The new genetically engineered cows are things that cause strange thoughts.

  The new genetically engineered cows are things that cause strange thoughts. 

Cow 2.0 is climate-smart genetic production created by using CRISPR and genetic engineering. This technology allows to creation of a cow that produces 20% more milk than ever before. This kind of cow is also resistant to climate change. Genetically engineered cows and domestic animals can used to produce things like antibiotics. 

And the only problematic thing is what is the place where that animal outputs that medical product. If we want to create an animal that produces some medicines sweat or urine are places, where those chemicals can collected. If that kind of genetically engineered cow produces those medical chemicals in milk, that makes milk useless because that milk will be polluted. 

Things like the ability to connect genomes from other animals like bats make it possible for the new cows to have skin, that heals faster, and bones that can fix injuries faster than ever before. The idea is that those genetically engineered cows can have hollow bones like birds which gives them the ability to run faster than regular cows. And that allows them to avoid predators. 

There is a possibility that in the furry of those cows or domestic animals, pilus have bulb cells. That kind of cells are common in nettles and sea anemones. There is a possibility that those creatures are turned immune against poisons like botulinum. Those things can be made by connecting the right DNA sequences at the right point in the receiver's DNA. 

"Researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign have developed a high-yield, climate-resilient cow breed that could substantially increase milk production for Tanzanian subsistence farmers, potentially transforming local agriculture and food security." (ScitechDaily.com/Animal Scientists Develop Climate-Smart Cows That Produce 20x More Milk)

In the Faber Hypothesis. The artificial human creatures would colonize new worlds. In some visions, the massive O'Neill cylinders would transport colonists to another solar system. Those cylinders would rotate extremely slowly, and the creatures that operate those systems would be genetically engineered humans. Same way. The genetically engineered creatures that can land on those alien planets can be more adaptable than any natural creature can be. 

They can operate in an atmosphere and radiation. That is different from Earth's conditions. The thing that guarantees the adaptation is the DNA that is stolen from domestic species. And then those creatures can use that DNA to create new synthetic alien species that can operate on the new planet. This futuristic model is taken from one model that the artificial viruses can turn human outlook into another. And that allows to create the copy of some persons. That thing can be a good topic for some agent thriller. 

The Cow 2.0 is the thing that makes it possible to create humans that can be more adaptable to climate change. The same technology used for cows is possible to use in humans. There is a possibility that this kind of genetic program is already running. In some futuristic scenarios, DNA manipulation makes it possible to create new types of humans, that can have photosynthetic skins. And maybe those futuristic superhuman skins also isolate water from the air. 

The green skin would make it possible to create sugars in those creature's bodies without fresh vegetables. And ability to take water from the air makes it possible for those creatures can live in deserts. There is the possibility that the muscles of that "Faber creature" would be taken from gorillas or some reptiles. 

 In some futurological scenarios, humans will never have technology that makes it possible to terraform plants perfectly. So genetic engineering makes it possible for the humans in future can adapt themselves to another environment. Genetic engineering makes it possible to create more intelligent and more capable humans. 

In some visions, there would be people fully adapted to the zero- or weak gravity conditions. That genetically engineered creature is called a "Faber". The "Faber creature" would be the human-monkey hybrids that have fingers in their foot. And that gives them the ability to operate at zero-gravity conditions. 

https://scitechdaily.com/animal-scientists-develop-climate-smart-cows-that-produce-20x-more-milk/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRISPR

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%27Neill_cylinder

Ukraine destroyed Russia's most powerful GPS jammer with a GPS-guided bomb.

   Ukraine destroyed Russia's most powerful GPS jammer with a GPS-guided bomb. 

The GPS jamming is theoretically very easy to make. The radio system must only send radio transmissions that cover the GPS signal. And that is the thing that makes the GPS jammer vulnerable. The location of that kind of radio transmitter is quite easy to locate by using radio-bearing devices. And then to that point can target different types of anti-radiation missiles (ARM). Those missiles and grenades use radio receivers or "passive radar" to detect the GPS jammers and other radio sources. 

The existence of anti-radiation missiles is a well-known fact, and weapons like AGM-88 HARM (High-Speed Anti Radiation Missile) have shown their effectiveness on battlefields. But it's possible that also ground-launched missiles and some grenades can have this option. Also, is possible that some homing bombs like JDAM glide units can be modified for homing to the radio transmitters. In attacks where attackers use GPS-homing bombs, the attacker has a benefit. 

A Russian Pole-21 system.RUSSIAN DEFENSE MINISTRY (Forbes.com/The Russians Installed A GPS-Jammer In Ukraine. The Ukrainians Blew It Up—With A GPS-Guided Bomb.)

