If we would transfer our mind to computer memory, would we feel and hear like in the natural world?

If we would transfer our mind to computer memory, would we feel and hear like in the natural world?

The idea of copying the human mind in the computer is caused theoretical thinking, what would we feel, if we would able someday copy our mind in the computer and Internet. Would we feel that thing, or would we live in the electric dreamworld, until we can transfer our mind in another body? When we are thinking about the case, that every single memory in our life would be recorded to memory of the computer by using the microchip.

This microchip would be the ultimate tool what allows the brains to load the data non-stop to the Internet, we are facing the philosophical and maybe also psychological problem, that even if we can clone the body, and transfer the mind or electric vortex to another body, would that person be the same? Even if the behavior of the clone would be similar to the original person, we must think, is that person the same?

That thing is that there is many "if" and transforming things in the human brains, that we could probably ever make the perfect transplant of the mind.  The idea is when we are thinking about the case, where the human mind would transfer to the memory of a computer, we would face the reality, that it is impossible to make enough connections in the computer, that their calculating power would be the small part of the human brain capacity.

So if we are thinking about the situation, that we could transfer our mind to the quantum computer. Would that thing, be that we would live like in some kind of "Tron" movie? Sometimes we are facing the theory or philosophical thought, that the human lives in the computer memory. That thing would be very interesting, and in some version, the philosophers have thought, that how many internal computer virtual world could have existed.

The virtual multiverse can be created by using the computer and programs. Virtual space would handle as the universe and that allows to create the virtual multiverse by connecting those virtual worlds. 

Have you seen a dream, that you see dreams? How many of those internal experiences could be possible? And how many internal virtual worlds might be in the computer memory? The thing is that the world inside the memory of computers can understand as the virtual universe.

And in this version on the Internet might be the virtual multiverse, where the virtual universes are internal, and they can be also equivalent. That means that there would be similar virtual worlds, which can be created by human, or in some interesting theories the virtual world can form spontaneously by the crab code, what cannot be destroyed by the user of the Internet.

This is because the code is in multiple places, and the erase-orders would not be effective in that scale of the cloud system. The data is stored in multiple places, and every piece of data involves the code, what algorithm uses when it collects the data because the bits must be in a certain order.

In this case, the computer would not find every single piece of information if the higher level of the bite of the code would be destroyed. And maybe that code would create the virtual wastelands on the Internet. Who knows what happens on the Internet, what is the most important tool in modern society. And maybe computers would collect that code to the place, what is hidden from the users, and that thing might be the topics of some new movie or book, where the heroes would go in the Internet wasteland.

The strange idea what has taken from maypole, what can save people, who are in the radioactive area

The strange idea what has taken from maypole, what can save people, who are in the radioactive area

Do you know, what is maypole? Maypole is the thing, what looks like a flagpole, and people are running around it.  There have been introduced an interesting idea that this kind of structure would someday save a human from radioactive alpha and beta radiation. The idea is that there are magnets in that structure, which will make electrons and helium ions to change the direction, and that thing would be used in the highly radioactive area.

If the structure is loaded with the negative polarity of electricity like the knob only would be electrized, that would turn the electrons away, and at the same time pull the helium-ions to the knob. This thing makes the people, who are standing near that structure ability to avoid the radiation.

By the way, do you know, what means high voltage electricity transfer wirelessly? And do you know why we don't use Tesla's way to transfer electricity wirelessly through the air? That machine would, of course, create plasma in the air. But there is a danger, that the thing like Wardenclyffe-machine would turn to beta-cannon, what can damage the genomes of humans and animals. 

At last, I want to introduce interesting, but little bit exotic theory about flagpoles. That kind of theories is normally or sometimes the origin of the extraordinary inventions. Sometimes those inventions would be a useless or little bit too complicated, but the origin of those strange inventions are the strange theories.

There has been introduced an interesting vision or theory, that ancient aliens have left the structures maypole and flagpole in our life on Earth. That thing looks a little bit "exotic", but, if we would want to make the house to the area, what is highly radioactive we would use the flagpole looking structure, what would pull the radioactive radiation away from the base or house.

More about the non-physical Virtual Reality or VR-solution

More about the non-physical Virtual Reality or VR-solution

GPS can give real freedom of the user of VR-gloves. These VR-gloves can replace by using the GPS-chips, which will be glued to the nails

In the wildest scenarios the GPS, what will put in the fingers, would be used as the VR-gloves. That system would installed on the nails by using glue, and it can be covered with cosmetic manicures. And the other GPS devices would be put on the pieces of jewelry or wristwatch, and that thing bases the operation the sharp location detector of GPS-system.

