The use of neutral atoms in the quantum computer would be one of the most interesting ideas in the history of quantum technology and especially quantum computers.

The use of neutral atoms in the quantum computer would be one of the most interesting ideas in the history of quantum technology and especially quantum computers. 

--------------------------------------------

Image I

"THIS ILLUSTRATION REPRESENTS TWO ENTANGLED QUBITS, IN WHICH THE QUBITS ARE INDIVIDUALLY CONTROLLED STRONTIUM ATOMS. THE RED SHAPES DENOTE SO-CALLED OPTICAL TWEEZERS THAT HOLD ONE ATOM EACH. EACH STRONTIUM ATOM HAS TWO OUTER ELECTRONS, CHARACTERISTIC OF ALKALINE-EARTH ATOMS. ONE ELECTRON BELONGING TO THE ATOM PICTURED AT LEFT IS IN A LARGE ORBITAL, REFERRED TO AS A RYDBERG STATE. WHEN THESE TWO ATOMS ARE ENTANGLED, EITHER ATOM COULD OCCUPY THE RYDBERG STATE; THEY ARE IN WHAT QUANTUM PHYSICISTS CALL A SUPERPOSITION OF BOTH POSSIBILITIES. CREDIT: CALTECH" (https://scitechdaily.com/caltech-innovations-using-alkaline-earth-atoms-pave-the-way-for-new-quantum-computer-designs/)

----------------------------------------

The use of atoms in quantum computers is one way to create qubit. The thing is that making the atom rotate there is the possibility to create the photon source, which can send photons by very high accuracy. In the tests, the strontium-atoms are in the superposition with each other. That means that their electrons or sharper saying two outer electrons would orbit the nucleus of the atoms with the same period. 

In the image above is introduced the idea of this thing, and it bases in the Rydberg position. The atom in the left has one electron in the larger orbit, which is synchronized with the most out electron of the right atom. When those electrons are in one line they can transmit the data between them. 

Source:

https://scitechdaily.com/caltech-innovations-using-alkaline-earth-atoms-pave-the-way-for-new-quantum-computer-designs/

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/caltech-innovations-using-alkaline-earth-atoms-pave-the-way-for-new-quantum-computer-designs/

Use of neutrons as the qubit bases the same idea. 

The thing is that the neutron can form the neuron star if they are stressed with electromagnetic radiation. That radiation would make neutrons rotate very fast, and they would send the radiation like large scale neutron stars. When the stress of the electromagnetic radiation will decrease the rotation of the neutron will also decrease, and the level of radiation will decrease. So if the rotation speed of the neutrons will be adjusted with very high accuracy that thing would make it possible to use the neutrons as the photon source in quantum computers. 

But there is one more fascinating idea for creating qubits, and that thing is making neutron acting like a miniature neutron star. If researchers would create the neutron what is hovering in the magnetic field, that thing would make it possible to make them rotate like neutron stars, and in that case, the poles of the neutron would send the radiation. And that radiation would be detected by using the photon detectors. 

The new paradox that Casts Doubt on a Pillar of Reality

    

"Even clouds are thinking"

The new paradox that Casts Doubt on a Pillar of Reality

So if something happens, if we cannot see it, does that make the thing nonexistent? Or is the thing, what has not happened before thing, what would ever happen? Or if somebody tells us about that thing, and we all hear that story, do we all understand that thing in the same way? 

The thing in this paradox is does something happen if we cannot see the case itself? Or does the special case happen that way, what the most of the cases like that one happen? Let's take an example of a tree, which falls in the forest. Does this particular tree fall because of wind what has an unusually powerful whirl? Or does somebody fall the tree in purpose? 

Of course, most of the trees are falling because of natural reasons, but does this only one particular tree fall because of wind. There is a possibility that the GRB (Gamma-Ray Burst) can also fall the tree or the small black hole can cause the effect, where the tree is fallen, but in most cases, the reason is the wind some kind of landslide. And there is no reported case that the GRBs or black holes are fallen any trees, but the first time would be the first case when this thing happens. But this is only the philosophical text. 

When the tree falls in the forest, and nobody sees that thing does it keep sound? The answer is that maybe it keeps, but there is a possibility that the layer, where it falls is so soft that it would not keep loud sound. 

The thing is that we know that the falling tree is keeping sound, but we don't observe it. This is one of the greatest paradoxes in history. And another form of that paradox is that when we are in the forest and find the fallen tree we know that tree has been fallen. Or does somebody put it in there? The thing is that somebody might put that thing on there, by using some kind of airship, etc. 

But the thing is that we have the right to believe that the tree is fallen for natural reasons like wind, what might fall that tree. But the question is about the thing, what we cannot observe. The thing that happens all the time, but we ever see that thing, because that thing happens too far. Or the effect of the case is otherwise too weak to observe nonexistent. This is a great thing to think about for the day. 

Article about this topic: https://www.sciencealert.com/a-new-quantum-paradox-throws-the-foundations-of-observed-reality-into-question

--------------

Enrico Fermi and chocolate cake

Can we expect that somebody knows everything?

