-wow-signal-in-1977-sunlike-star-2mass-19281982-2640123

Image I: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLC1

Image II: http://www.bigear.org/

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2021/01/25/the-signal-from-the-direction-of-proxima-centauri-remains-a-mystery/

The quantum materials are giving a new form of invisible technology.

.

 

The quantum materials are giving a new form of invisible technology.

Nanotube-based engines are not breaḱ the stealth form.

Nanotubes can make it possible to make the new type of ion WARP-type engines and stealth structures. Those WARP-engines what are the ion engines. That is pulling ionized gas through them is not capable of interplanetary flight. But they can revolutionize aviation.

The new anti-radar stealth systems can benefit the radiation of the radar and conduct it to batteries. That thing can make it possible to suck the entire radiofrequency radiation to the aircraft or ship and that denies the radar echo from the target.

The nanotubes can also use as ion engines. The system operates like a normal ion- or electric jet engine. But the size of those nanotubes is much smaller than the electric turbojet, ramjet, or scramjet engines. The gas is ionized at the front of the nanotubes, and conduct through them.

The particle accelerator is connected to those nanotubes, and they can be used as ion engines or electrodynamic (WARP) engines. The nanotubes are not breaking the form of the aircraft, and that means that use of them is possible to make a more effective engine system for stealth aircraft. There is the possibility that those ion tracks can use as the weapon.

The target that comes from backward can point to the radio ray, which has the opposite polarity to ion flow. And that thing can destroy the other aircraft because the opposite electric load will pull the ions to that target.

Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_F-117_Nighthawk

The visual quantum stealth

The active quantum stealth is easy to explain. The system will just aim the photons in a different direction than the observer is standing. Quantum size ice-cream scoop can be the next generation stealth system. Those extremely small scoops are connecting to the quantum axel, and then they can throw photons away from the direction of the observer but making that kind of structure is very hard to make. But if that system is possible someday, that turns the layer into the shadow.

Things like photon traps that are trapping photons a transfer them to the extremely small tubes where they are traveling in certain directions inside the material can be the key for the next generation stealth system. The active quantum stealth could base the technology, where the quantum version of watermills will kick the photons to the photon trap, and because there is no echo in that kind of material the system will make the thing look like a shadow.

So as you might see these kinds of things are the theoretical materials, what can make the aircraft or ship look like some kind of shadow. Theoretically making this kind of system is not more difficult than making the rotor that is kicking photons and electrons to the tubes, which is making them travel in the direction away from the observer. But a practical solution requires a little bit more work than just making some kind of quantum version of an ice cream scoop. Or rather saying the quantum size ice-cream scoop is the key element in that kind of system.

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2021/01/25/the-quantum-materials-are-giving-a-new-form-of-invisible-technology/

How can the quantum system be in chaos and order at the same time?

  


.


How can the quantum system be in chaos and order at the same time?


A Frankenstein of Order can help to create a new type of quantum processor that is smaller and operates at higher temperatures than the present quantum microprocessors. The chaotic energy field can protect the data transportation layer. 

The image above portrays the Frankenstein of Order. The blue areas could be the energy fields and the lines could be the routes of particles. And as you see the quantum system is in order and disorder at the same time. This Frankenstein of Order can use in the next-generation quantum computers in data transportation. 

If the magnetic field is protecting the data transportation layer by isolating it from other radiation. That thing can make a new era for quantum processors. The particles can be protected by using the laser-rays and the data transportation particles can travel inside the laser rays, which protects them against the outcoming electromagnetic radiation. 

The quantum system is in chaos and order at the same time very simple way. The electromagnetic fields between the particles are maintaining a chaotic state. And the particles that are moving between the nucleus of the quantum network are in order. So because chaos surrounds order, we can say that the chaos is feeding order. 

When the particles are traveling in the electromagnetic fields what can be very turbulent. That electromagnetic field transfers the energy to those particles. Because the chaotic field is surrendering the order-layer, that means that the information is very hard to observe if the observer would stand outside the system. 

The turbulent electromagnetic field is isolating the particles that are traveling in the electromagnetic field. And that makes it impossible to read data from those particles outside the turbulent electromagnetic field. 

The energy travels always to the particle or the less-energetic point. And if the energy load in the turbulent electromagnetic field is more energetic than the particle that travels inside it. That thing makes it hard to detect the particle, because the electromagnetic field is more powerful, and the electricity travels to the particle.

When we are thinking about white light, that light or the form of photons is in disorder. And laser light is coherent, which means it has only one frequency or wavelength. 

So laser-ray is the photon row, what is in order. The idea of the combination the order and disorder in the photonic data transmission is simple. The laser light that transports the data is traveling inside white light. When the laser ray is traveling inside the powerful white light. The laser ray can detect if it is pointing to the sensor. But otherwise, it's hard to notice. When a coherent energy ray travels in the white light, it should keep its form, and the frequency (wavelength) of the radiation in white light what is the same as the coherent light will pump the energy to the laser ray. 

So if the frequency what the laser uses is removed from the white light. That means that the laser ray doesn't be disturbed. But let's go back to the quantum system what is in order and disorder at the same time and how that system can benefit the data transport. One version is to send the particles, what should transmit data inside the laser or maser radiation, what mission is to deny the interaction between the particle and magnetic field. 

https://scitechdaily.com/a-frankenstein-of-order-and-chaos-researchers-discover-a-hybrid-quantum-system/

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/a-frankenstein-of-order-and-chaos-researchers-discover-a-hybrid-quantum-system/


Six clicks separate people from each other.

“A long-observed social phenomenon suggests that people across the globe are separated by surprisingly few connections. Credit: Stock” (Scit...