Tuesday, July 23, 2019

Monopoly is the game with tactics and business

Monopoly is the game with tactics and business

There has been many theories and research made for the games and their relationship with the real world. Those researches have been made by request of authorities and some institutes for uncovering the ability of an inmate to control things like business or some other tactical things. The idea is to turn their interest in the young age in the right direction because those people are suitable for the train to the high position of the important role to society of business and government. 

Many times there have been claimes that Monopoly is a boring game, but it uncovers the people able to think like businessmen, and the main thing, what people should while playing this game is to buy cartels and break other people able to create own cartels. That thing happens by buying the squares around the game, and that thing would show, how good tactical eye somebody would have.

 The thing in that game is that the gamer can win the game by driving other players to bankruptcy, and that shows the real faces of capitalism. The Monopoly game allows the gamer to control the prizes and other players would just lose their money. Even if the player has the most expensive lots, that person can not make anything, if the competitor owns the rest of the gameboard.

The volume of that another player is so large if that person operates with houses and hotels, that the owner of the most expensive lots would be loose all the money. And the competitor can just pump all the money from that player. In this case, the most expensive hotels cannot fix the loss of money. Those things show if the person has skills to make business, in the new hectic multicultural environment.

The image is one of the most important things in modern showbusiness

The image is one of the most important things in modern showbusiness

When we are looking at old music videos from the net, we are seeing the artists, who have extravagant clothes and haircut, what seems to be like straight from the Louis XIV era. The thing, what we can see, when we are making compartments with those old-timer artists to modern artists, we are seeing the changes, what the form of the star has been experienced.

While watching those videos, we can see, how society has been transformed that formation. And the most radical change is that the fantasy characters at the stage have transformed into the normal looking people, who wear normal clothes.

But how we can see that the thing is the image? That kind of thing is very easy to notice if the person uses the same clothes at the stage, and interviews all the time. The thing would be noticed if the inmate wears all the time the same skirts and shoes. And the thing, that person explains, why uses some clothes is a remarkable thing.

This advantage is visible in the modern show concept. Modern artists are sponsored by many trademarks and those trademarks are marketed to regular people. And in the modern era also cheap trademarks are sponsoring artists. They want their products are visible, and that would make a new type of artists, the neighborhood boy or girl, who dress like normal people while keeping the show.

Who was David Hilbert?

Who was David Hilbert?

Everybody who has read about the "Mathematical millennium problems" is read about the man named David Hilbert (1862-1943). Hilbert was a remarkable mathematician and, sadly, the work of that man, what the great audience knows are those 23 Millenium problems, which are known as Hilbert's problems.

That man created really interesting and fascinating work with researching and fixing the Euclidean theories of geometry, and the errors in Euclidean axioms. Hilbert introduced ten of those problems in Paris  (1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 13, 16, 19, 21, and 22), and the rest of them were introduced in somewhere else.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_problems) 

 And the thing, what makes this interesting is, what were his merits in the year 1900 when he introduced that series Millenium problem of the mathematics? He was 38 years old at that time, and maybe he had invented something big because he took that famous lecture. So who asked about that lecture?

Those 23 problems are a really good tool for calculating things like geometrical models or prime numbers, for making some suitable solutions for those things needs superfast computers. There are many questions on the list of those problems and the main problem is, who choose those problems for that list?

And why Hilbert introduced them during his famous lecture? Hilbert made very pervasive work during his career with Euclidean mathematical and geometrical problems and fixed the errors in those calculations. And he created the idea of "Hilbert's space". He investigated the errors, what was visible in Euclidean theories and natural solution.

Those errors are minimum, but they are visible. That means that the Euclidean parallel axiom is not valid anymore, and the non-Euclid geometry is not involved sentence" the sum of the angles of the triangle is 180 degrees". 

The term "axiom" is very well explained in Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom) but suddenly I have thought that is it possible that Hilbert made a linguistic mistake during his work, and made mistake with words "axiom" and "axal", what looks like almost same. And if the writer is tired, there would be mistakes with that kind of words.

If the persons own home language is something else than English, those kinds of mistakes are really common, and when we are thinking about Hilbert, could it be possible, that he wrote those texts in English? So if the word "axal" is meant by Hilbert, that would mean that there would be differences with the forms of geometrical structures in nature, that what they suppose to be, when Hilbert calculated them by using sharp and long decimal numbers. But this kind of things are only the theories, about that remarkable geometrician.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Why Russian intelligence needs oligarchs?


Why Russian intelligence needs oligarchs?

One thing, what must be realized with social media, what you see in the western world might not the same, what they are in Russia. This is the thing, what have many times told in the western media, but the thing what has put less focus in media is that also Russian homepages can change by western actors. This means that the social media used by Russians in Russia might be different in the western world. That thing is very easy to make, and the system is very simple in theory.

That social media and the data, what users input in that system would search by algorithms, and then the artificial intelligence just removes things, what is not tolerated. The thing is that the server transforms the data to another homepage, which is similar to the real homepage.  the reason, why western military intelligence is concerning about the Russian social media, is that the intelligence services are using those platforms to keep in touch with contacts.

The new way to operate in Russian intelligence and security is that those organizations are operated by using oligarchs for buying the real estates and establishing the companies, what the intelligence can use in its operations. I just read the article in Helsingin Sanomat (21.7.2019) what told about the journalist, who has been uncovered corruption and other things about Russian security services, and I noticed about the name in that article.

That name was Yevgeny Prigodzhin. That man worked as the gang member for some Russian businessmen and was in jail for getting under-age girls for prostitutes, betrayals and robberies.