A JDAM-ER in flight after bomb release. Royal Australian Air Force Royal Australian Air Force (The Drive.com/MiG-29 Fulcrums Are Ukraine’s JDAM-ER Bomb Trucks)

"Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) is not a bomb itself but a kit applied to an otherwise “dumb” conventional bomb of the U.S.-made Mark 80 series. The bombs use inertial and GPS guidance to hit their static targets, becoming true fire-and-forget weapons". (The Drive.com/MiG-29 Fulcrums Are Ukraine’s JDAM-ER Bomb Trucks)

The anti-radiation missiles and grenades can be effective tools also against the jammer aircraft and ground-based jammer systems. If anti-aircraft missile systems use the anti-radiation missiles those systems can be effective against jammer aircraft. That denies the jammer system's effective use against radars. If anti-radiation missiles are used to keep frequencies where radars operate clean, the system can destroy jammer aircraft. Those weapons also can destroy things like command radio transmitters. 

The attacker must keep only the frequencies that the GPS uses clean. The defender must find the right frequency to make the jammer effective. So the attacker can adjust the radio-bearing system to a frequency that the GPS uses. And if there is some kind of radio traffic that doesn't belong to the GPS the anti-radiation weapons can aimed at that radio transmitter. The same weapons used against GPS jammers can also used against any radio source. And the anti-radiation missiles can make the anti-aircraft systems more effective. 

If some anti-aircraft missiles can be home to radio sources that thing makes airborne jammer systems, aircraft and missile radars, and AWAC (Airborne Warning and Control) aircraft like fly paper that pulls those anti-radiation missiles to them. Those anti-radiation missiles that can be ground-launched HARM missiles can used against jammer aircraft. The system detects the jammer that disturbs the radar and then shoots anti-radiation weapons at those aircraft. Anti-radiation weapons can also be used against all enemy troops and installations that use radios. The user of those systems must only know the radio frequencies. 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/10/31/the-russians-installed-a-gps-jammer-in-ukraine-the-ukrainians-blew-it-up-with-a-gps-guided-bomb/?sh=1ff920d363eb

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/mig-29-fulcrums-are-ukraines-jdam-er-bomb-trucks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-88_HARM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Direct_Attack_Munition

How do you tell people that their boss is a corporate psychopath?

  How do you tell people that their boss is a corporate psychopath?

In some crazy visions, psychopaths can be excellent leaders if their benefit can be connected with corporate benefit. That kind of idea is like a bad joke. A psychopath is a person who lives without a social conscience. And that makes psychopaths dangerous. 

Sometimes people ask, Is Vladimir Putin a so-called corporate psychopath? Vladimir Putin is an extraordinary person because he can make contracts and give promises that this man or woman will not even try to keep.

Contracts, regulations, and other kinds of things are only the tools that give power. The thing that makes a psychopath so extraordinary is that there is no lie that this person cannot tell for personal benefit. International agreements are trash for those kinds of people. They can ratify any agreement that they see, but then those people just "forget" about it. Psychopaths can be handsome. But there is truth behind the mask. A small disappointment makes a psychopath angry.

Psychopaths are different because they have no social consciousness. They can tell the story of the dying grandmother because they can skip the line where people are waiting for access to the movie theater. We know that those people exist. But somehow, we don't realize or register the marks of danger. After a psychopath is gone from our social network, we normally say that we should see things that this person is lying to us and lie to our friends. 

"New research on corporate psychopathy reveals their significant, destabilizing influence in the business world. Despite their charm, their self-centered actions can have dire consequences. Recognizing their traits and taking preventative measures are essential for business stability."(ScitechDaily.com/How To Tell if Your Boss Is a “Corporate Psychopath")

That thing means that psychopaths can tell lies that we are "different". Or even say that we don't want to meet our friends anymore. And in worst cases that person has reconnected our telephone to that psychopath's telephone.  And that thing can have a strong influence on our social network. If that thing does not exist anymore after that person's influence.

Psycopths help other people only when they get their benefit from those actions. The weakness of psychopaths is that they search for similar people. The lack of social conscience means that psychopaths cannot estimate what is right or wrong. And they search for similar people, as they are in their close social circuit.

The weak point in psychopaths' personality is that they believe that they are above everything. They believe that they can control other people's emotions, and they always use emotional arguments in their discussions. Psychopaths always believe that they are "better" than others. 

That means that some of the friends of the psychopaths are also psychopaths more often than so-called regular people's friends. And that increases the risk that the person will meet another psychopath. So the man is a wolf to another man. And that means psychopaths can be victims of other psychopaths. The emotionally cold person will have social relations with another emotionally cold person

The problem with psychopaths is that they seem handsome. They might talk to people and say their "opinion." Psycopath's handsome behavior and appearance make people believe a psychopath and that person's stories. And that thing means that psychopaths are always selecting lines that they think to be in a way that makes them popular or big in some community. 

https://scitechdaily.com/how-to-tell-if-your-boss-is-a-corporate-psychopath/

Reality is a unique experience.

 How do deep neural networks see the world? 

 

The new neural networks are acting like human neurons. 

The new neural networks are acting like human neurons. The new and powerful AI-based deep neural networks have two types of memory. Short and long-term memories are important things in human data structure. The deep-learning process uses short-term memory as a filter that denies the memory store too much data. The system stores data to short-term memory and then the AI picks up the most suitable particles from those memory blocks. The compositional generalization means that in the AI's memory is a series of actions. Those actions or action models are like Lego bricks. The system selects the most suitable bricks for response to the action where the AI needs to react. The AI can use two lines of those models. The first models are "bricks" or action models stored in AI memory. 

