A new planet has been found 31 light-years away

Image: David A. Hardy

A new planet has been found 31 light-years away

NASA informs that it has found planet from 30 light-years away, what is in the right distance from the star. And that kind of exoplanets is fascinating in many ways. In the next writing, I will think, what would we do, if we will someday colonize that kind of planet.

If we would want someday colonize that kind of planets we might have a vision in our eyes, that we would land on that planet and walk around it by arming some kind of rifles. But if we would land on that planet or fly to that solar system, there are two versions of the possibility, what we might find in that strange world.

1. If the planet is similar to Eart

This case is given visions to many romantic space movies, but in real life, if we would land to that planet, we might face many dangers, what we ever expected. The surface of the planet could be full of life forms like bacteria, which might use our tissues as the nutrient. And this thing makes the planets, what has similar conditions more dangerous to us than the planet, which has only the hostile atmosphere or some kind of radiation.

Chemical dangers like chlorine are easier to control than some organism, what might be different, what we see on the Earth. And if we would think cases, that we would travel on the surface of this habitable planet, we cannot step even on the grass, because it might be the tentacle for hunting prey, because that thing might not be the grass. In that strange world would live life forms, like medusas, what can live on dry land, and that makes this planet very dangerous.

There have been plans, that the planet, what is full of dangerous species, what are the level of bacteria would transform similar to Earth by melting its entire lithosphere. That would happen by using kinetic energy rocket.

Or sometimes the planet would be targeted to an asteroid, where is connected the ion motors, which will impact the lithosphere with very high speed, and it would melt it immediately. That thing would sterilize the planet very effectively, and then the bacteria and other things would deliver on that planet, but there are many moral and ethic questions about that thing.

2. Planet what has no life forms

In this case, the planet would be safer than the planet, what has life forms. The gas can keep out the spacecraft, and the thing is that this kind of worlds can make similar to Earth by using bacteria and cells to transform the atmosphere. And if there would be no water, it can be brought from the space, or sharper to say the stars own Oort cloud, where could be found many icy asteroids.

But if there is another possibility to make water, and that can be done by simply burning the hydrogen, where the exhaust would be water. And the hydrogen is the most common particle in the universe. Oxygen can isolate from the chemical combinations like carbon dioxide. And sometimes has been introduced that planet Venus can transform like Earth by simply filtering the atmosphere by using active carbon filters, and the gas would be pulled through the filters, what are used in the submarines.

But that equipment, what is used in this plan would be bigger. The system would be the tube or smoke pipe, which will suck the gas through the carbon filter, which is similar, which is used in the gas masks. This can separate the carbon from oxygen, and it would transform the atmosphere of Venus, and what works in Venus would work also on another planet. But it takes a long time.

https://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-tess-telescope-habitable-world-31-light-years-away-2019-7?fbclid=IwAR0ZTZzDmLzo98XpgBlr5mWfgwhKcUYd6WUN5-3wgWklcPPsc-YSxJtIl0E&r=US&IR=T

When vandals take control of the city

When vandals take control of the city

Vandalism is the thing, what costs lots of money to society every year. Most of those cases of vandalism are made to private or public property. And sometimes vandalism is used as the blackmailing tool. The gangsters have given orders, that people should pay the protection money to them, or their houses or firms would burn, or the trucks of the transportation companies would get sugar to their tank.

This kind of actions has been used to drive competitor to bankruptcy. Otherwise, the person, who has failed from some company because of cheating has got a warning, that the car would be crushed, if the mouth would not keep shut. This kind of things is really interesting because sometimes the makers of the damage have been underage persons.

There has also happened that the damages, what are made in purpose have been made for framing some uncomfortable person guilty to those happenings, and that thing might feel clever. But the investigator must show that the named person has been made some crimes. Or if there is no proof, that suspect must be released. 

When the crimes have been made, the people who get benefit from the crime are suspects. If the person, who breaks the places, what are reserved for youngsters is young, that thing seems very interesting, because those persons are breaking things, what are meant for them.

Or other ways to say, those persons are eating their bread when they are making that kind of things. And then the investigator should ask, is there something, what those people are wanted to hide when they are making that kind of things. If the youth center is destroyed, the thing is that this would give a very good excuse for being out of that place.