The data transmitter can communicate with portable data handling system like the mobile telephone, and they can be connected to the Internet and the smart glasses, which are created by Apple and other companies. Those systems, what bases the group of sharp GPS-locators can be used as the normal Virtual Reality data set. But it would be more flexible and lightweight.

Also, the RFID sensors can be used in that purpose and the controlling system, what is installed in the wristwatch would notice the position of the fingers. That system would use GPS to find the position of the hand. 

The regular mobile telephone can also be used in that purpose. And there is no need for laser scanners.

The thing is that the non-physical VR-gloves could also operate with a normal mobile telephone, which connects the image and the SONAR-system, what meters the distance. The problem is that the device must have the sound-echo from the material, that it can meter the distance. In that version, the selfie-stick would help to make the mobile telephone in a stable place, and the rings or some jewelry in the hands would make a better contrast for the camera and focus system. But those things are not necessary.

That means that any ring in the finger would make possible to locate the distance to the hand. And the camera would detect the position to hand, and the user of the system would not probably need any external tools for locating the hand. And that system can be connected to VR-glasses and the regular VR-system. That means that the mobile telephone would get a new way to operate.

Modern technology gives big advantages for tools like Virtual Reality (VR) gloves

Modern technology gives big advantages for tools like Virtual Reality (VR)  gloves

Virtual gloves are important tools when the objects are moving in virtual space. But those gloves can be used also to control the real machines in a multi-tasking virtual environment. In this kind of interfaces, the user can move objects like balls around the space, or they can click themselves in the ball, and find themselves in the virtual multi-universe. But the real thing in virtual space is that this thing can communicate with real machines, what is operating in a real environment.

The problem with this kind of systems has been that those things have ever been mobile before. but modern technology can make the true mobile version of the virtual reality tools true. Those systems might base the same technology, which is used to make the mobile telephone the 3D scanner, but in this time the system would operate as the virtual gloves.

The laser scanner in portable 3D glasses can scan hands, and make the physical VR gloves unnecessary. The movement of hands would be filmed, and they might be the same purpose, what the physical gloves have. And that system can use in the outside and cold weather because that allows using normal thermal gloves at the same time. 

The thing is that the system makes the image of the hands by using the laser-scanner, which is connected with portable VR-glasses, and the system is communicating with a mobile telephone with the Internet. If the user of this device would have a power pack or extra-battery in the belt, that would make this thing real. If the system needs extra calculating power, it would be made by installing the mobile telephone computer circuit in the VR-glasses.

That system can use in the same operations with regular VR-systems, and it can control robots in the field, and the person can sit at the same time at the garden. This system can also scan the fingerprints, which denies the misuse of the system, or unauthorized use of the tools, or sad to say, weapons, what that kind of system can remote control.

The question about social media is who owns those services?

The question about social media is who owns those services? 

And what kind of data would be interesting the spies? The answer is the data, which can be used for blackmailing operations. If some politician or net activist, who claims to fight for the animal rights would be a catch for the hunting trip to Africa, those persons might lose their friends and the voters of those people might leave.

When the leaders of the social media companies are telling about their privacy policies, and that they don't share their information with the other service providers or marketing services, we always forget one thing. There might be long chains of the companies between the real owner and social media service, and that means that the real owner of the social media company can own many other services.

And the things, what would those companies get from the Internet are giving them to make a psychological profile of that person. If we are thinking about the ability to connect data, what is collected from some different social media applications, we would see, how the public opinion differs from the private discussions. 

But if we would connect data from the social media and as an example the bookstore, we can find many things about the targeted person opinions, attitudes, and orientations. One thing is that the data, what would be collected can uncover many things. There are some little mistakes, what uncover if the person might be different, what claims to be.

One is that if the person, who claims to be a woman, often buys underpants, what is meant for men. Of course, that person can buy them to husband, or the man buys often pantyhoses tampons and make-ups, would that tell something about the user of the account.

Or what would some animal right protester do with the ammunition of Safari-rifle? Those things are really interesting things when people are connecting the data between social media and other sources. And those things might be very awkward for some people. That thing can destroy those persons immediately.

Public opinions might be different from real opinions

Public opinions might be different from real opinions

When people are telling their opinions publically, the real opinion of that person might be different than they think in their mind, and that will be explained that we all have will to please the bosses and great audience. That means that we sometimes are talking things, what other people want to hear. Or otherwise, because of respect, we will let people have their wrong opinions or pseudoscientific arguments because we want to please them, and that's why we let them say things, what is wrong or even dangerous.