The thing is that we all have different backgrounds, so we all understand things from a different angle. Let's take one example: If we meet Enrico Fermi, one of the most brilliant minds in nuclear physics, the man who created the first nuclear reactor and wrote so-called Fermi's paradox, we might ask that person about nuclear reactors and other kinds of things. 

And Fermi probably tells us many things about those things. So Fermi is a really wise and intelligent man, but then we can ask Fermi "what is the chocolate cake in Chinese?". If Fermi doesn't know that word, would that thing make him stupid? The thing is that Fermi probably asks us to take the Chinese dictionary and look at that thing ourselves. But the fact is that this kind of thing is so-called acting divalike. 

So does the thing that Fermi doesn't know or remember the word chocolate cake in Chinese thing, what we can run to tell the bartender in a local pub? Of course, we can run to that pub and say that Enrico Fermi, the great nuclear scientist didn't know, what is the chocolate cake in Chinse, and probably Fermi sees that thing in the newspaper of the morning. That news tells that Enrico Fermi doesn't know the word chocolate cake in Chinese. But honestly, we cannot expect that even the most brilliant minds in history order chocolate cake in Chinese every day. 

Biography of Enrico Fermi: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi

--------------------------------

"Teller's bomb" or antimatter weapon the most horrific explosive in history

"Teller's bomb" or antimatter weapon the most horrific explosive in history

Have you ever hear the term "vintage archeology"? That term means researching the new technology undercover as archeologic or mythic research. In those cases, the research is covered as some kind of archeological or pseudoscientific project. And one of those things might be the thing, what is called Teller's bomb. Teller's bomb is simply the antimatter weapon and the thing, that makes it so terrifying is that the gram of antimatter can destroy the entire planet. 

The model of the antimatter bomb is one of the most interesting and at the same time the most terrifying thing in history. Somebody is claiming that in the movie "Raiders of the lost arc" in the seizure, where Indiana Jones is taking the stick, what shows the position of the Lost Arc is hidden in the model of antimatter bomb. The thing is that antimatter or  "improved cathode weapon" is one of the most powerful weapons in history. 

The idea of an antimatter bomb was officially introduced by Dr. Edward Teller who worked as technical manager of the U.S hydrogen bomb program. The idea of the antimatter bomb is simple. The high voltage electricity would be loaded to the capacitor, which is in the case of the movie the crystal. Then the electrons or cathode ray would be conducted to the tube, where is a layer of leaf gold. 

That leaf gold would turn the spin of the electrons in the opposite direction. The system needs "only" the layer, which pulls the electrons to it, and then the system can create positrons. I don't know did some ancient civilization knew antimatter bomb, but in fact, this kind of weapon would be easy to load by using lightning, or natural electricity. The thing is that this kind of thing is the biggest mysteries in history, and we must realize that many things are hidden from ordinary people. 

Are Yeti and Bigfoot the result of some genetic experiments? Or are they the result of some kind of remote-control tool?

 Are Yeti and Bigfoot the result of some genetic experiments? Or are they the result of some kind of remote-control tool?

Film part I

Are genetic engineering and the uplifting animals the thing, what some people don't want you to know about Yeti and Bigfoot? The thing is that during history scientists have tried to create the "gate" species, what would tell people, what animals talking about. There are tests, what are made by Dr. Ivanov, where the head of the animal transfer to another animal. 

The thing is that the genetic tests, which are made by using monkeys are somehow unable to reach, and the thing is that those tests are not very humorous, but for some reason, the data of those tests are not easy to find. Another explanation for those mysterious creatures is that they are equipped with some kind of remote-control system, where the iron net would stimulate the brain core of those apes, who are implanted by the remote control system. 

Film part II

But the thing is that there is a possibility that somebody is tried to make the intelligent version of the normal cat or dog. Theoretically, that thing would be done by transferring the genomes, which is controlling the advantage of human brains to the dog. And then the brains of those animals would be far advanced than other similar species. In some ideas, the master of the puppy could transfer their mind to those animals in cover, and then those futuristic scientists would clone their bodies. Then the mind or electric operations of those people's brains would transfer back to their bodies. 

This thing is one of the most futuristic ideas in the world. But when we are thinking about the possibility that somebody would make the dog or cat, what has the same IQ what humans have, would cause very much resistance. The reason for that would be that the human race would get another intelligent company on the Earth, and that thing would be similar when an alien takes the contact. 

The thing that we are suddenly sharing our planet, where we have been unique intelligent species, would get the company. Another intelligent species would be very interesting but in the same way a frightening idea. And this is the reason why genetic experiments with another animal species, especially if they are tests of intelligence would be very hard to accept. So this is the thing, why it is so difficult to prove. Another question is that does somebody want to hide some parts of that kind of experiment. 

Ilya Ivanovich Ivanov: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilya_Ivanovich_Ivanov

Another state of condensate "Rydberg polaron".

  Another state of condensate "Rydberg polaron".