So is the reason for vandalism the will to stay out from the place, because those people have something to hide about, what they have done in the school? If those people have cheated others, they would not want to meet those victims, because that would feel a little bit uncomfortable. And the reason for cheating is sometimes purely because that victim or the family want to smoke out from the area.

Sometimes in the cheating cases, there have been adults behind those youngsters and in those cases the way, how those people dare or allowed to make contact with their underage torpedoes is interesting. Why the parents of those youngsters didn't notice the thing, that their children are hanging in the wrong company? This kind of things is interesting topics for research.

How much is much?

How much is much?

Sometimes we all see the news about nursery services, which has not enough workers. Sometimes I have thought, that how those nursery companies even dare to take patients because there are only two or three nurses for maybe tens of patients, and that number of staff is enough? So what if something happens during those shifts?

And in the cases that there is so little personnel on work, that it's dangerous for patients, that thing brings my mind the question, should there be some nurses or doctors, who have not come to work? If the thing is like that, why that thing has not mentioned in reports? Or why those people have not called to authorities, that nurses have not come to work?

One thing, what is interesting is, why that thing satisfies patients and their families? Why the small number of personnel is not caused reclamations, and why people who are living in that kind of institutes are not telling a thing to their families?

The things, what satisfies us might be different to someone else, and the things what are dare to us might be meaningless to other people. If a person repeats some words, they are important to that inmate and gives satisfaction. The satisfaction is very well seen in the writings and speeches, what a person makes. When we are thinking about things, what seems meaningless for us, we almost ever think, that for someone else those things are very important.

So what this means? When we will go to the city, we might want to drink a cup of coffee, and then we just go to the cafeteria and take that cup, it doesn't cost very much and that's it. But have you ever thought about an underage person, who wants that cup of coffee? Buying that thing is not so easy thing to them. 

They must find the place, where is no age limit, and then they must have money for buying that cup of coffee. This kind of things is what we must realize when we are making something. Things that are easy to get might be hard for somebody else. So when we are thinking about the way, how people write about things what they have written or spoken? Have you ever thought about cases, where people have written or spoken something that is not tolerated about some other person?

When somebody has mentioned, that some other person has mental problems or that person is somehow incompetent in public writing, and the knowledge is wrong, that could cost very much because of the juridical payments. In those cases, a person must believe, that the thing, what has been written is right. Or actually, the writer must hope that the thing, what has been spread is true. And sometimes this hope causes the phenomenon, that the writer just uses or fixes some term, what supports the last thing, what that person has been spread.

Here I must ask one little question, what is "is it right to leave a customer without service, even that person is incompetent"? This is a very interesting question. Incompetence is not a thing, what justifies to act how people want to act, and that kind of things are not meant for justifying criminal activities and other kinds of things like unnecessary removings from the area.

When we are talking about things like sending faked job applications, I have thought that maybe those people, who are making practical jokes, like sending job applications for other people would like to do those jobs themselves, because they are asking them to others? If somebody thinks that it's a very good improvement to social skills, that person washes some stairways, that person should make those jobs one summer. This kind of thing could be very teaching lesson, how that kind of jobs is improving social skills.

The writing about the Russian sea routes.

The writing about the Russian sea routes.

How Russia would make a trade or otherwise benefit the western sea routes if it goes to war against Western nations? This is one very big question when we are looking at the news, what are telling about the Russian new naval exercise in the Baltic Sea. If the Russian Navy wants to break to the sea, the Murmansk region would be better placed for that kind of actions, because the open sea would give more room to make movements than the Baltic Sea.

The Russian invasion is a very good threat and at the same time argument for people, who want to return to the past, when people like President of Finland had the right to term people like processors in the office. That kind of rights are somehow interesting because they are telling, that president must hear only things, what that person wants.

The thing is that somebody believes that the Russian naval exercise would give the leaders of the political movements opportunity to go behind those exercises and request that the people should keep their opinions about Russian politics and exercises in their mind. Fear is the best weapon, what mankind has ever created.

And that means that when the newspapers are full of stories about the power and effectiveness of Russian weapons people would believe to shut their mouth because of the fear of the Russian weapons is so high. And of course, there is an international journalist, who would get in trouble, if somebody will write something against the benefit of the Russian state or its benefit. 

