The new type of gravitational waves might detect by using the new sensor.

 

The gravitational waves are proven that the gravitation is wave movement like all other three fundamental interactions are. There is the possibility that the wave-particle duality is also working with this force. And if researchers can prove that thing. That proves the existence of graviton.  But the problem is that gravitational waves are so weak effect. That even detect them is hard. The observable gravitation waves are born only in the highest energetic reactions in the universe. 

The weakness of gravitational waves means that the gravitons that are the hypothetical transportation particles of the gravitation are also very small or unique-sized particles. 

Or are the gravitons the form of the primordial black holes? Which means they would be the energy centers without a particular form.  

Are those missing gravitons the particles that formed just after the Big Bang? 

Otherwise saying, those small transportation particles of the gravitation could be the particles. That formed just after the Big Bang. Straight from the radiation or wave movement. So are those almost proven gravitons the first particles that formed in the universe? 

If gravitons size is small enough that means no antenna can resonate with gravitons. And if graviton is a very low energetic particle it cannot interact along with other particles. If the mass or energy of the impacting particle that impacts with graviton is too high, that covers the impact. 

The speed and mass and energy level of the particle must be just right. That the graviton interaction can be detected. The thing is that the particle that moves with the right speed and has the right energy level can collect enough gravitons that it can affect its trajectory. The idea is that the graviton cloud near the moving particle can change its trajectory. Before they are hitting it. 

So is the anomaly of the Muon g-2 experiment the reason for the graviton cloud? Another question is, could the fifth force and dark energy be the same thing?

Gravitation is the weakest of four fundamental interactions. And the hypothetical graviton is introduced as the gate for the fifth force. The fifth force is predicted to be even weaker than gravitation. But the thing is that Muon g-2 experiments have shown that the fifth interaction might be stronger than the gravitation. And the thing that shows that is the strange curving of the muon in the low energetic particle accelerator. 

But there can be another explanation for that curving. And that thing is that those particles were interacting with the dark energy. Many people including myself, think that dark energy is the wave movement like other interactions are. And that brings one question to my mind. Is dark energy the same thing as the fifth force? 

The reason why I think that thing is that all other fundamental interactions are wave-particle dualities. There are wave movement and particle forms of all other fundamental interactions. And the missing thing is the graviton. If researchers can isolate graviton or turn gravitation waves into gravitons. That thing helps to focus the form of gravitation itself. 

()https://www.iflscience.com/physics/experimental-detector-may-have-spotted-a-new-type-of-gravitational-waves/

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

Image():https://www.iflscience.com/physics/experimental-detector-may-have-spotted-a-new-type-of-gravitational-waves/

()https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Light computer rises the power of the binary computers that are still needed to control quantum computers.

The image above: illustration image

The new light transistors are making 1000 times faster binary computers than ever before. And that thing can make it possible to create more effective binary computers. But also that thing makes the use of quantum computers more effective. 

We are living in the time of quantum computers. So why the speed of regular or binary computers is needed to rise? The thing is that even if quantum computers are turning more and more common there is one thing that is making them limited. 

The data input to the quantum system happens through binary computers. So increasing the speed of binary computers would make that bottleneck between the binary and quantum computers larger. There are two ways to make ultra-fast binary systems that can input or transmit between regular computers and quantum computers. 

The first way is just to make the microcircuits superconducting. The problem with the superconducting microchips is that the electric flow will jump over the switches and routers very easily if the system uses extremely small-size nanotechnical components. 

The other way is to use the light as the data transporter. In the light transistor, the electric flow is replaced by using light. The laser light would travel through the base and collector. And the emitter will inject more laser energy into the laser ray that transmits the data. The light transistor helps to make the temperature of the system low. The routers of the system base the ultra-small mirrors. 

Those mirrors can turn to the wanted angle. Those mirrors turn the laser ray in the wanted direction. And the switches are the mirrors that are closing the route of the laser ray. Transforming the data from the photons to the electric form is quite a simple process. The laser rays will impact the miniature photovoltaic cells that are made by using silicone. That thing would use the photoelectric effect where the light is turning to electricity.

That transforming is needed for turning the data into the form that the peripheral systems like the microchips of display adapters can understand. The problem with quantum computers is that they need binary computers for transmitting data in those systems. The next big step in quantum computing is to make a system that can be controlled straight by using regular keyboards and that can introduce data by using the regular screens. If that kind of system is coming to markets. That thing is a new revolution for quantum computers. But the bottleneck is turning to display adapters and the keyboards and other peripherals. 