We The problems with metering are that some people are using different kind of tools than others and in those kinds of cases, the problem is how to make people understand, that something that they cannot see might be true anyway. Many times those people have made a long career in some respected areas. And that would make a little bit difficult to say against them.

Let's take one example of the things, where many people just believe something, but the research has shown things being a little bit different than people expect. That case is bitumen, the real thing is that this material is the most stiffed liquid in the world. That thing has been proven by putting a piece of bitumen in the funnel, and during tens of years, those bites just flew down the funnel.

The thing is meanless in normal life, but cases, when somebody will repair the vacuum tanks and space stations, would that thing be in the vital role. If the place what would be used to repair the hole would be sucked to the vacuum, the results would be devastating.

Respect is bad for research. And good researcher should respect nobody.

When somebody is collecting the statistics and asks people opinion of some questions, there have ever discussed things like the majority of the population might not have opinions at all, what consists some question. But they give answers anyway. And in some cases, people don't even listen to questions what the Gallup poll maker asks.

And in some cases, they would give the name of the politician, who has become in their mind. Or what would you think about the situation, that some bodybuilder with the political police branch will come to ask the opinion about the state leader's policy? In this case, the wise man will say "yes", because in that case, the wrong answer will cause a bad result.

And there are always people who, have 20 years of experience of something, but their roll meter would not meter something, and that makes things wrong. In the science metering, something would be happening by using special equipment, and those lasers and other things will give results, what are the size of a micrometer. In that case, respect would sometimes cause that nobody fixes the answer.

The dirty trick in the military is, how to control those people?

The dirty trick in the military is, how to control those people?

If you have read my texts before, you might read one of the texts, what probably look like this, but don't worry, these texts are meant for the reading. When people are creating new things, they should also see those things with critics, and tell people, how it can be used for wrong purposes. The things like tractors have transformed to combat vehicles, and the history is full of those cases, where the thing, what is made for good, has turned to the ultimate weapon. And do you know why military forces turn to use petroleum and oil in the vehicles?

The reason was easy, it made easier to control the most lethal force of the state. The warship couldn't take fuel from everywhere, they must take their oil from exactly the right harbor. And the oil was more effective fuel that some wood or coal. But when we are thinking the tanks and other vehicles the mechanized warfare was more effective than use horses, and the gasoline was an easy way to deny the rebellions.

The reason why military forces took aircraft in the use was simple. The pilot didn't need ground combat training at all, and the vehicle was a very effective, and cheap way to make an impression for generals, who wanted results. And that's why fighters became popular weapons. The reason why those persons would not be unpopular was that they were all officers. and that showed the men, that also officers took part in the war b giving personal investment in the action.

And the aircraft became more and more powerful. When we are thinking about the advantage of the military devices, the missiles were the next step. They could be sent to the target, and then the crew was free to fight like the regular soldiers. There was no defense against ballistic missiles until the first anti-ballistic missiles were created. And those systems based the nuclear warhead, what could damage the own electronics as well as destroy enemy missiles.

Robots are the most dangerous tools, what mankind has ever created. If they are used for bad purposes, they would not excuse the orders. So if the operator will order them to torture, they would not say a thing against that order. 

Modern versions are basing the combination of microwave and kinetic energy and they should destroy the incoming warheads. Also, the target can be covered by using plasma-layer, which should deny the radar-echoes from the area, or the systems, what are making the more powerful echoes, and the idea is to make the warheads to detonate too early, or jam the detonation system by using the EMP-pulse.

The advantage of military systems is causing the thing, where drones and killer robots are coming to the battlefield. Those systems are facing the resistance, but same way nuclear weapons and bombers, as well chemical weapons have faced resistance when they were taken in use.

The drones are remote-controlled systems, and the operators would not need military training at all, and the military police can take the operator in the custody if something bad is happening. If the operator would start to make things, what that person should not do, the commander can just remove that operator from the command console.

This is why the superpowers are creating more and more effective robots, and another argument is that the commander of the robot army doesn't need to care losses. But the things against those systems is that they could be the ultimate tool in the hands of dictators. The robot doesn't ever excuse its orders, and this is the danger of those systems.

I always have said that robots don't torture, but if the commander orders them to do those things, they don't excuse. And robots are allowing to go to war, what nobody even knows. They can make even mass murders, and then they can be destroyed. That makes those devices the most dangerous thing, what mankind has ever created.