Those things were mentioned in the article, and when we are thinking about the past of Pridgodzhin, that would make that man the perfect tool for the hands of intelligence. Those kind of people are suitable for open the bank accounts and establish companies for covert operations, like buying real-estates for storing the equipment and housing the operatives, who cannot use regular hotels.

And the thing is, that if that actor would someday start to be the problem, that means that there would be found some overdose or something like that in the past, and then the police can arrest that man. Of course, the prosecutions would be something like tax avoidance, but if the person would not cooperate there would be find something worse in history.

When we are looking at the way, how intelligence service operates, there would be no person in service, who they cannot control. That means that the oligarch, who would operate with Intelligence is under the control of those agents, who would play the bodyguards of that person. And that means that the person is imprisoned in own office.

Monday, July 22, 2019

From cloud to multi-cloud

From cloud to multi-cloud

ICT-business is the most innovative sector in the field of business. The reason for that innovation and hectic way to make things is that the software business is handling the virtual tools, what are not need physical investments. Every person in the world, who has the right skills can try those things even at home, and that means the new type of solutions are created all the time, and this thing makes computer business so innovative and interesting working area. Trends in that are changing extremely fast, and when somebody creates something, the competitors must make something better.

Multi-cloud is the trend of computing. That means that the person is connected with the Internet with multiple cloud-based systems, what is making the database operations more flexible and sophisticated. In the multi-cloud architecture data processing systems are all connected to the network all the time, as they could be in single-cloud architecture. But the main idea of this kind of systems is that the clouds are operating like single computers.

And the cloud is computing service, what the user cannot control or see. In the cloud the thing, what the user gets is the application, and that means that they cannot see, what kind of server systems runs that service. Cloud means every process what happens in the cloud is distributed to many servers, and the databases would also be in multiple places, even if they seem to be one. 

The name"cloud" means that the service is the thing, what the client gents, and that is the only thing, what that person needs, and the situation is, that the operating system of the service and technical details of the servers are hidden from end-user. First, this technology has been used as the hard calculations, but then it has been grown to use with other solutions.

The benefit of that kind of system is, that the service is guaranteed even in the server would be destroyed by some kind of accident. In the cloud service, the most important thing is that the service would continue without errors in every case, and the normal service routines must be done without disturbing the service.

That means that when the operating system updates would run to the server, the updates would download to another server, and then the service will swap to run under that server, and then another server will be updated. In net-based service, every system is actually at least doubled, because that would make the service sure in the special situations. And in multi-cloud, every data-handling unit is cloud, which means that there are multiple computers for each service.


The strange and silly theory about the timeless civilization

The strange and silly theory about the timeless civilization

When Albert Einstein created the Theory of Relativity, he invented that the speed of the time would be connected to the mass or speed. And if the speed and gravity would slow time, the induction thought would be that the energy would slow the time, and that will cause the slowing of the clock.

This means that the energy could also cause the slowing time, which has proven because of the difference between atoms clocks in the GPS satellites and ground station would run at different time. That thing proved that Einstein was right. And at the next in this text, there comes a couple of fictional writings about that thing.

Or the first one is the thing that tells about the fictional theory about civilization, what would be timeless. And the second one would tell about the fictional character, what would have a mouth in the hands.  I found those topics from some old papers, what I have been written, and I decided to share them for you.

1. I sometimes have thought that there is a possibility, that the super civilization would have the ability to turn themselves timeless by landing on the event horizon of the black hole. In that case, the fictional or hypothetical civilization would orbit the black hole in the level of the event horizon, that their space station would travel by the speed of the light. 

And the speed would slow or even stop the time, what would make that hypothetical civilization timeless, which means that they can live forever. Or at least their civilization would not be connected to the time. In this case, civilization would benefit the black hole as some kind of time machine.

2. The character, or alien what would have a mouth in hand would not seem to be dangerous. There would not be mouth with teeth in the hand. The mouth could be like some kind of disk, what the bugs have. 

Or the sweat from the hands would contain the enzymes, what would liquidize the nutrient. And the duct would take that nutrient in the body of that character. This thing would not be intelligent, but there are theories that some aliens would have that kind of ability.

But in fact, in officially we would not have a single alien in custody, and that's why the thing, what is called as the cosmos biology would be more writing of the science fiction novels than using the observations of the humanoids. Before we would meet the first alien or the extraterrestrial living habitant, we can write and think almost everything about those characts.

Because the extraterrestrial habitat might look like totally different than we are. And before we see the first one that thing,  everything that we are writing and talking about those things is purely hypothetical fiction.

The use of a source in writings and comments

The use of a source in writings and comments

When people are using sources in writings, those sources should be that everybody can confirm that data by using the same sources, what the first writer has been used. This is the normal rule in life. If the person uses the discussion or some other thing like a lecture as the source, that person should identify the source sharply.

That thing is that there should mention the date and time and the place, where that lecture has been given, and who was the person, who gave the lecture. Things like a lecture in the year 1900 at some university in Paris are not very sharp data.

Of course, the source would be mention in the form "the lecture, what Dr. David Hilbert gave in the international mathematical conference in Paris in the year 1900". But if the person tells that the lecture was given in Paris in some year is not a very sharp way to give the sources.

Of course, David Hilbert could give many lectures during that meeting, and that's why some tip to lecture, like "lecture where Hilbert introduced the Millenium problems for mathematics" or something like that would be a good tip if somebody would like to check facts and ask the minutes or records of that lecture from the host. This kind of data will be useful information if somebody wants to check, what Hilbert said in those lectures, and that would also contain the data, what other people were taking in that meeting.

The first drone that can reach an altitude of 10,000 meters is here.

“Meteomatics' Strato multicopter drone.” (Interesting Engineering) Swiss company called Meteomatics created a drone. It reaches an altit...