()https://scitechdaily.com/new-extremely-energy-efficient-optical-transistor-speeds-up-computation-up-to-1000-times/

()https://www.toppr.com/guides/physics/semiconductors/transistor-working/#:~:text=The%20three%20basic%20parts%20of%20the%20transistors%20are,substance%20is%20in%20use%20to%20make%20the%20transistors%3F

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

Are we children of black holes and neutron stars?

In this text, I will think about the origin of the material. Not how the man got the intelligence. 

Are we children of black holes and neutron stars? The answer to the question depends on the timeline that we are handling. If we think that the history of the material starts in the particles that formed just after the Big Bang straight from the wave movement. 

We can say that subatomic particles that form the protons and neutrons are much older than atoms in our body. Electrons formed also after the Big Bang. And the electromagnetic forces along with microgravity they positioned to orbit protons and neutrons. 

This question is interesting. Every single atom in our body is formed in the nuclear reactions in the stars. Or the hydrogen atoms are formed in the quantum plasma just after the big bang. But are we children of the black holes and neutron stars? The heavier elements are formed in the extreme heat in the largest stars. 

And some of the most extraordinary elements are formed during supernova explosions. Only when the blue giant star is exploding. The energy level rises to the level that forming of the heaviest natural elements are forming. That will explain why the heaviest isotopes are so unusual things in the universe. 

The answer to the question are we children of explosive stars or maybe black holes are not simple. Supernovas, neutron stars, and black holes are creating giant waves around the universe. So those waves are causing a disturbance in the entirety. And that thing means that the material is starting to pile up at the point where the particles have more mass than in other places. 

But otherwise, the history of material is starting just after the Big Bang. And the forming of the material started a long time before the first proton or hydrogen atom formed. The quarks that formed protons and neutrons formed just after the Big Bang. And there were particles which origin was in the wave movement that came to the universe from the Big Bang. 

Image II: The standard model of elementary particles

So there was something that made the quarks forming the protons and neutrons. Sometimes one of the things that caused the piling up of the quarks is introduced Pauli's exclusion principle. Pauli's exclusion principle means that there are no two identical Fermions in the universe. Originally Pauli's exclusion principle went like this: The Pauli exclusion principle is the quantum mechanical principle which states that two or more identical fermions (particles with half-integer spin) cannot occupy the same quantum state within a quantum system simultaneously. 

And the universe can think of as the sum of all quantum systems. The size of the universe was smaller just after the Big Bang. So that means there is the possibility that Pauli's exclusion principle affects at least the entirety of that smaller universe. And there is the possibility that Pauli's exclusion principle shows off even today. The thing is that even if we cannot measure something that thing can be existing. 

Quarks are fermions. So there is no need for modification for that principle. And the thing that makes the difference between those particles is the energy level. Ao the more energetic fermion is heavier and that means it pulls another fermion together. Pauli's Exclusion Principle could be the key to born material. 

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermion

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_physics

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

The image I:()https://lsc.org/news-and-social/news/join-us-live-for-the-astronomy-of-2021-jan-7-at-5-pm

Image II:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

()https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The speed of light is a relative constant.

The speed of light is constant. But it is also relatively constant because the speed of photons is different in different mediums. The curving photon comes to goal after the photon that travels by using straight trajectories. 

And the thing that causes the curving of trajectories of photons is the quantum fields. Outside the universe is no quantum fields. And that means light or photon is traveling there using a straight trajectory. That means two photons can travel in the same direction. But if the other photon travels with a more curving trajectory than the other. That means the other photon that travels less curving trajectory can reach the goal sooner than another photon. 

One interesting thing about the photon or the speed of light is that the gravitation affects the photons. That means that the photon that travels to the center of gravitation travels faster than the photon. That travels away from that point. 

The speed of light in a vacuum is 299792458 meters per second (approximately 300000 km/s, or 186000 mi/s). But the thing that makes the speed of a photon interesting. Is that the speed of light or photons in a medium like water or atmosphere is much lower. Then the speed of a photon is in a vacuum. 

And that thing is seen as the blue light around the nuclear reactors. The blue light is called "Cherenkov' radiation". The origin of "Cherenkov' radiation is in the particles. When those particles travel with the speed of light in a vacuum and hit the water. 