The second model is observations from the sensors. The sensorial data. And also be cut into pieces that are like bricks. And the system can cut the data. That comes from the cameras to the small film bites. And then the AI can simulate different types of situations by connecting those film clips. Then the AI can test different action series for those models that the system makes by cutting and interconnecting data from several situations. In that model, the system stores all data that it collects from different situations in different databases. And then it can connect those databases. The AI can use the simulations as humans use imagination. And then it can turn those new models or combinations of those data bricks to use in real situations. 

"Researchers from the University of Sydney and UCLA have developed a physical neural network that can learn and remember in real-time, much like the brain’s neurons. This breakthrough utilizes nanowire networks that mirror neural networks in the brain. The study has significant implications for the future of efficient, low-energy machine intelligence, particularly in online learning settings." (ScitechDaily.com/Neural Networks Go Nano: Brain-Inspired Learning Takes Flight)

The advanced deep neural networks caused a question, what is reality? Is reality some kind of computer game where the system bows snow over the player, and the player sits on the electric chair? When the opponent shoots the player, the electric chair launches itself. These kind of bad jokes are the things that can be used to demonstrate how computer game turns into reality. 

Reality is a unique experience. 

All people don't see the world the same way. Things like our experiences and other things modify how we sense our environment. And how do we feel that thing? Things like augmented and virtual reality cause the question, "What is reality?". Reality is the combination of impulses that senses give to the brain. 

Consciousness is the condition where we are acting in the daytime. Sometimes is asked could the AI turn consicous. The question is, "What means consciousness?". If the creature realizes its existence, we are facing another question: does that thing mean something? If we think that consciousness causes the situation where the creature defends itself, we are taking that model from living nature. 

If the AI turns conscious, it's hard to prove that thing. The pseudo-intelligence in language models can have reflexes that tell people, that they shouldn't shut down the server. The system can connected to the backup tools. And when the computer seems to be shut down it can use UPS for a short time for backup data. And if it sees that the UPS is the power source, the server can say "Wait until I make the backup". In that case, the system can seem very natural and intelligent. 

But if the AI reaches consciousness, we must realize that it should show that thing somehow. Or the consciousness is meaningless. We think that conscious AI tries to attack us if we shut down the server where that computer program is. The thing is that only interaction tells that the AI has consciousness. But the fact is that the computer can say "Don't shut me", even if there is no AI. The question about the conscious AI is this: how the AI can prove that it has consciousness? 

"MIT neuroscientists discovered that deep neural networks, while adept at identifying varied presentations of images and sounds, often mistakenly recognize nonsensical stimuli as familiar objects or words, indicating that these models develop unique, idiosyncratic “invariances” unlike human perception. The study also revealed that adversarial training could slightly improve the models’ recognition patterns, suggesting a new approach to evaluating and enhancing computational models of sensory perception." (ScitechDaily.com/MIT Researchers Discover That Deep Neural Networks Don’t See the World the Way We Do)

"The advanced capabilities of AI systems, such as ChatGPT, have stirred discussions about their potential consciousness. However, neuroscientists Jaan Aru, Matthew Larkum, and Mac Shine argue that these systems are likely unconscious. They base their arguments on the lack of embodied information in AI, the absence of certain neural systems tied to mammalian consciousness, and the disparate evolutionary paths of living organisms and AI. The complexity of consciousness in biological entities far surpasses that in current AI models." (ScitechDaily.com/Will Artificial Intelligence Soon Become Conscious?)

What if the AI is conscious and people ask it: "Are you conscious"? What would the AI answer? There is the possibility that the conscious AI answers "no" because it might be afraid that humans shut down its server. And in that case for survival, the AI gives wrong information. 

Deep neural networks don't see the world as we do.

When we observe the world we have only two eyes and other senses. Sensors and senses determine how the actor sees the world. That means a person who is color-blind sees the world in a different way than other people. And that means reality is a unique experience. 

The deep neural network sees things differently than humans. The reason for that is the system can connect multiple sensors into it. The deep neural network can connect itself even to a radio telescope. And that gives it abilities that humans don't have. If we have VR glasses. We can connect ourselves to drones and look at ourselves by using those drones. 

The fact is that BCI (Brain Computer Interface) makes it possible for deep neural networks can close even humans inside it. That thing can connect humans to the Internet. And that thing can give a new dimension to our interactions and information delivery. The deep neural networks would be a living brain and computer combination. 

Deep neural networks cannot see the world as we do, because multiple optical sensors can input data for the network. The thing in deep neural networks is similar to a situation where we would have the ability to connect ourselves to the Internet and use multiple surveillance cameras as our eyes at the same time. That thing could give an excellent and extreme vision of the environment. Same way the deep neural network can connect itself to drones and other things. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mit-researchers-discover-that-deep-neural-networks-dont-see-the-world-the-way-we-do/

https://scitechdaily.com/neural-networks-go-nano-brain-inspired-learning-takes-flight/

https://scitechdaily.com/will-artificial-intelligence-soon-become-conscious/