This thing brings my mind one very interesting idea, and that is, why those reporters would go to follow those naval exercises? If somebody would feel getting in trouble in some areas, should those places avoid? Why people go to follow that kind of exercises if they are afraid of violence or attack against themselves?

Sometimes I have heard, that this kind of things have been a popular way to make some people keep their mouth shut. The offering self as a hostage would seem nice, but in those cases, a person must be sure, that there is found friends on another side. If there are no friends, there would be a very bad situation, because if somebody else would not care about this person at all. And those cases hurts. But Russia doesn't take hostages, because it has underlined the international contracts about this kind of things.

Why Russian military exercises are in Baltic sea, but its interests are in the arctic area?

Why Russian military exercises are in Baltic sea, but its interests are in the arctic area?

There is one answer to that question and that is the Baltic sea is more suitable for training area than Barents sea, because water is not so deep in the Baltic sea, and the area is smaller. If submarine would hit to the bottom of the sea, the crew is easier to rescue than in the deep sea areas.

Also, the ships and other vessels are finding each other easier in the Baltic sea, but there is one thing, what would raise the value of Baltic sea in the eyes of Kremlin. That is publicity. Every single movement, what those troops make can be confirmed from the neutral states, and leaders of Russia hopes that those orgulous military exercises with highly trained troops would help Russia in their political purposes in the internal politics of those countries.

And also the Russian headquarters hopes that the psychological effect would shut the mouths of the persons, who are supporting the foreign policy, what Russians think as hostile. The message what Russian military wants to give is that every hostile action against Russia would be responded with force. One thing, what is the goal of the Russian political control is that the freedom of speech against the leaders of Russia must be stopped. 

The actions, what Kremlin has made against political opposition are not things, what it wants to show to western- or any media. In those cases, the best thing, what those leaders would hope, is that people would be silent about arresting. And the answer, what Kremlin leaders would give to people is that they got food and circus pleasures. Normal people would not need to take part in politics, because the decisions are made by using information, what is not public. And that supports the power of Putin and his closest men.

When we are thinking about the military exercises in the Baltic sea, that place would be better to flight camera crews above the air cushion vehicles and highly trained special forces. Another thing, what is meant for supporting people, who are conforming the politics of Kremlin are high-yield thermonuclear weapons, what mission is to give an excuse to follow the rules of Kremlin.

And if those weapons would be used the destruction area would be thousands of kilometers. If Kremlin decides to use 60 megatons nuclear weapons would destroy entire Europe if they are dropped to Berlin. The 50 megatons "Tsar" bomb created the pressure wave, what traveled three times around the world when it was detonated in above Novaya-Zemlya in the 30 October  1963. This device is the highest power thermonuclear device, which has ever detonated in the atmosphere. And the same yield warheads have been installed in the Russian SS-18 "Satan" missiles. Those missiles are the biggest nuclear missiles, which is in service in any country.

Writing about dictatorship

Writing about dictatorship

Do you know that the laws, what is protecting the dictatorship are created for protecting the state against the outland enemies? When the Roman Empire was under threat the power was put in one hand for protecting the state. After that, some people have thought that the leader of the state must have dictatorial authority in the state.

One of the defense for that thing is simply, what we would do with the head of the state, who has no power? Why we have presidential elections if that person would not have the right to scatter the parliament? 

The problem those things is, that when the policy in parliament is similar to policy and opinions of the headman of the state, there is no problem with those laws, what is supporting the personal power of the head of the state. But when the head of state is in opposition to the majority of people or members of the parliament, would there always find people, who are supporting the constitution, what gives the head of the state authorities and justifies the disbanding or scatter the parliament.

And there are many people, who want to support that kind of actions, end their argument is many times that the constitution has given those powers for the head of the state. So why the head of the state might not use those authorizations, because the constitution justifies those kinds of actions? The answer to the differences of opinions would be simple. The riot police would deny the parliamentarians enter their workplace, and then the power would be in the hands of the head of the state. The reason for that is the head of the state would perceive being over politics.

This kind of thing is a very dangerous way to think. When the laws, what supported the limitless power of the monarchy were establish the monarchs were civilized and enlightened persons, but sooner or later the power was given to a person, who was a despot. 