Water decreases the particle's speed to the speed of light in water. The energy cannot disappear and while the particle is slowing, it must transfer the kinetic energy to somewhere. When the particle slows its speed it must pump its energy to somewhere. 

And the energy that is released during the slowing process is visible as the blue light around the nuclear reactors. The same "Cherenkov radiation" causes the blue sky effect. And the blue flash of the particle that slows its speed is used in neutrino detectors. The flash of the light is also used in the free-electron lasers. When the electron is curving it releases the movement energy by sending photons. 

The thing that limits the speed of the light (or the speed of photons) is the scattering. The other photons that impact the photons are slowing their speed. But also the quantum fields around the atoms and other particles cause that the trajectory of those photons is not straight. Because the trajectory of the photon is curving that thing slows the speed of light. 

Outside the universe is no quantum fields. That means photons are traveling faster outside the material bubble called the universe. In that case, the "faster photon" means that the photon that travels by using the straight trajectory is at the goal before the photon that uses a curving trajectory.  

When we are thinking that the universe is the bubble where all material that we know exists. We might think that photons travel faster outside the universe. The reason for that is there are no quantum fields outside the universe. That means the photon can travel by using a straight trajectory. And that means the light travels faster outside the universe. 

The speed of light is not always been the same in the universe. In the young universe, the speed of light was lower than in the modern universe. The reason for that was that the scattering in the young universe was stronger than in the universe today. Youn universe was full of wave movement and traveling electrons where photons impacted. And the trajectories of the photons were more curving than today. 

What if we can create the straight-moving light? The reason why we cannot travel faster than the speed of light. Is that we cannot create exhaust gas that crosses the speed of light. 

Sometimes there is introduced a simple way to make the rocket that travels faster than light. The researchers must just make the light where photons are traveling with straight trajectories. Straight moving photons are faster than the photons that are moving curving trajectories. 

And theoretically, it's enough that the system removes quantum fields around the light source. That thing can make the photons travel faster than they are traveling in regular space. In regular space, quantum fields are making photons curving. And that slows the speed of light or photons.

()https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/10/could-we-ever-travel-faster-than-light-9632400/ 

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light

Image()https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/10/could-we-ever-travel-faster-than-light-9632400/

()https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The flying cars and every-man aerial vehicles are here

The flying car made its first intercity flight in the Czech Republic. The flight took 35 minutes from the international airport in Nitra to the international airport in Bratislava on Jun. 28, 2021. Flying cars are low-cost aircraft that have the capacity also drive on highways. 

The idea of this kind of vehicle is not very new. The first idea of the winged cars that everybody can own and park in their garage was introduced after WWII. At that time technology was not at the level that this kind of vehicle is possible. 

The reason for that is that the engines and batteries were too heavy. And the turbine engines used too much fuel. Turbines are also noisy. And the noise is one thing that is slowing the creation of this type of vehicle. The electric power which uses batteries or fuel cells makes it possible to create lightweight, low-noise flying machines. 

By using modern battery technology is possible to make aerial vehicles that are using electric engines. Some start-ups are working with low-cost electric-powered aerial vehicles which can use for feeder traffic for the airports. But those electric vehicles can also use for rescue missions where people must take from the roofs of the building. 

They can also take hostage-rescue and other law enforcement teams to roofs. But in frontier rescue and military use, flying cars can drive straight out from the cargo planes. And that gives mobility to the operators. By using this kind of technology is possible to land the ambulance on the ground. Then the medical equipment will connect. 

And the flying car will fly the patient to the cargo bay of the VTOL aircraft. In the military world, the ability to land the vehicles without parachutes and fly them away makes noticing those operators more difficult than if they are using regular parachutes. The "flying jeep" must not flight 35 minutes for making the mission where it must jump over the ground and fly in the cargo door of the hovering V-22 "Osprey" type VTOL transporter. 

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

O'Neill cylinders and travel outside the asteroid belt

This artist’s conception from the 1970s shows the interior of an O’Neill cylinder. (Credit: NASA) 

The O'Neill cylinder is theoretical construction of the space station or spacecraft which involves an environment that looks like Earth. There are plantations, houses, and other things that are on Earth. But everything has been made in the rotating cylinder. The centripetal force is making the artificial gravitation inside the cylinder. And that allows the crew to live as they would live on Earth. So that's why the O'Neill cylinder is called the "artificial Earth". 

