Archeologists have said that there is no evidence that the entire Holy Bible would be true.

Archeologists have said that there is no evidence that the entire Holy Bible would be true. 

This thing might be a very interesting point of view because the thing, what archeologists can say, that about year zero in Isreal lived rabbi named Jesus, and the thing is that we cannot say, how common the name "Jesus" was. And that's why there is one thing, what makes that name very interesting. The names that ended to the "S"-letter were very usual in the Roman empire, and the patricians, the high-ranking noblemen of Rome used the letter "S" as the last letter of the name.

So is it possible that the young Rabbi, what was mentioned in the archives was Roman citizen, and the thing, Pilatus convicted him to death might be caused because Jesus was Roman? Or he believed that Jesus was Roman, and that caused the reason, why he was made the solution, what served the benefit of the Jews.

But the thing is that there must be some kind of reasons, why Pilatus ordered the innocent man to death. And the mystery of the reason, why the punishment was so rough remains. The thing, that Judas told to priests is hiding in the secrecy. What was the thing, what caused that conviction? Was there something, what was hidden from the public eye? The second thing is who was Judas? The name means "Judean", and that can mean that the identity of that person was hidden.

Sometimes some researchers have introduced the theory, that Jesus was a body double. A Roman agent provocateur, whose mission was to provocate riots, and then that would justify Romans to take control of entire Judea. But there is no evidence about that thing. The identity of Jesus has been looking for by tracking the documents of the trial, where two bandits were convicted at the same time.

The name of his family was not "Nasarethian", and the family name is really important when we are trying to track the roots of that man. And maybe the family name would also uncover the place, where he was buried.

Was Jesus introduced to the audience as the leader of the bandits, who were in court on that day?

There is possible that in this time there were many priests or holy men, who used the name "Jesus". But the thing is hidden in history. When we are looking for the evidence of the things, what happened in Judea about 2000 years ago, and try to find the answer, what caused the series of happenings, what was created our religion, we have the small possibility that there is found some archives, what are covered in the secrecy.

And there is a possibility, that those archives are in storage, which keeps them in good condition. But proving those things authentic is difficult. The papers could be written a couple of years after the death of that man, and there is a possibility, that The Holy Bible is handling this mysterious case that there could be many men named Jesus, and the empty grave is telling that something that the Romans might empty that grave for finding out, who was that person, who made something, what they didn't understand.

When we are thinking about the crucifixion, that thing can also be faked. So what if the Romans thought that man could be useful if he turns their side. They might provocate the riot, for causing the hate in the mind of Jesus, and then they hoped that the thing, that Jews wanted his death would turn their prisoner's mind for giving information for interrogation officers easier.

The thing that is a mystery is that were those yells and demands for the crucifixion targeted to Jesus himself or were they targeted tho those two bandits, who have crucified both sides of him? One reason, why Jesus ended his life at the cross, and people wanted that the bandit was released, was that somebody would tell people, that Jesus was one leader of those bandits gang. And the misunderstanding caused that the Pilatus gave orders for crucifixion.