In this case, we must say that one thing what could be worse to the state than a dictator is a popular dictator. That means that the popularity in the eyes of the majority would hide the merciless persecution and use of power, and that would drive the nation to chaos.

Sometimes the dictator will get old and after that, the closest men of that person would start to fight, who would get the power in their hand, and that might drive the nation to civil war. The problem with strong leadership is, this kind of places will want to get by using the force.

If the person, who has power self has made crimes against own people, that means that maybe nobody cares, what happens to that dictator. This fate has faced the King of England Henry VIII and Joseph Stalin, who just left without help when they faced their final moments. That tells about the attitude of people to those men. When they couldn't give orders anymore, that thing caused that own men attacked them, because they wanted to get the same power, what those leaders have.

Far away in future, we might colonize the entire galaxy

Far away in future, we might colonize the entire galaxy

Einstein's theory of UFO:s is that they are man-made machines, what were created by human civilization, what lived on Earth about 20 000-30 000 years ago. 

This theory what I introduced above this texts has brought many ideas in my mind. If we would sometimes create settlements to another solar system those people would turn to humanoids to us. If we would not keep a connection with those colonies, they will forget us, as well as we forget those colonies. If we cannot create communication system, what bases to the wormhole, there are two ways to communicate with that colony.

That is high-power laser or maser communication, or use the small size spacecraft, what will carry messages between colony and Earth. That system would be similar, like messages in a bottle, and if those small-sized spacecraft would reach the speed of light they could be so fast what the radio-waves or laser rays are.

Hypothesis about the war against colonies. 

But anyway, the communication from the light-years is hard, if there are no wormholes in use. And one problem with maser- and laser-based communication is that what if the antenna would turn away from Earth? In those cases, the antenna would send the messages past the Earth, and that would cause problems because of those colonialists have ever seen Earth, if they have sent as the fetuses to the journey. And if the colonialists would someday think that they are only giving part in the relationship with Earth, they can cut the connection, what is understandable. Why they would serve Earth if the connection has no benefit to them. And this might cause the war between stars.

If those small communication crafts would be used as weapons, the destruction would be horrifying. When those capsules hit the planet with the speed of light, the entire planet would be terminated. And this is one problem with space colonies. The most feared thing is that history is repeating itself on a larger scale than ever before.

In history, all nations from Ancient Greeks to Great Britain have been gone to war against their colonies, and if the Earth would go to war against its colonies. There has ever been this kind of situation because there has ever used so powerful and highly advanced technology before than in this hypothetical war between stars. 

And one of them is that it is possible that those aliens would come quite near to us. When we are thinking about the possibility, that the aliens would be grown on the asteroid or moon, what is covered by the giant structure, what makes the surface of the moon like a greenhouse.

If that solid surface would be covered also by water layer, that thing would serve the colony as the protector against radiation. The glass layer, what would build above the pylons would keep the atmosphere around the moon, what might have very weak gravity field.

And that thing would explain the strange mold of the humanoids.  Also, this water can be used as drinking and life support. Sometimes I get ideas, what might look like a little bit weird, but if we would want to create a colony to the planet what would be a little bit too hot, or what orbits the star, what would turn to a red giant, there is a possibility to protect life on that planet by a very simple invention.

The entire surface of that planet would be covered by using umbrellas, and this thing would make possible to adjust the level of radiation on the surface of this planet. This thing is a very fascinating idea for saving a life in the case, where the cosmic catastrophe would face some planet. Those umbrellas can also be covered by using a thin layer of gold, and that thing would help to cover the planet from the cosmic catastrophe like gamma-ray bursts.

In the distant future, we might create colonies on the planets, what orbit other stars. Maybe some of those stars would be flare-stars or red dwarfs, what are very unstable but otherwise interesting particles in the universe.

If the planet would orbit the flare star, in the atmosphere would release a massive amount of water, or there could be made the artificial cloud layer for protecting the colony against the flare. There could be systems, which will give a warning about forming flare, and that would give warning to the colonialists to go to cover, and the thing is that the glass what protects that colony would be dim by pulling the blind closed. This kind of structures can be used in the colonies far in the future.