Image I

"Schematic showing a Rydberg polaron. Strontium atoms (in yellow) fit inside the orbit between the nucleus (in red) and the electron (in blue) of a Rydberg atom" (Wikipedia, Rydberg polaron).

Rydberg polaron is one state of ions and in that case, one heavier atom would collect lighter atoms orbiting it. That thing creates the super atom, where the lighter atoms are acting like electrons around one giant atom. Or the heaviest atom would act as the nucleus of a super-atom. And that super atom can be formed also in the low temperatures like Bose-Einstein condensate, but the thing is that Rydberg polaron would be formed in theory also at room temperature. 

Image II

"Quantum tunneling through a barrier. The energy of the tunneled particle is the same but the probability amplitude is decreased". (Wikipedia, Quantum tunneling)

The Rydberg polaron can theoretically be formed by using the electromagnetic ray, which would be targeted to the heavy stable atom, and the increasing power of the electromagnetic field could capture the lighter atoms, what means that the Rydberg polaron could be possible in the room temperature, but the thing is that the increasing the energy level of the heavy particles like Krypton atom, and that would pull the things like hydrogen atoms to orbit it. In theory, this kind of artificial superatoms can form the normal-looking ionic bonds and material layers. So what makes this kind of extremely large atoms interesting. 

Image III

A simulation of a wave packet incident on a potential barrier. In relative units, the barrier energy is 20, greater than the mean wave packet energy of 14. A portion of the wave packet passes through the barrier. (Wikipedia, Quantum barrier)

Quantum tunneling 

Quantum tunneling means that when the wavepacket hits the potential barrier, it would echo back, but on the other side of the potential barrier would the "ghost" packet continue its journey. The idea of quantum tunneling is the same when somebody would hit the physical wall. 

When the thing would hit the wall, the people would hear that thing on the other side of it. The same way another wave movement would act when it would hit the potential wall. 

When the wave packet would hit the potential wall, it would transmit it's energy to the wall, and then the energy would be transmitted to the other side of the wall. The same way the hitting the wall makes that the energy of the impact will travel through the wall, and then it would turn to the sound wave. 

Image IV

"An electron wavepacket is directed at a potential barrier. Note the dim spot on the right that represents tunneling electrons". (Wikipedia, Quantum tunneling)

Physical tunneling is a little bit different thing than quantum tunneling.

In the same ways as Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) the Rydberg polaron can have the ability called "tunneling". Term tunneling means that those atoms can travel through walls, and that means that if we would create a machine, what is formed by Bose-Einstein condensate or Rydberg polaron that machine can travel through the walls. The reason for that effect is that the atoms in those states are extremely large, and when the material hits the wall, the atoms would turn smaller. 

Bose-Einstein condensate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_condensate

Quantum tunneling: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling

Rydberg atoms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rydberg_atom

Rydberg polaron: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rydberg_polaron

Image I: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rydberg_polaron

Image II: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling

Image III: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling

Image IV:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling

The quantum switch plays billiard by using single photons.

The quantum switch plays billiard by using single photons.

The ability to take a photograph of one single photon would make it possible to make the quantum switch, which would just play the billiard with the single electrons. The system would be a quantum version of the switch, which is used in microelectronics. The ability to move the direction of the single photons would make the new abilities for quantum computers. That switch would send the data to the wanted direction by using extremely high accuracy. 

When we are thinking about the problems with the photon microchips where the data would travel in the form of photons, that thing would make this kind of system more effective than anything before. The ability to use photons in the data transporter in the microchips would give them the ability to operate at an extremely low temperature without warming and that ability is important in the quantum computer. 

The form of the quantum computer would be the series of regular microchips, where the data is loaded by cutting the bit row. And then the system would wait a certain time until it would release the data to the linear form. If those microchips would operate by photons that thing would make it possible to keep the temperature lower than if the system uses electrons. And photons are immune for electromagnetic fields what gives those systems higher accuracy than by using photons. 

Can we someday move stars? (Part II)

 Can we someday move stars? (Part II)

A simple scheme of the fusion engine

When we are looking at the image, of the system that can move stars, that thing is similar to the normal fusion motor. But the scale would be larger. The fusion engine would create the artificial star inside it, and then the magnets would pull the alpha-particles backward. The thing about super technology is that the scale of it would be different than the regular technology. And here I must say, that researchers have not made a single functional fusion engine yet, so that engine is in the theoretical level. 

The thing is that this magnet track, what accelerates particles can virtualize by using nanotechnology. The large group of nanomachines would create a long accelerator track, which can accelerate the particles very high speed. Those nanomachines can be connected to the spacecraft by using extremely powerful magnets, what are pulling those things behind the spacecraft. That thing would give more capacity for interstellar ramjet. 

The size of the system that is needed for moving the star would be larger. The nozzle can be virtualized by using a large group of satellites that can aim the ion thrust in a certain direction. The link to the first part of this text is found below in this text. 

https://controllingsociety.blogspot.com/2020/08/can-we-someday-move-stars-part-ii.html