The creator of that idea Gerard O'Neill introduced that there is a small city in the cylinder. The idea is that the O'Neill cylinder would work as the platform for benefiting the resources of the entire solar system. And maybe that kind of system would make humans travel to another solar system. The question is how that kind of system would get its electric supply? The answer would be the nuclear reactor or fusion power. The problem is that the normal fission reactor would need new fuel after every five years. 

Fusion energy is complicated to produce. But there is always possible to use the generator for making electricity for the artificial world. In that system, there is spacecraft that is connected to the generator. Then the craft orbit around that point. That thing makes the generator rotate and it would make the electricity to the entire space station. Or the cores of the cylinder are turned to the induction generator. 

In the middle of the rotating cylinder would put the rotor. And to the core is installed the stator. That turns the rotating cylinder itself into the generator. The O'Neill cylinder would be an enormous thing. That means the forces that are affecting this structure are enormous. So there is the possibility that the centripetal forces are ripping that megastructure in pieces. 

Maybe that kind of space station is traveling in the solar system. And share goods and people to colonies that will establish to other planets and their moons. There is the possibility that the Mars craft would install rotating structures that are making it possible to grow vegetables in the space. 

When we are thinking about the possibility to create artificial gravitation by using rotating structures. That would not mean that the entire craft must rotate if somewhere is growing vegetables. The parts that are rotating can also connect to other parts of the craft by using bearings. That means that only those parts that are needed for plantations are rotating. Which means the rotating masses are lower. 

()https://space.nss.org/o-neill-cylinder-space-settlement/

Image():https://www.geekwire.com/2016/jeff-bezos-space-colonies-oneill/

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/

What is the alternative explanation for the Brookhaven (Fermilab) observations?

The image above portraits the g−2 storage-ring magnet. That system Located at Fermilab. Originally researchers created that system for the Brookhaven g−2 experiment. The geometry allows for a very uniform magnetic field to establish in the ring. (Wikipedia/Muon g-2)

So what causes the interesting anomaly in the Brookhaven (Fermilab)low-energetic particle accelerator? The answer could be also a very weak gravitational effect. That turns the trajectory of the particle in the Muon g-2 experiment. If the fifth force is not existing could that thing that causes too strong curving in the Brookhaven laboratory be the gravitational wave of another universe? 

The thing is that the "fifth force" is much much weaker than the gravity. It's harder to see than other natural interactions. And there is the possibility that it's not even existed. But there is also the possibility that the scale of the "fifth force" is extremely large. 

Maybe it's visible only in the interactions of galaxies. Or maybe we could see the effect of this mystery from outside the entire universe. There is the possibility that the fifth force is not seen inside the universe because its form is a monotonic hum. In that case, we cannot see the changes of that force. 

Or if the effect of the fifth force can measure only between extremely large entireties that means we cannot see that thing. The other interactions are covering the fifth force. 

So another explanation why the mysterious "fifth force" is hiding is this: because the force is stable there is a problem with how to measure it. The "fifth force", if it exists is a similar wave-particle duality with other forces. 

But let's go to business and try to find out why the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN has not seen the same things. Those are observed in the Brookhaven laboratory? The reason for that is simple. The LHC uses too much energy. And that means the weak interactions are not able to affect the trajectories of those particles. The Brookhaven laboratory uses much smaller energy loads than the LHC. And the weaker forces can affect the trajectories of the particles that are traveling in the accelerator of the Brookhaven laboratory. 

So if we are trying to compile why the Brookhaven accelerator is more suitable for observing weak natural interactions than the LHC we can use bullets as an example. The side wind would have more effect on the slow-flying bullet than the fast bullet. The reason for that is that the frontal pointing movement energy is higher in the fast-moving bullet. 

The wind effect of the slow-moving bullet is higher and the outcoming interaction like gravity wave is acting like the wind in the case of the bullet. At the first friction must slow the speed of the bullet so slow that the sidewind can push it out from the trajectory. 

The slow-moving low energetic particle is easier to push out from the trajectory than the fast-moving particle. The particle's speed in the LHC is near the speed of light. And the weak wave movement effect to so fast particles is harder to observe than the similar effect to the lower energetic and slower-moving particle. That's why Brookhaven laboratory sees anomalies that are not able to be seen by the LHC. 

()https://astronomy.com/news/2020/03/the-fifth-force-what-is-it

()https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-measure-the-magic-fine-structure-constant-20201202/#comments

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookhaven_National_Laboratory

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_force

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_g-2

()https://visionsoftheaiandfuture.blogspot.com/